Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Measure for Measure
by
Meshel, Naphtali S
in
Bilingualism
/ Lexical choice
/ Narratives
/ Oral tradition
/ Text analysis
/ Torah
/ Word play
2024
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Measure for Measure
by
Meshel, Naphtali S
in
Bilingualism
/ Lexical choice
/ Narratives
/ Oral tradition
/ Text analysis
/ Torah
/ Word play
2024
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Measure for Measure
2024
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
In an article published in this journal more than thirty years ago, Raphael Jospe argued (citing an oral tradition that he traced back to Mordechai Kaplan) that the term regel in the famed talmudic narrative about a gentile who approached Shammas and Hillel desiring to be taught the entire Torah \"on one regel\" is intended as a bilingual pun. Jospe supported Kaplan's argument, demonstrating its likelihood as well as its ramifications, and added several circumstantial and contextual considerations, which need not be repeated in detail. This brief note adds two tentative pieces of evidence pertaining to wordplay in the narrative that are not found in Jospe's article--one based on a textual variant, the other on close attention to the proselyte's choice of words. The two new pieces of evidence are not dependent on Jospe's theory and are worthy of consideration in their own right even if Kaplan's insight is rejected as unlikely.
Publisher
University of Pennsylvania Press
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.