MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
DEFENSE FOR PRINCIPAL ALLEGES JUROR MISCONDUCT
DEFENSE FOR PRINCIPAL ALLEGES JUROR MISCONDUCT
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
DEFENSE FOR PRINCIPAL ALLEGES JUROR MISCONDUCT
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
DEFENSE FOR PRINCIPAL ALLEGES JUROR MISCONDUCT
DEFENSE FOR PRINCIPAL ALLEGES JUROR MISCONDUCT

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
DEFENSE FOR PRINCIPAL ALLEGES JUROR MISCONDUCT
DEFENSE FOR PRINCIPAL ALLEGES JUROR MISCONDUCT
Newspaper Article

DEFENSE FOR PRINCIPAL ALLEGES JUROR MISCONDUCT

2012
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Jurors heard trial testimony about a July 2009 meeting between [Thomas Correa] and a witness that was filmed without Correa's knowledge. Correa's defense lawyer, Dave Bogenschutz, wrote that if jurors saw the full DVD, it may have affected their verdict because the defense had no opportunity to question witnesses or challenge what appeared on the video. The alternate juror claimed that \"several of the jurors had been speaking and talking about the case before she was released and before deliberations\" began. If true, that would have violated the judge's daily orders to jurors not to discuss the case or reach any conclusion before hearing the full case and his legal instructions.
Publisher
Tribune Publishing Company, LLC