Explore the vast range of titles available.

In the era of targeted therapy based on genomic alterations, the treatment strategy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been changing. Before systemic treatment initiation, determination of tumour genomic status for KRAS and NRAS, BRAFV600E mutations, ERBB2, and microsatellite instability and/or mismatch repair (MMR) status is recommended. In patients with deficient MMR and BRAFV600E mCRC, randomized phase III trials have established the efficacy of pembrolizumab as first-line therapy and the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab as second-line or third-line therapy. In addition, new agents have been actively developed in other rare molecular fractions such as ERBB2 alterations and KRASG12C mutations. In March 2022, the combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for ERBB2-positive mCRC was approved in Japan, thereby combining real-world evidence from the SCRUM-Japan Registry. As the populations are highly fragmented owing to rare genomic alterations, various strategies in clinical development are expected. Clinical development of a tumour-agnostic approach, such as NTRK fusion and tumour mutational burden, has successfully introduced corresponding drugs to clinical practice. Considering the difficulty of randomized trials owing to cost–benefit and rarity, a promising solution could be real-world evidence utilized as an external control from the molecular-based disease registry.The therapeutic landscape of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is changing. This Review provides a comprehensive overview discussing the current mCRC advances in precision oncology and suggests a treatment strategy for mCRC with rare genomic alterations.

BackgroundHyperprogressive disease (HPD) during treatment with anti-programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 monoclonal antibodies has anecdotally been reported in some types of cancers, but is not well-characterized in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).MethodsTotal 62 AGC patients treated with nivolumab in a single institution from September 2017 to April 2018 were enrolled in this study. Tumor responses were assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, and HPD was defined as ≥ two fold increase in tumor growth rate. Clinicopathological and molecular characteristics associated with HPD were also investigated.ResultsThirteen of 62 patients (21%) developed HPD after nivolumab treatment. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were significantly shorter in patients with HPD than in patients without HPD (median OS: 2.3 months vs. not reached, P < 0.001; median PFS: 0.7 months vs. 2.4 months, P < 0.001). Liver metastases (77% vs. 41%), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 1 or 2 (77% vs. 29%), and a large sum of target lesion diameters at baseline (median 104.2 mm vs. 44.9 mm) were significantly associated with HPD. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) level significantly increased in the first 4 weeks in only patients with HPD.ConclusionsHPD was observed in AGC patients treated with nivolumab and correlated with some clinicopathological characteristics. Elevations in ANC and CRP levels upon treatment might indicate HPD.

Comprehensive genomic profiling enables the detection of genomic biomarkers in advanced solid tumors. However, efficient patient screening for the success of precision oncology remains challenging due to substantial barriers, such as genotyping costs and accessibility to matched therapies. To address these challenges, we launched GI‐SCREEN, a nationwide gastrointestinal cancer genomic screening project within the SCRUM‐Japan network in 2015 with the specific purpose of matching patients with a diverse portfolio of affiliated interventional targeted therapy trials. Subsequently, we initiated the molecular profiling projects GOZILA, MONSTAR‐SCREEN‐1, and MONSTAR‐SCREEN‐2, which incorporate tissue and plasma multiomics approaches to accurately identify patients with advanced solid tumors who would benefit from matched therapies. These projects have led to a significant increase in patient participation in targeted clinical trials and the approval of several therapeutics and companion diagnostics. Additionally, clinicogenomic analyses utilizing the SCRUM‐Japan database have provided new insights into the molecular mechanisms of advanced solid tumors. In this review, we describe the path to the realization of cancer precision medicine for patients with advanced solid tumors based on the SCRUM‐Japan GI‐SCREEN and MONSTAR‐SCREEN platforms. Recent advances in precision oncology have highlighted the necessity of performing genotyping for patients with advanced cancer to select appropriate therapies. However, the pace of innovation in precision oncology is limited by the logistical hindrance of patient identification and the need for large‐scale cancer genomic screening platforms. In the submitted article, we reviewed the development of the SCRUM‐Japan GI‐SCREEN and MONSTAR‐SCREEN Project, a nationwide cancer genomic screening project in Japan, conducted to facilitate precision oncology.

Key Points Preclinical models provide evidence of cancer stem cells (CSCs) contributing to cancer proliferation, relapse and metastasis; this theory is being examined and validated in the clinical setting, currently in advanced malignancies Over the past few years, new investigational agents have been developed to block the Notch, Hedgehog (HH) or Wnt signalling pathways for targeting CSCs To date, robust antitumour activity has not been observed by targeting CSCs using Notch, HH or Wnt inhibitors, either as single agents or in combination with standard chemotherapy, in clinical trials Combination approaches to overcome the crosstalk among Notch, HH and Wnt pathways, as well as other signalling pathways, has been examined mostly in preclinical models, with promising results The success of the combination therapy in clinical trials might depend on CSC–tumour microenvironment interactions, perhaps in the context of the genotypes and phenotypes of the bulk tumour, CSCs, and the tumour microenvironment A number of clinical trials have incorporated surrogate CSC assays to measure the effects of an investigational agent on CSCs, but further technological improvements in assays are needed Cancer stem cell (CSC) populations are increasingly recognized in most malignancies and are hypothesized to contribute to cancer proliferation, relapse, and metastasis. Thus, the highly conserved stem-cell signal transduction pathways involved in development and tissue homeostasis that are frequently active in CSCs represent prime targets for targeted therapies against this characteristically treatment-resistant and highly tumorigenic cell population. This Review provides a update on the clinical development of therapies targeting Wnt, Notch, and Hedgehog, three prominent stem-cell signalling pathways that are upregulated in CSCs. During the past decade, cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been increasingly identified in many malignancies. Although the origin and plasticity of these cells remain controversial, tumour heterogeneity and the presence of small populations of cells with stem-like characteristics is established in most malignancies. CSCs display many features of embryonic or tissue stem cells, and typically demonstrate persistent activation of one or more highly conserved signal transduction pathways involved in development and tissue homeostasis, including the Notch, Hedgehog (HH), and Wnt pathways. CSCs generally have slow growth rates and are resistant to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Thus, new treatment strategies targeting these pathways to control stem-cell replication, survival and differentiation are under development. Herein, we provide an update on the latest advances in the clinical development of such approaches, and discuss strategies for overcoming CSC-associated primary or acquired resistance to cancer treatment. Given the crosstalk between the different embryonic developmental signalling pathways, as well as other pathways, designing clinical trials that target CSCs with rational combinations of agents to inhibit possible compensatory escape mechanisms could be of particular importance. We also share our views on the future directions for targeting CSCs to advance the clinical development of these classes of agents.

Comprehensive genomic profiling enables genomic biomarker detection in advanced solid tumors. Here, to evaluate the utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) genotyping, we compare trial enrollment using ctDNA sequencing in 1,687 patients with advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancer in SCRUM-Japan GOZILA (no. UMIN000016343), an observational ctDNA-based screening study, to enrollment using tumor tissue sequencing in the same centers and network (GI-SCREEN, 5,621 patients). ctDNA genotyping significantly shortened the screening duration (11 versus 33 days, P  < 0.0001) and improved the trial enrollment rate (9.5 versus 4.1%, P  < 0.0001) without compromising treatment efficacy compared to tissue genotyping. We also describe the clonal architecture of ctDNA profiles in ~2,000 patients with advanced GI cancer, which reinforces the relevance of many targetable oncogenic drivers and highlights multiple new drivers as candidates for clinical development. ctDNA genotyping has the potential to accelerate innovation in precision medicine and its delivery to individual patients. An observational study on a large cohort of patients with gastrointestinal cancer demonstrates the utility of ctDNA analysis for accelerating the enrollment of patients in clinical trials with no accompanying deterioration in treatment efficacy.

Microsatellite Instability (MSI) status is an established predictive biomarker for the treatment of the anti‐programmed death 1 (PD‐1) antibody. The current approach to determine the MSI status in tumours requires matched normal DNA. Some mononucleotide microsatellite markers are known to have few variant alleles in both Caucasians and Asians. Therefore, the length of these microsatellite makers is almost confined within the quasi‐monomorphic variation range (QMVR). Considering the application of MSI testing for various types of cancers, a simple, sensitive and inexpensive method is desired. This study assessed the clinical utility of the QMVR for determining the MSI status in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The study enrolled 435 patients with mCRC. The concordance of the MSI status in mCRC between the standard method using tumour DNA plus matched normal DNA and the testing method using only tumour DNA was evaluated. Eleven (2.5%) MSI‐high cases were detected by both the standard and testing methods. The sensitivity and specificity of the testing method were both 100%, indicating complete concordance between the methods. Among the mononucleotide markers, three and two patients showed discordance for NR‐21 and BAT‐25, respectively. Results from MSI testing with normal tissue indicated that four of five patients had rare germline variants outside the QMVR. For BAT‐26, NR‐24 and MONO‐27, all patients showed complete concordance. Using the QMVR, the MSI status of mCRC can be determined without matched normal DNA. We assessed the utility of the Quasi‐Monomorphic Variation Range (QMVR) for determining the Microsatellite Instability (MSI) status in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The MSI status between the standard method using tumour DNA plus matched normal DNA and the testing method using only tumour DNA was completely concordant. By using the QMVR, MSI status of mCRC can be determined without matched normal DNA.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is the fraction of cell-free DNA in patient blood that originates from a tumor. Advances in DNA sequencing technologies and our understanding of the molecular biology of tumors have increased interest in exploiting ctDNA to facilitate detection of molecular residual disease (MRD). Analysis of ctDNA as a promising MRD biomarker of solid malignancies has a central role in precision medicine initiatives exemplified by our CIRCULATE-Japan project involving patients with resectable colorectal cancer. Notably, the project underscores the prognostic significance of the ctDNA status at 4 weeks post-surgery and its correlation to adjuvant therapy efficacy at interim analysis. This substantiates the hypothesis that MRD is a critical prognostic indicator of relapse in patients with colorectal cancer. Despite remarkable advancements, challenges endure, primarily attributable to the exceedingly low ctDNA concentration in peripheral blood, particularly in scenarios involving low tumor shedding and the intrinsic error rates of current sequencing technologies. These complications necessitate more sensitive and sophisticated assays to verify the clinical utility of MRD across all solid tumors. Whole genome sequencing (WGS)-based tumor-informed MRD assays have recently demonstrated the ability to detect ctDNA in the parts-per-million range. This review delineates the current landscape of MRD assays, highlighting WGS-based approaches as the forefront technique in ctDNA analysis. Additionally, it introduces our upcoming endeavor, WGS-based pan-cancer MRD detection via ctDNA, in our forthcoming project, SCRUM-Japan MONSTAR-SCREEN-3.

Although comprehensive genomic profiling has become standard in oncology for advanced solid tumors, the full potential of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based profiling in capturing tumor heterogeneity and guiding therapy selection remains underexploited, marked by a scarcity of evidence on its clinical impact and the assessment of intratumoral heterogeneity. The GOZILA study, a nationwide, prospective observational ctDNA profiling study, previously demonstrated higher clinical trial enrollment rates using liquid biopsy compared with tissue screening. This updated analysis of 4,037 patients further delineates the clinical utility of ctDNA profiling in advanced solid tumors, showcasing a significant enhancement in patient outcomes with a 24% match rate for targeted therapy. Patients treated with matched targeted therapy based on ctDNA profiling demonstrated significantly improved overall survival compared with those receiving unmatched therapy (hazard ratio, 0.54). Notably, biomarker clonality and adjusted plasma copy number were identified as predictors of therapeutic efficacy, reinforcing the value of ctDNA in reflecting tumor heterogeneity for precise treatment decisions. These new insights into the relationship between ctDNA characteristics and treatment outcomes advance our understanding beyond the initial enrollment benefits. Our findings advocate for the broader adoption of ctDNA-guided treatment, signifying an advancement in precision oncology and improving survival outcomes in advanced solid tumors. In the observational SCRUM-Japan GOZILA study, after a median follow-up of 11 months, patients with metastatic gastrointestinal tumors who received biomarker-matched therapies based on circulating tumor DNA profiling showed a greater clinical benefit than those receiving unmatched therapy.

Molecular testing to determine optimal therapies is essential for managing patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). In October 2022, the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology published the 5th edition of the Molecular Testing Guideline for Colorectal Cancer Treatment. In this guideline, in patients with unresectable CRC, RAS/BRAF V600E mutational and mismatch repair tests are strongly recommended prior to first‐line chemotherapy to select optimal first‐ and second‐line therapies. In addition, HER2 testing is strongly recommended because the pertuzumab plus trastuzumab combination is insured after fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan in Japan. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)‐based RAS testing is also strongly recommended to assess the indications for the readministration of anti‐EGFR antibodies. Both tissue‐ and ctDNA‐based comprehensive genomic profiling tests are strongly recommended to assess the indications for targeted molecular drugs, although they are currently insured in patients with disease progression after receiving standard chemotherapy (or in whom disease progression is expected in the near future). Mutational and mismatch repair testing is strongly recommended for patients with resectable CRC, and RAS/BRAF V600E mutation testing is recommended to estimate the risk of recurrence. Mutational and mismatch repair and BRAF testing are also strongly recommended for screening for Lynch syndrome. Circulating tumor DNA‐based minimal residual disease (MRD) testing is strongly recommended for estimating the risk of recurrence based on clinical evidence, although MRD testing was not approved in Japan at the time of the publication of this guideline. This report is a digest of the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology Clinical Guidelines: Molecular Testing in Colorectal Cancer Treatment, Fifth Edition.

Background OncoBEAM TM RAS CRC kit using BEAMing technology is a circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) test for detecting plasma RAS mutational status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We conducted a multicentre, prospective study to investigate the concordance of the RAS mutational status between plasma ctDNA and tumour tissue DNA. Methods mCRC patients without prior anti-EGFR antibodies or regorafenib treatment were enroled. Plasma- and tissue-based RAS mutational status were determined by BEAMing, respectively. Results A total of 280 patients from eight institutions were eligible. The overall agreement between plasma- and tissue-based analyses was 86.4%, with a positive percent agreement of 82.1% and negative percent agreement of 90.4%. From logistic regression analysis, lung metastasis alone indicated the most significant factor associated with discordance. The agreement between plasma- and tissue-based analyses was 64.5% in patients with lung metastasis alone ( n  = 31) indicating lower amount of ctDNA. Among the cases with lung metastasis alone, all plasma- and tissue-based analyses were perfectly concordant in cases with ≥20 mm of maximum lesion diameter or ≥10 lesions. Conclusion The clinical validity of OncoBEAM TM RAS CRC kit was confirmed. Careful attention should be paid for mCRC patients with lung metastases alone having fewer metastases or smaller diameter lesions.