Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background TB and HIV form a deadly synergy in much of the developing world, especially Africa. Interventions to reduce the impact of these diseases at community level are urgently needed. This paper presents the design of a community randomised trial to evaluate the impact of two complex interventions on the prevalence of tuberculosis (TB) in high HIV prevalence settings in Zambia and South Africa. Methods The interaction between TB and HIV is reviewed and possible interventions that could reduce the prevalence of TB in HIV-endemic populations are discussed. Two of these interventions are described in detail and the design of a 2 × 2 factorial community randomised trial to test these interventions is presented. The limitations and challenges of the design are identified and discussed. Conclusion There is an urgent need to reduce the prevalence of TB in communities highly affected by HIV. Potential interventions are complex and require innovative trial designs to provide the rigorous evidence needed to inform health policy makers and to ensure that resources are used optimally. Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN36729271

Prolonged diagnostic and treatment delays, particularly in settings experiencing concomitant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and tuberculosis (TB) epidemics, undermine global TB control efforts. Current TB control policy in South Africa, as organized through the National TB Control Programme (NTP), relies on the voluntary presentation of TB suspects to local clinics for diagnosis, i.e. passive case finding (PCF). In 2005 a participatory study suggested that popular interpretation and perception of TB within eight South African township sites in and around Cape Town, all carrying a high burden of HIV and undiagnosed TB, undermine PCF. Both people's association of TB with dirt and squalor, and the anticipation of HIV-related stigma, combine to impede TB diagnosis. Respondents conveyed TB as unavoidable; this perception is expressed in the context of vulnerability where so much—including dirt—is largely beyond the control of local residents. The lack of control has a disempowering effect, reducing the drive for seeking treatment. In addition, low confidence in patient confidentiality and anticipated HIV-related stigma act as direct deterrents to TB diagnosis and treatment. In conclusion, we wish to draw attention to high levels of disease stigma and vulnerability, and how these undermine PCF. Public health interventions that wish to improve case detection should aim to: (1) emphasize how early treatment improves outcome and can curb ongoing transmission; (2) combat a sense of communal vulnerability to TB; (3) address anticipated HIV-TB stigma; and (4) improve the quality of care provided at local diagnostic services, addressing low levels of patient confidentiality.

Results of an earlier analysis of a trial of the M72/AS01 candidate vaccine against showed that in infected adults, the vaccine provided 54.0% protection against active pulmonary tuberculosis disease, without evident safety concerns. We now report the results of the 3-year final analysis of efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity. From August 2014 through November 2015, we enrolled adults 18 to 50 years of age with infection (defined by positive results on interferon-γ release assay) without evidence of active tuberculosis disease at centers in Kenya, South Africa, and Zambia. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses of either M72/AS01 or placebo, administered 1 month apart. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of M72/AS01 to prevent active pulmonary tuberculosis disease according to the first case definition (bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis not associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection). Participants were followed for 3 years after the second dose. Participants with clinical suspicion of tuberculosis provided sputum samples for polymerase-chain-reaction assay, mycobacterial culture, or both. Humoral and cell-mediated immune responses were evaluated until month 36 in a subgroup of 300 participants. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of M72/AS01 or placebo. A total of 3575 participants underwent randomization, of whom 3573 received at least one dose of M72/AS01 or placebo, and 3330 received both planned doses. Among the 3289 participants in the according-to-protocol efficacy cohort, 13 of the 1626 participants in the M72/AS01 group, as compared with 26 of the 1663 participants in the placebo group, had cases of tuberculosis that met the first case definition (incidence, 0.3 vs. 0.6 cases per 100 person-years). The vaccine efficacy at month 36 was 49.7% (90% confidence interval [CI], 12.1 to 71.2; 95% CI, 2.1 to 74.2). Among participants in the M72/AS01 group, the concentrations of M72-specific antibodies and the frequencies of M72-specific CD4+ T cells increased after the first dose and were sustained throughout the follow-up period. Serious adverse events, potential immune-mediated diseases, and deaths occurred with similar frequencies in the two groups. Among adults infected with , vaccination with M72/AS01 elicited an immune response and provided protection against progression to pulmonary tuberculosis disease for at least 3 years. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals and Aeras; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01755598.).

A vaccine to interrupt the transmission of tuberculosis is needed. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial of the M72/AS01 tuberculosis vaccine in Kenya, South Africa, and Zambia. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative adults 18 to 50 years of age with latent M. tuberculosis infection (by interferon-γ release assay) were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive two doses of either M72/AS01 or placebo intramuscularly 1 month apart. Most participants had previously received the bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccine. We assessed the safety of M72/AS01 and its efficacy against progression to bacteriologically confirmed active pulmonary tuberculosis disease. Clinical suspicion of tuberculosis was confirmed with sputum by means of a polymerase-chain-reaction test, mycobacterial culture, or both. We report the primary analysis (conducted after a mean of 2.3 years of follow-up) of the ongoing trial. A total of 1786 participants received M72/AS01 and 1787 received placebo, and 1623 and 1660 participants in the respective groups were included in the according-to-protocol efficacy cohort. A total of 10 participants in the M72/AS01 group met the primary case definition (bacteriologically confirmed active pulmonary tuberculosis, with confirmation before treatment), as compared with 22 participants in the placebo group (incidence, 0.3 cases vs. 0.6 cases per 100 person-years). The vaccine efficacy was 54.0% (90% confidence interval [CI], 13.9 to 75.4; 95% CI, 2.9 to 78.2; P=0.04). Results for the total vaccinated efficacy cohort were similar (vaccine efficacy, 57.0%; 90% CI, 19.9 to 76.9; 95% CI, 9.7 to 79.5; P=0.03). There were more unsolicited reports of adverse events in the M72/AS01 group (67.4%) than in the placebo group (45.4%) within 30 days after injection, with the difference attributed mainly to injection-site reactions and influenza-like symptoms. Serious adverse events, potential immune-mediated diseases, and deaths occurred with similar frequencies in the two groups. M72/AS01 provided 54.0% protection for M. tuberculosis-infected adults against active pulmonary tuberculosis disease, without evident safety concerns. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals and Aeras; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01755598 .).

Mycobacterium tuberculosis remains a major global health threat. In this report, the M72/AS01 E vaccine provided approximately 50% protection against progression to active tuberculosis disease in adults.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a major global pathogen. In this trial in sub-Saharan Africa, a new vaccine was found to have 54% efficacy against the development of active pulmonary M. tuberculosis in infected adults.

TB and HIV form a deadly synergy in much of the developing world, especially Africa. Interventions to reduce the impact of these diseases at community level are urgently needed. This paper presents the design of a community randomised trial to evaluate the impact of two complex interventions on the prevalence of tuberculosis (TB) in high HIV prevalence settings in Zambia and South Africa. The interaction between TB and HIV is reviewed and possible interventions that could reduce the prevalence of TB in HIV-endemic populations are discussed. Two of these interventions are described in detail and the design of a 2 x 2 factorial community randomised trial to test these interventions is presented. The limitations and challenges of the design are identified and discussed. There is an urgent need to reduce the prevalence of TB in communities highly affected by HIV. Potential interventions are complex and require innovative trial designs to provide the rigorous evidence needed to inform health policy makers and to ensure that resources are used optimally. Number: ISRCTN36729271.

Background An effective tuberculosis (TB) vaccine is urgently needed to support the End TB Strategy to reduce the number of new TB cases by 80% by 2030. M72/AS01E candidate vaccine is an adjuvanted recombinant fusion protein derived from Mycobacterium tuberculosis Mtb32A and Mtb39A proteins. Methods We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial (NCT01755598) in Southern and Eastern Africa to assess M72/AS01E’s efficacy against bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary TB disease in HIV-seronegative (HIV–) adults aged 18–50 years infected with Mtb (defined by a positive IFN-γ release assay). Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive M72/AS01E or placebo at day D0 and D30. Reactogenicity, safety, immunogenicity were assessed, and incident TB disease measured from D30 postdose 2 up to ≥24 months for this analysis (follow-up ongoing up to 37 months). Efficacy against various TB disease case definitions (Figure 1) was estimated. Primary objective: efficacy against culture- or PCR-confirmed pulmonary TB disease in HIV– adults (case definition 1; success criterion: lower limit of 90% 2-sided CI >0%, power: 80%). Results Demographic characteristics were similar between M72/AS01E (1786) and placebo (1787) recipients. Efficacy against pulmonary TB disease case definition 1 was 54.0% (90% CI: 13.9, 75.4; P = 0.042); efficacy against other case definitions and a sensitivity analysis are shown in Figure 1. Leading solicited symptoms were pain, fatigue, and headache (Figure 2). In all recipients, unsolicited symptoms (D0–29) were more frequent after M72/AS01E (67.4%) than placebo (45.4%), mainly attributable to increased injection site reactions and flu-like symptoms. Serious adverse events (D0–month 7) incidences were similar between groups (M72/AS01E: 1.6%; placebo: 1.8%). During the study, 24 adults died (14 due to traumatic events); all deaths were unrelated to the trial. Conclusion M72/AS01E presents a clinically acceptable safety profile and significantly reduces bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary TB disease incidence in HIV– adults with latent Mtb infection. Funding. BMGF; Aeras; DFID UK; DGIS; AusAID; GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA. Disclosures O. Van Der Meeren, GSK: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. M. Hatherill, Aeras: Investigator, Research grant. R. J. Wilkinson, GSK: Grant Investigator, indirect funding. H. M. Ayles, GSK: Grant Investigator, Research grant. G. Henostroza, Aeras: Investigator, Grant recipient. M. A. Demoitié, GSK: owns stocks and is named inventor on patent applications relating to certain uses of M72/AS01E, Salary. T. Singh, GSK: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. E. J. Akite, GSK: Employee, Salary. A. K. Azam, GSK: Employee, Salary. A. Bollaerts, GSK: Employee, Salary. A. M. Ginsberg, GSK: Collaborator, Research support. BMGF: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient. UK DFID: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient. P. Gillard, GSK: Employee and Shareholder, Salary and stock. D. R. Tait, Aeras: Employee, Salary. GSK: Shareholder, Salary.

The growing population of adolescents and young people (AYP) aged 15 to 24 in sub-Saharan Africa face a high burden of HIV in many settings. Unintended pregnancies among adolescent girls in the region remain high. Nonetheless, the sexual and reproductive health (SRH) service needs of AYP have remained underserved. We conducted a cluster-randomised trial (CRT) to estimate the impact of community-based, peer-led SRH service provision on knowledge of HIV status and other SRH outcomes, including met need for contraceptives. Yathu Yathu was a cluster-randomised trial (CRT) conducted from 2019 to 2021 in 2 urban communities in Lusaka, Zambia. The communities were divided into 20 zones (approximately 2,350 AYP/zone) that were randomly allocated to the Yathu Yathu intervention or control arm. In each intervention zone, a community-based hub, staffed by peer support workers, was established to provide SRH services. In 2019, a census was conducted in all zones; all consenting AYP aged 15 to 24 were given a Yathu Yathu card, which allowed them to accrue points for accessing SRH services at the hub and health facility (intervention arm) or the health facility only (control arm). Points could be exchanged for rewards, thus acting as an incentive to use SRH services in both arms. We conducted a cross-sectional survey in 2021 to estimate the impact of Yathu Yathu on the primary outcome: knowledge of HIV status (self-reporting living with HIV or HIV testing in the last 12 months) and secondary outcomes, including use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the last 12 months, current use of antiretroviral therapy (ART), and met need for contraceptive services. The sampling was stratified on sex and age group, and we analysed data at cluster-level using a two-stage process recommended for CRTs with <15 clusters/arm. A total of 1,989 AYP consented to participate in the survey (50% male); consent was similar across arms (63% consent/arm). Across zones, knowledge of HIV status ranged from 63.6% to 81.2% in intervention zones and 35.4% to 63.0% in control zones. Adjusting for age, sex, and community, knowledge of HIV status was higher in the intervention arm compared to control (73.3% versus 48.4%, respectively, adjusted prevalence ratio (PR) 1.53 95% CI 1.36, 1.72; p < 0.001). By age and sex, results were similar. There was no evidence for impact on any secondary outcomes, including current use of ART and met need for contraceptives. There were no adverse events reported in either arm. A key limitation of our trial is that approximately 35% of the AYP randomly selected for participation in the endline survey could not be reached. Delivering community-based, peer-led SRH services increased knowledge of HIV status among AYP, both males and females, compared with the control arm. Scaling up the highly effective Yathu Yathu strategy has the potential to make a substantial contribution to increasing access to HIV prevention and care services for young people. However, additional implementation research is needed to understand how to improve uptake of broader SRH services, beyond uptake of HIV testing. ISRCTN75609016, clinicaltrials.gov number NCT04060420.