Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
No win loses law firm pounds 1.5m fee
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
No win loses law firm pounds 1.5m fee
Do you wish to request the book?
No win loses law firm pounds 1.5m fee
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Newspaper Article
No win loses law firm pounds 1.5m fee
2004
Overview
If Det Insp Oliver had won [Peter Carter-Ruck] would have had a fee likely to have amounted to more than the damages he would have received. Barton Taylor, the Carter-Ruck partner who represented Det Insp Oliver, said that conditional fee arrangements (CFA) - the formal name for no win, no fee - were \"essential to the interests of justice\". Det Insp Oliver became concerned that colleagues might have been conspiring to strengthen improperly the evidence against a Newcastle nurse who had been charged with attempted murder.
Publisher
Guardian News & Media Limited
Subject
