Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
JUDGMENT OF JUSTICE OF QUOTAS IN THE UNIVERSITY AND ITS RELATION WITH THE MORAL DEVELOPMENT
by
Vieira, Kênia Eliber
, Caetano, Luciana Maria
, Betânia Alves Veiga Dell' Agli
in
Quotas
/ Students
2022
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
JUDGMENT OF JUSTICE OF QUOTAS IN THE UNIVERSITY AND ITS RELATION WITH THE MORAL DEVELOPMENT
by
Vieira, Kênia Eliber
, Caetano, Luciana Maria
, Betânia Alves Veiga Dell' Agli
in
Quotas
/ Students
2022
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
JUDGMENT OF JUSTICE OF QUOTAS IN THE UNIVERSITY AND ITS RELATION WITH THE MORAL DEVELOPMENT
Journal Article
JUDGMENT OF JUSTICE OF QUOTAS IN THE UNIVERSITY AND ITS RELATION WITH THE MORAL DEVELOPMENT
2022
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between the fairness of quota judgment and the level of moral competency of students and professors. This work was conducted with 317 college students and 15 professors from a base course for engineering at a Public University. We use a structured questionnaire to collect data, composed of a dilemma of quotas and eight arguments related to justice and eight to injustice of quotas. We still apply the Moral Competence Test (MCT_xt), which considers affective and cognitive aspects of the judgment and gives rise to score - C. The results indicated the low C index of the participants, conflict of interest in the judgment of the fairness of quota and the racial issue as the main disagreement factor. Among non-quota students, the higher the C index, the more they considered quotas like unfairness and among quota students, the lower the C score, the greater the choice for fairness. For judgments based on equity, as in the case of affirmative actions, higher levels of moral development would be necessary. Education has an essential role in developing students’ moral competence and, consequently, in promoting their participation in social, civic and professional life.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.