Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Is There a Difference in Acute Performance when Testing Different Motor Imagery Protocols?
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Is There a Difference in Acute Performance when Testing Different Motor Imagery Protocols?
Do you wish to request the book?
Is There a Difference in Acute Performance when Testing Different Motor Imagery Protocols?
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Dissertation
Is There a Difference in Acute Performance when Testing Different Motor Imagery Protocols?
2022
Overview
Fifteen participants ages 18 – 40 volunteered for this study. Inclusion criteria consisted of scoring 28 or higher on the motor imagery questionnaire- revised second version. Pre and post maximal contractions were performed during each intervention, kinesthetic motor imagery, visual motor imagery, and a control. Kinesthetic motor imagery: listening to an audio of what to imagine. Visual motor imagery: watching a video of what to image and a control: resting for 5 minutes. Results of two-way (3 x 2) Repeated Measures ANOVA [condition (control, kinesthetic, visual) x time (pre x post)] showed no significant interaction between the condition and the time. These results show that mental imagery does not have an acute effect on maximal torque.
