Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Disjoint non-forking amalgamation in stable AECs
by
Beard, Jeremy
in
Amalgamation
2026
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Do you wish to request the book?
Disjoint non-forking amalgamation in stable AECs
by
Beard, Jeremy
in
Amalgamation
2026
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Paper
Disjoint non-forking amalgamation in stable AECs
2026
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The disjoint amalgamation property (DAP), which asserts that all spans of a class of models can be amalgamated with minimal intersection, is an important property in the context of abstract elementary classes, with connections to both Grossberg's question and Shelah's categoricity conjecture. We prove that, in a nice AEC \\(K\\) stable in \\( LS(K)\\) with a strong enough independence relation, all high cofinality \\(\\)-limit models are disjoint (non-forking) amalgamation bases. \\(Theorem.\\) Let \\(K\\) be an AEC stable in \\(\\), where \\(K_\\) has AP, JEP, and NMM, and let \\(K'\\) be some AC where \\(K_( ) K' K_\\). Suppose there is an independence relation on \\(K'\\) satisfying uniqueness, existence, non-forking amalgamation, \\(K_( )\\)-universal continuity* in \\(K_\\), and \\(( )\\)-local character. Assume \\(M_0, M_1, M_2 ın K_( )\\), and that \\(M_0 _K M_l\\) and \\(a_l ın M_l\\) for \\(l = 1, 2\\). Then there exist \\(N ın K_( )\\) and \\(f_l : M_l N\\) fixing \\(M_0\\) for \\(l = 1, 2\\) such that \\(gtp(f_l(a_l)/f_3-l[M_3-l], N)\\) does not fork over \\(M_0\\) and \\(f_1[M_1] f_2[M_2] = M_0\\). That is, our independence relation has disjoint non-forking amalgamation in \\(K_( )\\). In particular, every \\(M_0 ın K_( )\\) is a disjoint amalgamation base in \\(K_\\). The hypotheses on the independence relation can be weakened (closer to \\(\\)-non-splitting in \\(\\)-stable AECs) if we are willing to give up the `non-forking' conditions of the amalgamation.
Publisher
Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
Subject
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.