Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Maximal lactate steady state: A new proposal to estimates through of an incremental test in cyclergometer
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Maximal lactate steady state: A new proposal to estimates through of an incremental test in cyclergometer
Do you wish to request the book?
Maximal lactate steady state: A new proposal to estimates through of an incremental test in cyclergometer
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Maximal lactate steady state: A new proposal to estimates through of an incremental test in cyclergometer
2012
Overview
The aim of this study was to investigate the possibility of estimating the maximal lactate steady state (MLSS) on a cycle ergometer using the blood lactate concentrations [La super( -)] of 4 mM (OBLA) and 5 mM (LA-5mM). Thirty-five volunteers (23.9 plus or minus 2.4 years, 75.9 plus or minus 7.3 kg and 47.8 plus or minus 4.9 mL*kg super( -1)*min super( -1)) performed an incremental test and 3 to 5 constant intensity exercises for the determination of MLSS. There was no difference between the MLSS intensity (177.9 plus or minus 36.8 W) and the LA-5mM (183.9 plus or minus 42.4 W). However, OBLA (168.3 plus or minus 42.8 W) underestimated the MLSS (p < .05). Heart rate (HR) in the MLSS (162.3 plus or minus 10.8 bpm) was similar to the HR in the LA-5mM (160.4 plus or minus 11.4 bpm), but was higher (p < .05) than HR in OBLA (151.6 plus or minus 12.4 bpm). There was no significant difference between the rate of perceived exertion in the MLSS (16 plus or minus 2), LA-5mM (17 plus or minus 1) and OBLA (16 plus or minus 2). Our results suggest that LA-5mM was more efficient to estimate the MLSS in cycle ergometer.
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.