Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
SYMPOSIUM: A WORLD WITHOUT NUCLEAR ARMS?; Demystifying The Bomb
by
Freeman J. Dyson, a professor of physics at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J., is the author of ''Coming To Life,'' to be published next
, year., Freeman J. Dyson
in
ARMS CONTROL AND LIMITATION AND DISARMAMENT
/ ATOMIC WEAPONS
/ DYSON, FREEMAN J (PROF)
/ HITLER, ADOLF (1889-1945)
/ WORLD WAR II (1939-45)
1987
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
SYMPOSIUM: A WORLD WITHOUT NUCLEAR ARMS?; Demystifying The Bomb
by
Freeman J. Dyson, a professor of physics at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J., is the author of ''Coming To Life,'' to be published next
, year., Freeman J. Dyson
in
ARMS CONTROL AND LIMITATION AND DISARMAMENT
/ ATOMIC WEAPONS
/ DYSON, FREEMAN J (PROF)
/ HITLER, ADOLF (1889-1945)
/ WORLD WAR II (1939-45)
1987
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
SYMPOSIUM: A WORLD WITHOUT NUCLEAR ARMS?; Demystifying The Bomb
by
Freeman J. Dyson, a professor of physics at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J., is the author of ''Coming To Life,'' to be published next
, year., Freeman J. Dyson
in
ARMS CONTROL AND LIMITATION AND DISARMAMENT
/ ATOMIC WEAPONS
/ DYSON, FREEMAN J (PROF)
/ HITLER, ADOLF (1889-1945)
/ WORLD WAR II (1939-45)
1987
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
SYMPOSIUM: A WORLD WITHOUT NUCLEAR ARMS?; Demystifying The Bomb
Newspaper Article
SYMPOSIUM: A WORLD WITHOUT NUCLEAR ARMS?; Demystifying The Bomb
1987
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
All American thinking about nuclear weapons is strongly influenced by two popular myths surrounding their origin. One myth says that nuclear weapons were decisive in winning World War II. The second myth says that if Hitler had acquired nuclear weapons first, he could have used them to conquer the world. Both myths were believed by the scientists and statesmen who built the first nuclear weapons. They are still believed by most Americans today. These myths have created the unexamined background for later American doctrine concerning nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons are seen as militarily decisive (because we won) and historically justified (because Hitler might have conquered the world). If a political arrangement is to be durable, it must pay attention both to technical facts and to ethical principles. Technology without morality is barbarous; morality without technology is impotent. But in the public discussion of nuclear policies in the United States, technology has usually been overemphasized and morality, neglected. It is time for us now to redress the balance, to think more about moral principles and less about technical details. The roots of our nuclear madness lie in moral failures rather than in technical mistakes. Our thinking is permeated by our historical myths. We tend to accept without serious question the idea that nuclear weapons are militarily decisive. We usually equate military effectiveness with destructive power. We rarely examine critically the military purpose of nuclear weapons or the possible missions for which they might be used. The case for the feasibility of abolishing nuclear weapons would be stronger if we treated them with less respect. The hope of successful abolition becomes more realistic if it is understood that nuclear weapons are absurd rather than omnipotent.
Publisher
New York Times Company
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.