Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The Metaphorical-Literary Dichotomy: Rethinking the Question of Primacy
by
Zir, Alessandro
in
Meaning
/ Metaphors
/ Philosophy of Language
2003
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
The Metaphorical-Literary Dichotomy: Rethinking the Question of Primacy
by
Zir, Alessandro
in
Meaning
/ Metaphors
/ Philosophy of Language
2003
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
The Metaphorical-Literary Dichotomy: Rethinking the Question of Primacy
Journal Article
The Metaphorical-Literary Dichotomy: Rethinking the Question of Primacy
2003
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
A survey of some of the most representative language philosophies in the Western tradition leads to the conclusion that the perennial issue of whether linguistic meanings are literal or metaphorical may never be decided unequivocally. Plato's, Giambattista Vico's (1725), Friedrich Nietzsche's (1873), Anthony Richard's (1936), & Jacques Derrida's (1989) views are considered, concluding that the problems of circularity, self-reference, & regression ad infinitum are formidable obstacles to resolving the question of the first, original, & fundamental, meaning of linguistic signs. 11 References. Adapted from the source document
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.