Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Is it bad to have secrets? Cognitive preoccupation as a toxic element of secrecy1
by
Wismeijer, Andreas A J
, Van Assen, Marcel A L M
, Aquarius, Annelies E A M
, Maas, Joyce
in
Behavior
/ Clinical medicine
/ HIV
/ Human immunodeficiency virus
/ Studies
2012
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Is it bad to have secrets? Cognitive preoccupation as a toxic element of secrecy1
by
Wismeijer, Andreas A J
, Van Assen, Marcel A L M
, Aquarius, Annelies E A M
, Maas, Joyce
in
Behavior
/ Clinical medicine
/ HIV
/ Human immunodeficiency virus
/ Studies
2012
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Is it bad to have secrets? Cognitive preoccupation as a toxic element of secrecy1
Journal Article
Is it bad to have secrets? Cognitive preoccupation as a toxic element of secrecy1
2012
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
This ex post facto study examined the effect of secrecy on well-being in a sample of 287 HIV-positive individuals, using both self-report data and objective immune parameters. The effects on well-being of three components of secrecy were studied; self-concealment, possession of a secret, and cognitive preoccupation. Confirming our hypotheses, we found a positive effect of possession of a secret on quality of life, depression and anxiety, but only after controlling for both self-concealment and cognitive preoccupation. The effects of self-concealment and cognitive preoccupation on wellbeing were negative. Since cognitive preoccupation partly mediated the effect of selfconcealment on well-being, we concluded that cognitive preoccupation is a toxic element of secrecy. Our results imply that HIV-positive individuals that keep their serostatus secret are not per se at risk to directly experience negative effects of concealing their serostatus, as long as they do not have a disposition to conceal personal information and do not ruminate about their secret(s). [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Publisher
Elsevier Limited
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.