Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Objective Metrics for Evaluating Large Language Models Using External Data Sources
by
Du, Haoze
, Li, Richard
, Gehringer, Edward
in
Large language models
/ Performance assessment
/ Performance evaluation
/ Subjective assessment
2025
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Objective Metrics for Evaluating Large Language Models Using External Data Sources
by
Du, Haoze
, Li, Richard
, Gehringer, Edward
in
Large language models
/ Performance assessment
/ Performance evaluation
/ Subjective assessment
2025
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Objective Metrics for Evaluating Large Language Models Using External Data Sources
Paper
Objective Metrics for Evaluating Large Language Models Using External Data Sources
2025
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Evaluating the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) is a critical yet challenging task, particularly when aiming to avoid subjective assessments. This paper proposes a framework for leveraging subjective metrics derived from the class textual materials across different semesters to assess LLM outputs across various tasks. By utilizing well-defined benchmarks, factual datasets, and structured evaluation pipelines, the approach ensures consistent, reproducible, and bias-minimized measurements. The framework emphasizes automation and transparency in scoring, reducing reliance on human interpretation while ensuring alignment with real-world applications. This method addresses the limitations of subjective evaluation methods, providing a scalable solution for performance assessment in educational, scientific, and other high-stakes domains.
Publisher
Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.