Explore the vast range of titles available.

With the FDA approval of larotrectinib, NTRK fusion assessment has recently become a standard part of management for patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancers. Unlike somatic mutation assessment, the detection of NTRK fusions is not straightforward, and various assays exist at the DNA, RNA, and protein level. Here, we investigate the performance of immunohistochemistry and DNA-based next-generation sequencing to indirectly or directly detect NTRK fusions relative to an RNA-based next-generation sequencing approach in the largest cohort of NTRK fusion positive solid tumors to date. A retrospective analysis of 38,095 samples from 33,997 patients sequenced by a targeted DNA-based next-generation sequencing panel (MSK-IMPACT), 2189 of which were also examined by an RNA-based sequencing assay (MSK-Fusion), identified 87 patients with oncogenic NTRK1-3 fusions. All available institutional NTRK fusion positive cases were assessed by pan-Trk immunohistochemistry along with a cohort of control cases negative for NTRK fusions by next-generation sequencing. DNA-based sequencing showed an overall sensitivity and specificity of 81.1% and 99.9%, respectively, for the detection of NTRK fusions when compared to RNA-based sequencing. False negatives occurred when fusions involved breakpoints not covered by the assay. Immunohistochemistry showed overall sensitivity of 87.9% and specificity of 81.1%, with high sensitivity for NTRK1 (96%) and NTRK2 (100%) fusions and lower sensitivity for NTRK3 fusions (79%). Specificity was 100% for carcinomas of the colon, lung, thyroid, pancreas, and biliary tract. Decreased specificity was seen in breast and salivary gland carcinomas (82% and 52%, respectively), and positive staining was often seen in tumors with neural differentiation. Both sensitivity and specificity were poor in sarcomas. Selection of the appropriate assay for NTRK fusion detection therefore depends on tumor type and genes involved, as well as consideration of other factors such as available material, accessibility of various clinical assays, and whether comprehensive genomic testing is needed concurrently.

Recently discovered DNAJB1-PRKACA oncogenic fusions have been considered diagnostic for fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma. In this study, we describe six pancreatobiliary neoplasms with PRKACA fusions, five of which harbor the DNAJB1-PRKACA fusion. All neoplasms were subjected to a hybridization capture-based next-generation sequencing assay (MSK-IMPACT), which enables the identification of sequence mutations, copy number alterations, and selected structural rearrangements involving ≥410 genes ( n  = 6) and/or to a custom targeted, RNA-based panel (MSK-Fusion) that utilizes Archer Anchored Multiplex PCR technology and next-generation sequencing to detect gene fusions in 62 genes ( n  = 2). Selected neoplasms also underwent FISH analysis, albumin mRNA in-situ hybridization, and arginase-1 immunohistochemical labeling ( n  = 3). Five neoplasms were pancreatic, and one arose in the intrahepatic bile ducts. All revealed at least focal oncocytic morphology: three cases were diagnosed as intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasms, and three as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms with mixed oncocytic and pancreatobiliary or gastric features. Four cases had an invasive carcinoma component composed of oncocytic cells. Five cases revealed DNAJB1-PRKACA fusions and one revealed an ATP1B1-PRKACA fusion. None of the cases tested were positive for albumin or arginase-1. Our data prove that DNAJB1-PRKACA fusion is neither exclusive nor diagnostic for fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma, and caution should be exercised in diagnosing liver tumors with DNAJB1-PRKACA fusions as fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma, particularly if a pancreatic lesion is present. Moreover, considering DNAJB1-PRKACA fusions lead to upregulated protein kinase activity and that this upregulated protein kinase activity has a significant role in tumorigenesis of fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma, protein kinase inhibition could have therapeutic potential in the treatment of these pancreatobiliary neoplasms as well, once a suitable drug is developed.

Mechanistic understanding of oncogenic variants facilitates the development and optimization of treatment strategies. We recently identified in-frame, tandem duplication of EGFR exons 18 - 25, which causes EGFR Kinase Domain Duplication (EGFR-KDD). Here, we characterize the prevalence of ERBB family KDDs across multiple human cancers and evaluate the functional biochemistry of EGFR-KDD as it relates to pathogenesis and potential therapeutic intervention. We provide computational and experimental evidence that EGFR-KDD functions by forming asymmetric EGF-independent intra-molecular and EGF-dependent inter-molecular dimers. Time-resolved fluorescence microscopy and co-immunoprecipitation reveals EGFR-KDD can form ligand-dependent inter-molecular homo- and hetero-dimers/multimers. Furthermore, we show that inhibition of EGFR-KDD activity is maximally achieved by blocking both intra- and inter-molecular dimerization. Collectively, our findings define a previously unrecognized model of EGFR dimerization, providing important insights for the understanding of EGFR activation mechanisms and informing personalized treatment of patients with tumors harboring EGFR-KDD. Finally, we establish ERBB KDDs as recurrent oncogenic events in multiple cancers. An EGFR mutant with kinase domain duplication (EGFR-KDD) was previously identified in an index patient, but the functional and therapeutic implications remain unclear. Here, the authors show that KDD occurs in other ErbB receptors in multiple cancers, and characterize the mechanism and inhibition of EGFR-KDD.

Immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair protein expression is widely used as a surrogate for microsatellite instability status—an important signature for immunotherapy and germline testing. There are no systematic analyses examining the sensitivity of immunohistochemistry for microsatellite instability-high status. Mismatch repair immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability testing were performed routinely as clinically validated assays. We classified germline/somatic mutation types as truncating (nonsense, frameshift, and in/del) versus missense and predicted pathogenicity of the latter. Discordant cases were compared with concordant groups: microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient for mutation comparison and microsatellite stable/mismatch repair-proficient for immunohistochemical comparison. 32 of 443 (7%) microsatellite instability-high cases had immunohistochemistry. Four additional microsatellite instability-high research cases had discordant immunohistochemistry. Of 36 microsatellite instability-high cases with discordant immunohistochemistry, 30 were mismatch repair-proficient, while six (five MLH1 and one MSH2) retained expression of the defective mismatch repair protein and lost its partner. In microsatellite instability-high tumors with discordant immunohistochemistry, we observed an enrichment in deleterious missense mutations over truncating mutations, with 69% (25/36) of cases having pathogenic germline or somatic missense mutations, as opposed to only 19% (7/36) in a matched microsatellite instability-high group with concordant immunohistochemistry ( p  = 0.0007).  In microsatellite instability-high cases with discordant immunohistochemistry and MLH1 or PMS2 abnormalities, less cells showed expression ( p  = 0.015 and p  = 0.00095, respectively) compared with microsatellite stable/mismatch repair-proficient cases. Tumor mutation burden, MSIsensor score, and truncating mismatch repair gene mutations were similar between microsatellite instability-high cases with concordant versus discordant immunohistochemical expression. Approximately 6% of microsatellite instability-high cases have retained mismatch repair protein expression and would be missed by immunohistochemistry-based testing, hindering patient access to immunotherapy. Another 1% of microsatellite instability-high cases show isolated loss of the defective gene’s dimerization partner, which may lead to germline testing of the wrong gene. These cases are enriched for pathogenic mismatch repair missense mutations.

High-grade histologic transformation of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) is rare. Here, we describe the clinicopathologic features and gene fusion status of 12 cases (11 primary uterine corpus and 1 primary vaginal), 11 diagnosed prospectively from 2016, and 1 retrospectively collected. Targeted RNA sequencing and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization was employed in all cases. High-grade transformation was seen at the time of initial diagnosis in eight patients and at the time of recurrence in four patients, 4–11 years after initial diagnosis of LGESS. High-grade morphology consisted of generally uniform population of round to epithelioid cells with enlarged nuclei one to two times larger than a lymphocyte, visible nucleoli, and increased mitotic index (range, 6–30; median, 16 per 10 high-power fields); there was often an associated sclerotic and/or myxoid stroma. Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and CD10 expression was absent or significantly decreased (compared with the low-grade component) in the high-grade foci of five tumors. One tumor demonstrated positive (diffuse and strong) cyclin D1 and BCOR staining. p53 staining was wild type in both components of all eight tumors tested. JAZF1-SUZ12 (n = 6), JAZF1-PHF1 (n = 3), EPC1-PHF1, (n = 1), or BRD8-PHF1 (n = 1) fusions were detected in 11 tumors; no fusions were found in one by targeted RNA sequencing. Patients presented with FIGO stages I (n = 4), II (n = 4), III (n = 1), and IV disease (n = 2). Median overall survival calculated from the time of histologic transformation was 22 months (range, 8 months to 8 years) with five patients who died of disease 8–18 months after transformation. High-grade transformation may occur in LGESS with JAZF1 and PHF1 rearrangements at the time of or years after initial diagnosis. Such high-grade transformation is characterized by nuclear enlargement, prominent nucleoli, and increased mitotic index compared with typical LGESS. Histologic high-grade transformation may herald aggressive behavior.

Stably acquired mutations in hematopoietic cells represent substrates of selection that may lead to clonal hematopoiesis (CH), a common state in cancer patients that is associated with a heightened risk of leukemia development. Owing to technical and sample size limitations, most CH studies have characterized gene mutations or mosaic chromosomal alterations (mCAs) individually. Here we leverage peripheral blood sequencing data from 32,442 cancer patients to jointly characterize gene mutations ( n  = 14,789) and mCAs ( n  = 383) in CH. Recurrent composite genotypes resembling known genetic interactions in leukemia genomes underlie 23% of all detected autosomal alterations, indicating that these selection mechanisms are operative early in clonal evolution. CH with composite genotypes defines a patient group at high risk of leukemia progression (3-year cumulative incidence 14.6%, CI: 7–22%). Multivariable analysis identifies mCA as an independent risk factor for leukemia development (HR = 14, 95% CI: 6–33, P  < 0.001). Our results suggest that mCA should be considered in conjunction with gene mutations in the surveillance of patients at risk of hematologic neoplasms. Patients with solid cancers have high rates of clonal haematopoiesis associated with increased risk of secondary leukemias. Here, by using peripheral blood sequencing data from patients with solid non-hematologic cancer, the authors profile the landscape of mosaic chromosomal alterations and gene mutations, defining patients at high risk of leukemia progression.

High-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma likely encompasses underrecognized tumors harboring genetic abnormalities besides YWHAE–NUTM2 fusion. Triggered by three initial endometrial stromal sarcomas with ZC3H7B–BCOR fusion characterized by high-grade morphology and aggressive clinical behavior, we herein investigate the clinicopathologic features of this genetic subset by expanding the analysis to 17 such tumors. All of them occurred in adult women with a median age of 54 (range, 28–71) years. They were predominantly based in the endomyometrium and demonstrated tongue-like and/or pushing myometrial invasion. Most were uniformly cellular and displayed haphazard fascicles of spindle cells with mild to moderate nuclear atypia. Myxoid matrix was seen in 14 of 17 (82%) tumors, and collagen plaques were seen in 8 (47%). The mitotic index was ≥10 mitotic figures/10 high-power fields (HPFs) in 14 of 17 (82%) tumors with a median of 14.5 mitotic figures/10 HPFs. No foci of conventional or variant low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma were seen. All tumors expressed CD10 with only limited or absent desmin, SMA and/or h-caldesmon staining. ER and PR expression in >5% of cells was seen in 4 of 12 (33%) tumors. Diffuse cyclin D1 and BCOR immunoreactivity was present in 7 of 8 (88%) and 7 of 14 (50%) tumors, respectively. Fluorescence in situ hybridization or targeted RNA sequencing confirmed ZC3H7B–BCOR fusion in all tumors, including four and two previously diagnosed as myxoid leiomyosarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma, respectively. Limited clinical data suggest that patients present at higher stage and have worse prognosis compared with published outcomes in low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. Tumors with ZC3H7B–BCOR fusion constitute a distinct group of endometrial stromal sarcomas with high-grade morphology that should be distinguished from other uterine mesenchymal neoplasms that may demonstrate myxoid morphology.

High-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HGESS) may harbor YWHAE-NUTM2A/B fusion, ZC3H7B-BCOR fusion, and BCOR internal tandem duplication (ITD). NTRK3 upregulation and pan-Trk expression were reported in soft tissue lesions that share similar morphology and genetic abnormalities. To confirm these findings in HGESS, differential expression analysis was performed at gene level comparing 11 HGESS with 48 other uterine sarcomas, including 9 low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, 23 undifferentiated uterine sarcomas, and 16 leiomyosarcomas, using targeted RNA sequencing data. Pan-Trk immunohistochemistry was performed on 35 HGESS, including 10 tumors with RNA expression data, with genotypes previously confirmed by targeted RNA sequencing, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and/or genomic PCR. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the top 25% of differentially expressed probes identified three molecular groups: (1) high NTRK3, FGFR3, RET, BCOR, GLI1, and PTCH1 and low ESR1 expression; (2) low NTRK3, FGFR3, RET, BCOR, GLI1, and PTCH1 and high ESR1 expression; and (3) low NTRK3, FGFR3, RET, BCOR, GLI1, PTCH1, and ESR1 expression. Among HGESS, 64% of tumors clustered in group 1, while 27% clustered in group 2. Cytoplasmic and/or nuclear pan-Trk staining of variable extent and intensity was seen in 91% of HGESS regardless of cyclin D1 and/or BCOR positivity. ER and PR expression was seen in 44% of HGESS despite ESR1 downregulation. Two patients with ER and PR positive but ESR1 downregulated stage I HGESS were treated with endocrine therapy, and both recurred at 12 and 36 months after primary resection. By RNA expression, HGESS appear homogenous and distinct from other uterine sarcomas by activation of kinases, including NTRK3, and sonic hedgehog pathway genes along with downregulation of ESR1. Most HGESS demonstrate pan-Trk staining which may serve as a diagnostic biomarker. ESR1 downregulation is seen in some HGESS that express ER and PR which raises implications in the utility of endocrine therapy in these patients.

Recognition of high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma is important because of its aggressive clinical behavior. Morphologic features of YWHAE-NUTM2 high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma may overlap with other uterine sarcoma types. BCOR immunoexpression was studied in these tumors and their morphologic mimics to assess its diagnostic utility. BCOR immunohistochemical staining was performed on archival tissue from 28 high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas with classic morphology (20 YWHAE-NUTM2 , 5 ZC3H7B-BCOR , 3 BCOR-ZC3H7B) , 3 high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas with unusual morphology and unknown gene rearrangement status, 66 low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, 21 endometrial stromal nodules, 38 uterine leiomyosarcomas, and 19 uterine leiomyomas. Intensity of nuclear staining and percentage of positive tumor cells were recorded. Strong diffuse nuclear BCOR staining (defined as >95% of tumor cells) was seen in the round cell component of all 20 (100%) classic YWHAE-NUTM2 high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas and the 3 unusual high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas which prompted FISH studies confirming YWHAE rearrangement in 2 tumors. Genomic PCR confirmed the presence of BCOR exon 16 internal tandem duplication in the third case. Diffuse BCOR staining was strong in three and weak in one BCOR -rearranged high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma while absent in the remaining four BCOR -rearranged tumors. BCOR staining was weakly positive in <5% of tumor cells in 4 of 66 (6%) low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas and 1 of 18 (6%) endometrial stromal nodules and weakly to moderately positive in <5–40% of tumor cells in 6 of 31 (19%) leiomyosarcomas. No BCOR staining was seen in the remaining low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, endometrial stromal nodules, leiomyosarcomas, or any of the leiomyomas. BCOR immunohistochemical staining is a highly sensitive marker for YWHAE-NUTM2 high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with both classic and unusual morphology and identifies a subset of high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with BCOR alterations, including BCOR rearrangement and internal tandem duplication.

Androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor therapy is a developing treatment for AR-positive breast cancer (BC) with ongoing clinical trials. AR splice variant-7 (AR-V7) is a truncated variant of AR that leads to AR inhibitor therapy resistance in prostate cancer; recent studies have identified AR-V7 in BC and theorized that AR-V7 can have a similar impact. This study assessed the prevalence and clinicopathologic features associated with AR-V7 in a large BC cohort. BC samples were evaluated by MSK-Fusion targeted RNAseq for AR-V7 detection and MSK-IMPACT targeted DNAseq, including triple-negative tumors with no driver alteration and estrogen receptor-positive/ ESR1 wildtype tumors progressing on therapy. Among 196 primary and metastatic/recurrent cases (196 RNAseq, 194DNAseq), 9.7% (19/196) were AR-V7 positive and 90.3% (177/196) AR-V7 negative. All AR-V7 positive BC were AR-positive by immunohistochemistry (19/19). The prevalence of AR-V7 by receptor subtype ( N  = 189) was: 18% (12/67) in ER-/PgR-/HER2-negative BC, 3.7% (4/109) in ER-positive/HER2-negative BC, and 15.4% (2/13) in HER2-positive BC; AR-V7 was detected in one ER-positive/HER2-unknown BC. Apocrine morphology was observed in 42.1% (8/19) of AR-V7 positive BC and 3.4% (6/177) AR-V7 negative BC ( P  < 0.00001). Notably, AR-V7 was detected in 2 primary BC and 7 metastatic/recurrent BC patients with no prior endocrine therapy. We conclude that positive AR IHC and apocrine morphology are pathologic features that may indicate testing for AR-V7 is warranted in both primary and metastatic BC in the appropriate clinical context. The study findings further encourage the assessment of AR-V7 as a predictive biomarker for AR antagonist benefit in ongoing clinical BC trials.