Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Reforming the United Nations Security Council: Feasibility or Utopia?
by
Schaefer, Kai
in
Decision making
/ International Relations
/ Legitimacy
/ Political science
2016
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Reforming the United Nations Security Council: Feasibility or Utopia?
by
Schaefer, Kai
in
Decision making
/ International Relations
/ Legitimacy
/ Political science
2016
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Reforming the United Nations Security Council: Feasibility or Utopia?
Dissertation
Reforming the United Nations Security Council: Feasibility or Utopia?
2016
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Reforming the United Nations Security Council has been on the agenda of the General Assembly for over two decades. However, structural reform of the Council remains elusive. This research paper will seek to explain why after so many years nearly all 193 states within the UN remain actively seized on the matter of reform, and ongoing commitment to Council reform can be observed. In order to properly analyze SC reform efforts and the various obstacles along the way, this paper emphasizes states’ motivations during the reform process. This thesis argues that although states work on the same objective, namely that of reforming the UNSC, they do so for varying reasons. With the help of new institutionalist theory, an argument is formed that highlights how certain states are more driven by strategic calculations and self-interest, while others are more normatively motivated, and thus are more driven by what is considered appropriate. Furthermore, this thesis highlights that despite only lukewarm support for reform from certain states, not a single state can publicly denounce Council reform, because the reform issue itself has become an ingrained norm. Emphasis will be given to structural reform, such as increasing the size of the Council, as well as improving the SC’s working methods. Despite the lack of formal reform, the SC has continually proven to be adaptive in order to remain relevant well into the 21st century.
Publisher
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
Subject
ISBN
9798597040363
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.