Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
CoRE: Condition-based Reasoning for Identifying Outcome Variance in Complex Events
by
Ferraro, Francis
, Vallurupalli, Sai
in
Annotations
/ Reasoning
2025
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
CoRE: Condition-based Reasoning for Identifying Outcome Variance in Complex Events
by
Ferraro, Francis
, Vallurupalli, Sai
in
Annotations
/ Reasoning
2025
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
CoRE: Condition-based Reasoning for Identifying Outcome Variance in Complex Events
Paper
CoRE: Condition-based Reasoning for Identifying Outcome Variance in Complex Events
2025
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Knowing which latent conditions lead to a particular outcome is useful for critically examining claims made about complex event outcomes. Identifying implied conditions and examining their influence on an outcome is challenging. We handle this by combining and augmenting annotations from two existing datasets consisting of goals and states, and explore the influence of conditions through our research questions and Condition-based Reasoning tasks. We examine open and closed LLMs of varying sizes and intent-alignment on our reasoning tasks and find that conditions are useful when not all context is available. Models differ widely in their ability to generate and identify outcome-variant conditions which affects their performance on outcome validation when conditions are used to replace missing context. Larger models like GPT-4o, are more cautious in such less constrained situations.
Publisher
Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.