Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
State of independence: explaining and maintaining the distinctive competence of the
by
Nagel, Jack H
in
British Journal of Political Science
/ Independence
/ Organizational goals
/ Periodicals
/ Political science
/ Technological change
2010
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
State of independence: explaining and maintaining the distinctive competence of the
by
Nagel, Jack H
in
British Journal of Political Science
/ Independence
/ Organizational goals
/ Periodicals
/ Political science
/ Technological change
2010
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
State of independence: explaining and maintaining the distinctive competence of the
Journal Article
State of independence: explaining and maintaining the distinctive competence of the
2010
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Uniquely among leading generalist journals in political science, the BJPolS is independent of any professional association. Although organizational sponsorship confers great advantages, the BJPolS has thrived during its first forty years because able editors exploited their independence to adopt policies that were less feasible for official journals subject to membership pressures a distinctive focus on contemporary theory, receptivity to overseas contributors, flexibility about longer articles and dual submissions, and active editorial discretion. These practices should continue to serve the journal well despite challenges posed by technological change. In responding to specialized competitors, the BJPolS should maintain its aspiration to publish papers that address 'problems of general significance to students of politics' by connecting analytical models to empirical evidence and enduring normative goals. Adapted from the source document. Reprinted by permission of Cambridge University Press. An electronic version of this article can be accessed via the internet at http://journals.cambridge.org
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.