Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Phony global warming 'certainty'
in
Revkin, Andrew
2009
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Do you wish to request the book?
Phony global warming 'certainty'
in
Revkin, Andrew
2009
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Newspaper Article
Phony global warming 'certainty'
2009
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Concerning those predictions, The New York Times was -- as it is today in a contrary crusade -- a megaphone for the alarmed, as when (May 21, 1975) it reported that \"a major cooling of the climate\" was \"widely considered inevitable\" because it was \"well established\" that the Northern Hemisphere's climate \"has been getting cooler since about 1950.\" Now the Times, a trumpet that never sounds retreat in today's war against warming, has afforded this column an opportunity to revisit another facet of this subject -- meretricious journalism in the service of dubious certitudes. Which returns us to [Andrew Revkin]. In a story ostensibly about journalism, he simply asserts -- how does he know this? -- that the last decade, which passed without warming, was just \"a pause in warming.\" His attempt to contact this writer was an e-mail sent at 5:47 p.m., a few hours before the Times began printing his story, which was not so time-sensitive -- it concerned controversies already many days running -- that it had to appear the next day. But Revkin reported that \"experts said\" this columnist's intervention in the climate debate was \"riddled with\" inaccuracies. Revkin's supposed experts might exist and might have expertise, but they do not have names that Revkin wished to divulge.
Publisher
Chattanooga Times Free Press
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.