Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Peer review declaration
in
Criteria
2021
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Do you wish to request the book?
Peer review declaration
in
Criteria
2021
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Peer review declaration
2021
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering has been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by experts referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.: • Type of peer review: Double-blind (Conference reviewers and iThenticate system) • Conference submission management system: Conference Management Toolkit (CMT) • Number of submissions received: 12 full papers and 12 abstracts • Number of submissions sent for review: 12 full papers • Number of submissions accepted: 7 full papers • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 58% • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 • Total number of reviewers involved: 58 • Any additional info on review process: The papers were evaluated based on the technical criteria, quality criteria and presentation criteria. The referees argued detailed their reviews and provided an overall evaluation (strong accept, accept, weak accept, weak reject, reject, strong reject), specifying their confidence (expert, high, medium, low, none) regarding qualifications to review the allocated paper. • Contact person for queries: Ms. Alice Liu; alice@isaeri.org
Publisher
IOP Publishing
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.