MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
PS-155Comparison Of Clinical And Electrophysiological Signs Of Encephalopathy In Neonates With Perinatal Asphyxia Qualifying For Hypothermia
PS-155Comparison Of Clinical And Electrophysiological Signs Of Encephalopathy In Neonates With Perinatal Asphyxia Qualifying For Hypothermia
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
PS-155Comparison Of Clinical And Electrophysiological Signs Of Encephalopathy In Neonates With Perinatal Asphyxia Qualifying For Hypothermia
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
PS-155Comparison Of Clinical And Electrophysiological Signs Of Encephalopathy In Neonates With Perinatal Asphyxia Qualifying For Hypothermia
PS-155Comparison Of Clinical And Electrophysiological Signs Of Encephalopathy In Neonates With Perinatal Asphyxia Qualifying For Hypothermia

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
PS-155Comparison Of Clinical And Electrophysiological Signs Of Encephalopathy In Neonates With Perinatal Asphyxia Qualifying For Hypothermia
PS-155Comparison Of Clinical And Electrophysiological Signs Of Encephalopathy In Neonates With Perinatal Asphyxia Qualifying For Hypothermia
Journal Article

PS-155Comparison Of Clinical And Electrophysiological Signs Of Encephalopathy In Neonates With Perinatal Asphyxia Qualifying For Hypothermia

2014
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background and aimsEarly prediction of neurodevelopmental outcome following hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy remains a challenge. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the aEEG background patterns and Thompson score on admission in asphyxiated neonates receiving hypothermia regarding outcome and neonatal variables.MethodsAfter excluding congenital malformations and muscle paralysis, 89 neonates (January 2008 to June 2012) were included (GA: 39.7 plus or minus 1.8 wks; BW: 3504 plus or minus 640 g). On admission the Thompson score and aEEG were recorded. aEEG was scored as Continuous Normal Voltage (CNV), Discontinuous Normal Voltage (DNV), Burst-Suppression (BS), Continuous Low Voltage (CLV) or Flat Trace (FT). The combination of one or more of the following event (s): death, cerebral palsy, and Griffiths DQ less than 85 at 18 months were considered an adverse outcome. ANOVA, correlation, and binary logistic regression analyses were performed.ResultsThompson scores (in mean plus or minus sd) were associated with aEEG pattern (CNV: 8.3 plus or minus 1.7; DNV: 8.9 plus or minus 1.9; BS: 11.6 plus or minus 3.6; CLV: 12.0 plus or minus 2.1; FT: 13.1 plus or minus 3.2; p < 0.001). Also, both aEEG and Thompson score were statistically correlated with Apgar 1 and 5 min scores (p < 0.05). Using a logistic regression model, both Thompson score (OR = 1.43; 95% CI = [1.15; 1.77]) and aEEG pattern (BS: OR = 4.06; 95% CI = [0.74; 22.16]; CLV: OR = 11.10; 95% CI = [1.38; 89.66]; FT: OR = 13.35; 95% CI = [1.87; 95.31]; reference group: CNV+DNV) were significant predictors of an adverse outcome.ConclusionsBoth Thompson scores and aEEG are associated with outcome in neonates receiving hypothermia for perinatal asphyxia and with 1 min Apgar scores. Further studies are needed to identify which method is preferable for selection of neonates for hypothermia.

MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks