Explore the vast range of titles available.

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis with abnormal blood cell development (dysplasia) leading to cytopenias and an increased risk for progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients with MDS can generally be classified as lower- (LR-MDS) or higher-risk (HR-MDS). As treatment goals for patients with LR-MDS and those with HR-MDS differ significantly, appropriate diagnosis, classification, and follow-up are critical for correct disease management. In this review, we focus on the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment options, as well as the prediction of the disease course and monitoring of treatment response in patients with LR-MDS. We discuss how next-generation sequencing, increasing knowledge on mechanisms of MDS pathogenesis, and novel therapies may change the current treatment landscape in LR-MDS and why structured assessments of responses, toxicities, and patient-reported outcomes should be incorporated into routine clinical practice.

Asparaginase (ASP)-containing regimens for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE). We evaluated the prevalence, risk factors, role of prophylaxis and clinical impact of VTE among adolescents and young adult (AYA) patients (15–50 years) treated on Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) ALL protocols. The 1- and 2-year cumulative incidence of VTE were 31.9% (95% CI: 27.0%, 36.9%) and 33.5% (95% CI: 28.5%, 38.5%) respectively, with most events occurring during ASP-based consolidation phase (68.6%). VTE was more frequent in patients with overweight/obese vs. normal BMI (39.2% vs. 29.0%, p  = 0.048). In a 1-year landmark analysis, the 4-year overall survival was 91.5%, without difference between patients with vs. without VTE (93.8% vs. 90.0%, p  = 0.93). Relapse and non-relapse mortality rates were also similar. Among patients treated at Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, cerebral sinus vein thrombosis occurred in 3.6% of patients (8.5% of VTE events) in comparison to pulmonary embolism (32.9%) and deep vein thromboses (58.6%, 24.4% line-associated). In a Cox regression model for VTE free-time, elevated BMI was associated with shorter VTE free-time (HR 1.94 [95% CI 1.13-3.35], p  = 0.018), while low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) prophylaxis as time-varying covariate was not. In conclusion, we found that VTE was frequent in AYAs treated on DFCI ALL protocols but did not impact survival outcomes. Overweight/obese BMI increased risk for VTE.

Myriad infectious and noninfectious causes of encephalomyelitis (EM) have similar clinical manifestations, presenting serious challenges to diagnosis and treatment. Metabolomics of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was explored as a method of differentiating among neurological diseases causing EM using a single CSF sample. 1H NMR metabolomics was applied to CSF samples from 27 patients with a laboratory-confirmed disease, including Lyme disease or West Nile Virus meningoencephalitis, multiple sclerosis, rabies, or Histoplasma meningitis, and 25 controls. Cluster analyses distinguished samples by infection status and moderately by pathogen, with shared and differentiating metabolite patterns observed among diseases. CART analysis predicted infection status with 100% sensitivity and 93% specificity. These preliminary results suggest the potential utility of CSF metabolomics as a rapid screening test to enhance diagnostic accuracies and improve patient outcomes.

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) treated with DNMTI therapy have responses according to the 2006 IWG response criteria. CR responses have had the strongest association with OS. Recently, CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh; i.e. blasts <5%, ANC > 500, platelets > 50) has been evaluated in AML, but its relevance is unknown in MDS. We identified adult patients with MDS treated with DNMTIs. We assessed best overall response to therapy according to IWG 2006 criteria, and subsequently identified patients meeting CRh criteria from the subgroup with SD or mCR. We evaluated duration of therapy and overall survival according to response. We identified 311 patients with MDS who received treatment between 2007 and 2018. The median age at the time of therapy was 69 years (range 23–91). Median follow up was 60 months. According to IWG 2006, responses included CR (n = 43, 14%), PR (n = 2, 1%), mCR (n = 57, 18%), SD (n = 149, 48%) and PD (n = 60, 19%). 79 patients (25%) achieved HI. A total of 62 patients (20%) met CRh criteria leading to reclassification of mCR (now n = 26, 8%) or SD (now n = 118, 38%). Patients achieving CR had similar time on therapy (median 8.1mo) compared to CRh (median 6mo, HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.9–2.0), and longer than other responses (p < 0.001). OS varied according to response; median OS was similar between CR (23.3mo) and CRh (25mo, HR 1.28 [0.79–2.08]), which was longer than those with mCR (17.2mo, HR 1.71 [0.96–3.05]), SD (16.3mo, HR 1.61 [1.04–2.48]), and PD (8.7mo, HR 3.04 [1.91–4.83]) (p < 0.001). OS associations with CR/CRh were confirmed in multivariable analysis accounting for allogeneic transplant. MDS patients who achieve a CRh response had similar survival and duration on therapy as patients who achieve CR response and superior to other IWG responses. These data support further evaluation of CRh into future response criteria and clinical trials.Following treatment with DNMTI therapy, patients with MDS have differences in survival according to the quality of their treatment response. In this analysis, patients who achieve CRh had similar OS compared to those meeting standard “CR” criteria, which was better than the survival of those with other treatment responses (p < 0.0001).

Background: GSK3326595 is a potent, selective, reversible protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) inhibitor under investigation for treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In preclinical models of AML, PRMT5 inhibition decreased proliferation and increased cell death, supporting additional clinical research in myeloid neoplasms. Objectives: To determine the clinical activity, safety, tolerability, dosing, additional measures of clinical activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of GSK3326595. Design: In part 1 of this open-label, multicenter, multipart, phase I/II study, adults with relapsed/refractory myeloid neoplasms (e.g., MDS, CMML, and AML) received monotherapy with 400 or 300 mg oral GSK3326595 once daily. Study termination occurred prior to part 2 enrollment. Methods: Clinical activity was determined by the clinical benefit rate (CBR; proportion of patients achieving complete remission (CR), complete marrow remission (mCR), partial remission, stable disease (SD) >8 weeks, or hematologic improvement). Adverse events (AEs) were assessed by incidence and severity. Exploratory examination of spliceosome mutations was performed to determine the relationship between genomic profiles and clinical response to GSK3326595. Results: Thirty patients with a median age of 73.5 years (range, 47–90) were enrolled; 13 (43%) and 17 (57%) received 400 and 300 mg of GSK3326595, respectively. Five (17%) patients met CBR criteria: 4 (13%) with SD >8 weeks and 1 (3%) achieving mCR. Of five patients with clinical benefit: three had SRSF2 mutation, one U2AF1, and one was splicing factor wild-type. Frequent GSK3326595-related AEs were decreased platelet count (27%), dysgeusia (23%), fatigue (20%), and nausea (20%). GSK3326595 had rapid absorption, with a Tmax of approximately 2 h and a terminal half-life of 4–6 h. Conclusion: GSK3326595 monotherapy had limited clinical activity in heavily pretreated patients despite robust target engagement. The safety profile was broadly consistent with other published PRMT5 inhibitor studies. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03614728. Plain language summary A clinical study to determine the effectiveness and safety of a medication called GSK3326595 in patients with cancers that affect the blood and bone marrow What is this study about? This summary provides the results of a study performed to see how safe and effective treatment with a once daily, oral medication called GSK3326595 was in patients with blood and bone marrow cancers. What are PRMT5 inhibitors? GSK3326595 belongs to a class of medications known as PRMT5 inhibitors. PRMT5 is an enzyme that is involved in many processes in cells. In cancers, too much PRMT5 activity can cause excessive cell growth. This study was performed to see if blocking of PRMT5 by GSK3326595 would help treat patients with blood and bone marrow cancers. What patients were in this study? The patients included in this study had previously received many other cancer treatments. Most patients with these types of cancers have few treatment options and usually pass away due to their disease. What were the results? Five of the 30 patients (17%) included in the study had a response to treatment, including 4 patients with stable disease for more than 8 weeks and 1 patient with complete marrow remission for approximately 8 months. Of the 93% of patients that completed the study, 83% died. Ultimately, all 30 patients discontinued study treatment, mostly due to progression of their disease. The most frequent side effects related to GSK3326595 treatment that occurred in ⩾20% of patients were a decrease in the number of cells that help the blood clot, change in taste bud sense, fatigue, and nausea. The side effects caused by GSK3326595 were similar to what is seen with other PRMT5 inhibitors. Treatment with GSK3326595 provided limited benefits in this patient population and no future studies are planned for GSK3326595 at this time. Additional studies are needed for PRMT5 inhibitors, including combination therapies, to determine which patients with blood and bone marrow cancers could potentially benefit from treatment.

Background/Objectives: The main objective of the study is to assess the clinical utility of microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) in neutropenic patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing chemotherapy in the outpatient setting. Neutropenia is a common complication in this patient cohort and enhances the risk of fatal opportunistic bacterial and fungal infections. Accurate and timely diagnosis of these infections in outpatient asymptomatic individuals is critical. Methods: Fourteen patients were studied in this prospective observational case series. Traditional blood cultures (BCs) were obtained when clinically indicated and blood samples were collected for plasma mcfDNA metagenomic sequencing up to two times a week at outpatient oncology appointments. Results were compared in identifying potential infectious agents. Results: BCs identified pathogens in only two patients, despite several cases where infection was suspected. In contrast, mcfDNA testing detected pathogens in 11 of the 14 patients, including bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus, and invasive fungi, such as Candida and Aspergillus species, and Pneumocystis jirovecii. Conclusions: In the outpatient setting, mcfDNA surveillance offers a more reliable method for detecting pathogens. This approach identified actionable microbiologic results in immunocompromised individuals who did not meet standard clinical criteria for suspicion of infection. Further research is required to confirm the potential of mcfDNA surveillance in an outpatient setting to guide more accurate treatment decisions, reduce extensive clinical investigations, and improve neutropenic patient outcomes.

Adolescents and young adult (AYA) patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) face worse outcomes than children. While pediatric-inspired protocols have improved outcomes, the ability of patients to complete these intensive regimens and the reasons for discontinuation are unknown. We analyzed a cohort of 332 AYA patients (aged 15–49 years) and 1159 children (aged 1–14 years) with Ph-negative ALL treated on DFCI consortium protocols. We found that AYA patients completed treatment at lower rates than children (60.8% vs. 89.7%, p  < 0.001), primarily due to higher rates of early treatment failure (14.5% vs. 2.4%, p  < 0.001). Withdrawal from treatment for toxicity, social/personal, or unknown reasons was uncommon, but higher among AYA patients (9.3% vs 4.7%, p  = 0.001). Patients who remained on assigned therapy for one year had favorable overall survival (AYA 5-year OS 88.9%; children 5-year OS 96.4%; p  < 0.001). Among patients who continued treatment for 1 year, AYA patients completed asparaginase (defined as receiving 26+ weeks) at lower rates than children (79.1% vs. 89.6%, p  < 0.001). Patients who received more weeks of consolidation asparaginase had higher overall and event-free survival. Efforts should focus on identifying patients at risk for early treatment failure and optimizing asparaginase delivery.

A 49-year-old man was evaluated because of relapsed acute myeloid leukemia that occurred 14 months after the initial diagnosis and treatment. Molecular genetic profiling at the time of relapse identified a new internal tandem duplication mutation in FLT3 ( FLT3 -ITD). A bone marrow biopsy was performed, and management decisions were made.

A Children's Oncology Group study of nearly 1,000 pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases reveals marked differences between the genomic landscapes of pediatric and adult AML and offers directions for future work.

We conducted a single‐center, open‐label, dose escalation, and expansion phase I trial of the antiangiogenic multikinase inhibitor regorafenib in patients with advanced myeloid neoplasms. We enrolled 16 patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). A 3 + 3 dose escalation design was used with two planned dose levels (120 or 160 mg daily) and one de‐escalation level (80 mg daily). An additional 10 patients were treated on an expansion cohort. The recommended phase two dose of regorafenib was 160 mg daily, with no dose‐limiting toxicities. The best overall disease response by International Working Group criteria included one partial and stable disease in 11 patients. Tissue studies indicated no change in Ras/mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway activation in responders. Pharmacodynamic changes in plasma VEGF, PlGF, and sVEGFR2 were detected during treatment. Baseline proinflammatory and angiogenic cytokine levels were not associated with clinical response. Single‐agent regorafenib demonstrated an acceptable safety profile in relapsed/refractory myeloid malignancy patients. Most patients achieved stable disease, with modest improvements in cell counts in some MDS patients. Biomarker studies were consistent with on‐target effects of regorafenib on angiogenesis. Future studies should investigate the role of regorafenib in combination therapy approaches.