Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Adequate facilities proposals rejected ; Harford amendments targeted school crowding
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Adequate facilities proposals rejected ; Harford amendments targeted school crowding
Do you wish to request the book?
Adequate facilities proposals rejected ; Harford amendments targeted school crowding
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Newspaper Article
Adequate facilities proposals rejected ; Harford amendments targeted school crowding
2003
Overview
The council rejected all four of the task force's proposed amendments, which were introduced by [Dion F. Guthrie]. They included: A proposal from the Harford County Council of PTAs that preliminary approval for new housing construction be withheld by the county in any school district in which a school exceeds 110 percent of its designed capacity or is projected to reach 110 percent in four years. Guthrie first proposed changes in the APF laws, as they are commonly called, in March when he sought to correct situations that has some schools operating at 20 percent and 29 percent above their student capacity.
Publisher
Tribune Publishing Company, LLC
Subject
