Explore the vast range of titles available.

Objective The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and distribution of bone metastases in treatment-naïve prostate cancer patients eligible for a metastatic workup using whole-body MRI, and to evaluate the results in light of current guidelines. Methods This single-institution, retrospective study included all patients with treatment-naïve prostate cancer referred to whole-body MRI during 2016 and 2017. All were eligible for a metastatic workup according to the guidelines: PSA > 20 ng/ml and/or Gleason grade group ≥ 3 and/or cT ≥ 2c and/or bone symptoms. The definition of a metastasis was descriptive and based on the original MRI reports. The anatomical location of metastases was registered. Results We included 161 patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer of which 36 (22%) were intermediate-risk and 125 (78%) were high-risk. The median age and PSA were 71 years (IQR 64–76) and 13 ng/ml (IQR 8–28), respectively. Bone metastases were found in 12 patients (7%, 95% CI: 4–13), and all were high-risk with Gleason grade group ≥ 4. The pelvis was affected in 4 patients, and the spine + pelvis in the remaining 8. No patients demonstrated metastases to the spine without concomitant metastases in the pelvis. Limitations are the small number of metastases and retrospective design. Conclusion This study suggests that the overall prevalence of bone metastases using the current guidelines for screening is quite low. No metastases were seen in the case of Gleason grade group ≤ 3, and further studies should investigate if it necessary to screen non-high-risk patients. Key Points • The overall prevalence of bone metastases was 7% in the case of newly diagnosed intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. • The prevalence in high-risk patients was 10%, and no metastases were seen in patients with Gleason grade group ≤ 3. • The pelvic skeleton is the main site, and no metastases occurred in the spine without concomitant pelvic metastases.

Purpose To assess the impact of 3D printed models of renal tumor on patient’s understanding of their conditions. Patient understanding of their medical condition and treatment satisfaction has gained increasing attention in medicine. Novel technologies such as additive manufacturing [also termed three-dimensional (3D) printing] may play a role in patient education. Methods A prospective pilot study was conducted, and seven patients with a primary diagnosis of kidney tumor who were being considered for partial nephrectomy were included after informed consent. All patients underwent four-phase multi-detector computerized tomography (MDCT) scanning from which renal volume data were extracted to create life-size patient-specific 3D printed models. Patient knowledge and understanding were evaluated before and after 3D model presentation. Patients’ satisfaction with their specific 3D printed model was also assessed through a visual scale. Results After viewing their personal 3D kidney model, patients demonstrated an improvement in understanding of basic kidney physiology by 16.7 % ( p  = 0.018), kidney anatomy by 50 % ( p  = 0.026), tumor characteristics by 39.3 % ( p  = 0.068) and the planned surgical procedure by 44.6 % ( p  = 0.026). Conclusion Presented herein is the initial clinical experience with 3D printing to facilitate patient’s pre-surgical understanding of their kidney tumor and surgery.

BackgroundThree-phase CT urography (CTU) is the gold standard for evaluating the upper urinary tract in patients with hematuria. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of CTU for detecting upper urothelial cell carcinomas (UCC) in patients with hematuria and negative cystoscopy. Secondly, we aimed to determine the tumor visibility on each CTU phase.Material and methodsThis retrospective study included all patients with hematuria referred to CTU after a negative cystoscopy during 2016 and 2017. The original CTU reports were dichotomized as negative or positive. All patient charts were reviewed after a minimum of 18-month follow-up in order to register missed cancers. The results of biopsies and clinical follow-up were used as the reference standard. Two reviewers retrospectively evaluated the tumor visibility of each CT sequence in all true-positive CTUs.ResultsWe included 376 patients with hematuria who underwent CTU after a negative cystoscopy. Macroscopic and microscopic hematuria occurred in 87% (327) and 13% (49), respectively. The incidence of upper urothelial cell carcinoma was 1.9% (7), and the sensitivity of CTU was 100% (95% CI, 59–100), specificity was 99% (95% CI, 98–100), positive predictive value was 88% (95% CI, 47–99), and negative predictive value was 100% (95% CI, 99–100). The accuracy was 99% (95% CI, 90–100). All UCCs were visible on the nephrographic phase for both reviewers.ConclusionCTU is highly accurate for detecting upper UCCs. All cases were seen on the nephrographic phase. This suggests that the CTU protocol can be simplified.Key Points• CT urography is highly accurate for detecting upper urothelial cell carcinomas.• All cancers were seen on the nephrographic phase.• All cancers were detected in patients with macroscopic hematuria.

BackgroundA 68-year-old man died of cerebral arterial embolism 6 days after transrectal prostate biopsy with a single p.o. dose of trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) as prophylaxis. The case precipitated analysis of local antibiotic resistance and complication rates.Materials and methodsData on E. coli resistance from Oslo University Hospital and national data on hospitalizations and mortality after biopsy were retrieved from local microbiology files and the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR) 2011–2017.ResultsUrine E. coli resistance against TMP-SMX increased from 35% in 2013 to more than 60% in 2015. For ciprofloxacin, the resistance increased from 15% in 2013 to about 45% in 2016. The highest annual E. coli resistance in blood cultures for TMP-SMX and ciprofloxacin was 37% and 28%, respectively. 10% of patients were hospitalized with a diagnosis of infection within the first 60 days after biopsy and there was a relative increase in mortality rate of 261% within the first 30 days. Due to the severity of the figures, the story and the NPR data were published in Norway’s leading newspaper and were succeeded by a series of chronicles and commentaries.ConclusionsSeveral critical points of the biopsy procedure were not performed according to current standards. We believe that the patient might have died of septic embolism after biopsy. As a result of the findings and the debate, local practice was changed from transrectal to transperineal prostate biopsies.

Objectives To evaluate the effects of center experience and a variety of patient- and procedure-related factors on patient radiation exposure during prostatic artery embolization (PAE) in three Scandinavian centers with different PAE protocols and levels of experience. Understanding factors that influence radiation exposure is crucial in effective patient selection and procedural planning. Methods Data were collected retrospectively for 352 consecutive PAE procedures from January 2015 to June 2020 at the three centers. Dose area product (DAP (Gy·cm 2 )) was selected as the primary outcome measure of radiation exposure. Multiple patient- and procedure-related explanatory variables were collected and correlated with the outcome variable. A multiple linear regression model was built to determine significant predictors of increased or decreased radiation exposure as reflected by DAP. Results There was considerable variation in DAP between the centers. Intended unilateral PAE ( p  = 0.03) and each 10 additional patients treated ( p  = 0.02) were significant predictors of decreased DAP. Conversely, increased patient body mass index (BMI, p  < 0.001), fluoroscopy time ( p  < 0.001), and number of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) acquisitions ( p  < 0.001) were significant predictors of increased DAP. Conclusions To minimize patient radiation exposure during PAE radiologists may, in collaboration with clinicians, consider unilateral embolization, pre-interventional CTA for procedure planning, using predominantly anteroposterior (AP) projections, and limiting the use of cone-beam CT (CBCT) and fluoroscopy. Key Points • Growing center experience and intended unilateral embolization decrease patient radiation exposure during prostatic artery embolization. • Patient BMI, fluoroscopy time, and number of DSA acquisitions are associated with increased DAP during procedures. • Large variation in radiation exposure between the centers may reflect the use of CTA before and CBCT during the procedure.

The benefit of antibiotic prophylaxis is uncertain when performing transperineal prostate biopsies. Judicious use of antibiotics is required as antimicrobial resistance increases worldwide. We aimed to assess whether antibiotic prophylaxis can be omitted when performing transperineal prostate biopsies under local anaesthesia as an outpatient procedure. In this randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial, we aimed to enrol all patients with a suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing transperineal prostate biopsies at two hospitals in Norway and Germany. Patients with a high risk of infection or ongoing infection were excluded. Patients were randomised (1:1) to receive intramuscular (in Norway) or intravenous (in Germany) 1·5 g cefuroxime antibiotic prophylaxis or not. Follow-up assessments were done after 2 weeks and 2 months. The primary outcome was rate of sepsis or urinary tract infections requiring hospitalisation within 2 months. The secondary outcome was the rate of urinary tract infections not requiring hospitalisation. These outcomes were assessed in all eligible randomly allocated participants with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of 4%. Biopsies were performed using an MRI–transrectal ultrasound fusion transperineal technique under local anaesthesia. Patients with a positive MRI underwent 2–4 biopsies per target; in addition, 8–12 systematic biopsies were performed in biopsy naive and MRI-negative patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04146142. Between Nov 11, 2019, and Feb 23, 2021, 792 patients were referred for biopsy, of whom 555 (70%) were randomly allocated to treatment groups. 277 (50%) patients received antibiotic prophylaxis and 276 (50%) did not; two (<1%) patients were excluded after randomisation because of unknown allergy to study drug. Sepsis or urinary tract infections requiring hospitalisation occurred in no patients given antibiotic prophylaxis (0%, 95% CI 0 to 1·37) or not given antibiotic prophylaxis (0%, 0 to 1·37; difference 0% [95% CI –1·37 to 1·37]). Urinary tract infections not requiring hospitalisation occurred in one patient given antibiotic prophylaxis (0·36%, 95% CI 0·01 to 2·00) and three patients not given antibiotic prophylaxis (1·09%, 0·37 to 3·15; difference 0·73% [95% CI –1·08 to 2·81]). The number needed to treat with antibiotic prophylaxis to avoid one infection was 137. The non-inferiority margin of 4% was not exceeded, suggesting rates of infections were not higher in patients not receiving antibiotic prophylaxis before transperineal prostate biopsy than in those receiving it. Therefore, antibiotic prophylaxis might be omitted in this population. Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway and Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, Berlin, Germany.

[...]they were underpowered to give any conclusion on the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis. The idea of post-hoc sample size estimation and power analyses is fundamentally flawed and it is highly inappropriate to do such analyses when interpreting observed results.4 The power of observed effects is evident from the width of the confidence intervals or the size of the p values. [...]Singhal and colleagues asked whether it is always necessary to conduct an adequately powered trial to change clinical practice. Because current guidelines and most clinicians continue to recommend and use antibiotic prophylaxis despite knowledge obtained from single-arm studies, the obvious answer is yes.

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate three indirect MRI signs for predicting extraprostatic disease in patients referred to radical prostatectomy: index tumor volume (MTV), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and tumor contact length (TCL).Materials and methodsThis prospective study included 183 patients with biopsy proven prostate cancer. In all patients the MTV (ml), ADC (× 10−5 mm2/s) and TCL (mm) of the index tumor were registered at the preoperative MRI. Whole-mounted microscopical examination classified each patient as having either localized- or extraprostatic disease. The Youden index was used to identify the optimal cut-off values for predicting extraprostatic disease. Univariate regression analyses were conducted to estimate the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results were stratified upon zonal location of the index tumor.ResultsExtraprostatic disease was identified in 103 (56%) patients. The risk of extraprostatic disease was nine times higher in peripheral zone tumors with ADC ≤ 89 (OR 9.1, 95% CI 4.2–19.6), five times higher in MTV ≥ 0.9 ml (OR 5.5, 95% CI 2.6–11.4) and five times higher in case of TCL ≥ 14 mm (OR 4.9, 95% CI 2.3–10.2). None of the indirect MRI signs could predict extraprostatic disease for transition zone tumors.ConclusionThe MTV, ADC and TCL are all significant predictors of extraprostatic disease for peripheral zone tumors, while none of the indirect signs were useful for transition zone tumors.

Objective The European Association of Urology (EAU) recommends a bone scan for newly diagnosed unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. We aimed to validate the screening criteria for bone metastases in patients with treatment-naïve prostate cancer. Methods This single-center retrospective study included all patients with treatment-naïve unfavorable intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer. All underwent MRI of the lumbar column (T2Dixon) and pelvis (3DT2w, DWI, and T2 Dixon). The presence and location of lymph node and bone metastases were registered according to risk groups and radiological (rad) T-stage. The risk of lymph node metastases was assessed by odds ratio (OR). Results We included 390 patients, of which 68% were high-risk and 32% were unfavorable intermediate-risk. In the high-risk group, the rate of regional- and non-regional lymph node metastases was 11% and 6%, respectively, and the rate of bone metastases was 10%. In the unfavorable intermediate-risk group, the rate of regional- and non-regional lymph node metastases was 4% and 0.8%, respectively, and the rate of bone metastases was 0.8%. Metastases occurred exclusively in the lumbar column in 0.5% of all patients, in the pelvis in 4%, and the pelvis and lumbar column in 3%. All patients with bone metastases had radT3-4, and patients with radT3-4 showed a four-fold increased risk of lymph node metastases (OR 4.48, 95% CI: 2.1–9.5). Conclusion Bone metastases were found in 10% with high-risk prostate cancer and 0.8% with unfavorable intermediate-risk. Therefore, we question the recommendation to screen the unfavorable intermediate-risk group for bone metastases. Key Points • The rate of bone metastases was 10% in high-risk patients and 0.8% in the unfavorable intermediate-risk group. • The rate of lymph-node metastases was 17% in high-risk patients and 5% in the unfavorable intermediate-risk group. • No bone metastases were seen in radiologically localized disease.