Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Effect of trenbolone acetate, melengestrol acetate, and ractopamine hydrochloride on growth performance of growing beef cattle
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Effect of trenbolone acetate, melengestrol acetate, and ractopamine hydrochloride on growth performance of growing beef cattle
Do you wish to request the book?
Effect of trenbolone acetate, melengestrol acetate, and ractopamine hydrochloride on growth performance of growing beef cattle
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Effect of trenbolone acetate, melengestrol acetate, and ractopamine hydrochloride on growth performance of growing beef cattle
2020
Overview
This study evaluated the effect of trenbolone acetate + estradiol implants (TBA), melengestrol acetate (MGA), and ractopamine hydrochloride (RAC) on the performance of beef cattle fed barley grain/corn silage diets. Beef cattle (279 ± 10.1 kg) were used in a complete randomized 4-yr study (yr 1, 2, n = 120 heifers and 80 steers; yr 3, 4, n = 120 heifers and 120 steers). Cattle were blocked by weight and randomly assigned to 4 pens/treatment/yr. Treatments were 1) control heifers [no growth promoters (GP)], 2) TBA implanted heifers, 3) MGA heifers, 4) control steers (no GP), and 5) TBA implanted steers (yrs 1 to 4), and included a sixth treatment 6) TBA implanted + RAC steers for yrs 3 and 4. Cattle were fed for a similar duration (262 d ± 8) in all treatments. TBA increased the DMI of steers and heifers (P < 0.001) compared to controls (9.52 vs. 8.73 kg DM/d). MGA did not affect DMI (P = 0.41); however, TBA+RAC steers had grater DMI (P = 0.02; 9.91 vs. 9.58 kg DM/d) compared to TBA steers. Compared to controls, TBA heifers had greater ADG (P < 0.001; 1.45 vs. 1.29 kg), G:F (P < 0.001; 0.157 vs. 0.149), and carcass weight (P < 0.001; 390 vs. 360 kg). TBA also increased steers ADG (P < 0.001; 1.70 vs. 1.41 kg), G:F (P < 0.001; 0.174 vs. 0.161), and carcass weight (P < 0.001; 425 vs. 389 kg). Compared to control heifers, MGA increased (P < 0.01) ADG, G:F, and carcass weight by 8.1%, 7.0%, and 4.7%, respectively. The ADG and carcass weight of TBA+RAC steers increased (P < 0.01) by 5.6% and 3.2%, respectively with no effect (P = 0.87) on G:F compared to TBA steers. This 4-yr study demonstrates the consistent positive impact of conventional growth-enhancing technologies.
