Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Rare Regulation FD Court Decision Highlights Risks of Calls with Analysts
by
Kaplan, Michael
, Beamon, Martine
, Cohen, Rob
, Truesdell, Richard
, Andres, Greg
, Chiu, Ning
in
Court decisions
/ Employees
/ Executives
/ Materiality
/ Trends
2023
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Rare Regulation FD Court Decision Highlights Risks of Calls with Analysts
by
Kaplan, Michael
, Beamon, Martine
, Cohen, Rob
, Truesdell, Richard
, Andres, Greg
, Chiu, Ning
in
Court decisions
/ Employees
/ Executives
/ Materiality
/ Trends
2023
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Rare Regulation FD Court Decision Highlights Risks of Calls with Analysts
Trade Publication Article
Rare Regulation FD Court Decision Highlights Risks of Calls with Analysts
2023
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
On September 8, Judge Engelmayer of the Southern District of New York denied motions for summary judgment filed by both the SEC and the defendants in litigation alleging Regulation FD violations. Because most Regulation FD cases brought by the SEC are settled, the court's evaluation of the claims and defenses provides insight for companies deciding whether certain communications with analysts might violate Regulation FD. The court cited the multiple points of evidence in support of scienter, including the number of analyst calls in which defendants disclosed confidential information; the variety of internal data that the defendants disclosed; the sustained duration (six weeks) of these disclosures and the general internal concern and persistence until the earnings estimates were brought down.
Publisher
Aspen Publishers, Inc
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.