Explore the vast range of titles available.

Resources are increasingly spent on artificial intelligence (AI) solutions for medical applications aiming to improve diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of diseases. While the need for transparency and reduction of bias in data and algorithm development has been addressed in past studies, little is known about the knowledge and perception of bias among AI developers. This study's objective was to survey AI specialists in health care to investigate developers' perceptions of bias in AI algorithms for health care applications and their awareness and use of preventative measures. A web-based survey was provided in both German and English language, comprising a maximum of 41 questions using branching logic within the REDCap web application. Only the results of participants with experience in the field of medical AI applications and complete questionnaires were included for analysis. Demographic data, technical expertise, and perceptions of fairness, as well as knowledge of biases in AI, were analyzed, and variations among gender, age, and work environment were assessed. A total of 151 AI specialists completed the web-based survey. The median age was 30 (IQR 26-39) years, and 67% (101/151) of respondents were male. One-third rated their AI development projects as fair (47/151, 31%) or moderately fair (51/151, 34%), 12% (18/151) reported their AI to be barely fair, and 1% (2/151) not fair at all. One participant identifying as diverse rated AI developments as barely fair, and among the 2 undefined gender participants, AI developments were rated as barely fair or moderately fair, respectively. Reasons for biases selected by respondents were lack of fair data (90/132, 68%), guidelines or recommendations (65/132, 49%), or knowledge (60/132, 45%). Half of the respondents worked with image data (83/151, 55%) from 1 center only (76/151, 50%), and 35% (53/151) worked with national data exclusively. This study shows that the perception of biases in AI overall is moderately fair. Gender minorities did not once rate their AI development as fair or very fair. Therefore, further studies need to focus on minorities and women and their perceptions of AI. The results highlight the need to strengthen knowledge about bias in AI and provide guidelines on preventing biases in AI health care applications.

It is necessary to harmonize and standardize data variables used in case report forms (CRFs) of clinical studies to facilitate the merging and sharing of the collected patient data across several clinical studies. This is particularly true for clinical studies that focus on infectious diseases. Public health may be highly dependent on the findings of such studies. Hence, there is an elevated urgency to generate meaningful, reliable insights, ideally based on a high sample number and quality data. The implementation of core data elements and the incorporation of interoperability standards can facilitate the creation of harmonized clinical data sets. This study's objective was to compare, harmonize, and standardize variables focused on diagnostic tests used as part of CRFs in 6 international clinical studies of infectious diseases in order to, ultimately, then make available the panstudy common data elements (CDEs) for ongoing and future studies to foster interoperability and comparability of collected data across trials. We reviewed and compared the metadata that comprised the CRFs used for data collection in and across all 6 infectious disease studies under consideration in order to identify CDEs. We examined the availability of international semantic standard codes within the Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms, the National Cancer Institute Thesaurus, and the Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes system for the unambiguous representation of diagnostic testing information that makes up the CDEs. We then proposed 2 data models that incorporate semantic and syntactic standards for the identified CDEs. Of 216 variables that were considered in the scope of the analysis, we identified 11 CDEs to describe diagnostic tests (in particular, serology and sequencing) for infectious diseases: viral lineage/clade; test date, type, performer, and manufacturer; target gene; quantitative and qualitative results; and specimen identifier, type, and collection date. The identification of CDEs for infectious diseases is the first step in facilitating the exchange and possible merging of a subset of data across clinical studies (and with that, large research projects) for possible shared analysis to increase the power of findings. The path to harmonization and standardization of clinical study data in the interest of interoperability can be paved in 2 ways. First, a map to standard terminologies ensures that each data element's (variable's) definition is unambiguous and that it has a single, unique interpretation across studies. Second, the exchange of these data is assisted by \"wrapping\" them in a standard exchange format, such as Fast Health care Interoperability Resources or the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium's Clinical Data Acquisition Standards Harmonization Model.

The European project ORCHESTRA intends to create a new pan-European cohort to rapidly advance the knowledge of the effects and treatment of COVID-19. Establishing processes that facilitate the merging of heterogeneous clusters of retrospective data was an essential challenge. In addition, data from new ORCHESTRA prospective studies have to be compatible with earlier collected information to be efficiently combined. In this article, we describe how we utilized and contributed to existing standard terminologies to create consistent semantic representation of over 2500 COVID-19-related variables taken from three ORCHESTRA studies. The goal is to enable the semantic interoperability of data within the existing project studies and to create a common basis of standardized elements available for the design of new COVID-19 studies. We also identified 743 variables that were commonly used in two of the three prospective ORCHESTRA studies and can therefore be directly combined for analysis purposes. Additionally, we actively contributed to global interoperability by submitting new concept requests to the terminology Standards Development Organizations.

The German National Strategy for Genomic Medicine (genomDE) aims to integrate genome sequencing into standard healthcare. However, integrating genomics data from research and healthcare remains challenging. This study analyzed how the genomDE dataset could be mapped to international standards: the Genomics Reporting Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources® (FHIR®) Implementation Guide (IG) 2.0.0, the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH)’s Phenopacket Schema, and the German national molecular genomics report IG of the Medical Informatics Initiative (MII). Sample FHIR® bundles and necessary search queries were created and validated. Most dataset elements could be represented using existing FHIR profiles, while unmapped elements were addressed through profiling and extensions. The study highlights that the genomDE dataset can largely be mapped to existing international standards, with the potential to extend these standards to accommodate missing elements, thereby improving genomic data interoperability in healthcare.

ORCHESTRA (“Connecting European Cohorts to Increase Common and Effective Response To SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic”) is an EU-funded project which aims to help rapidly advance the knowledge related to the prevention of the SARS-CoV-2 infection and the management of COVID-19 and its long-term sequelae. Here, we describe the early results of this project, focusing on the strengths of multiple, international, historical and prospective cohort studies and highlighting those results which are of potential relevance for vaccination strategies, such as the necessity of a vaccine booster dose after a primary vaccination course in hematologic cancer patients and in solid organ transplant recipients to elicit a higher antibody titer, and the protective effect of vaccination on severe COVID-19 clinical manifestation and on the emergence of post-COVID-19 conditions. Valuable data regarding epidemiological variations, risk factors of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its sequelae, and vaccination efficacy in different subpopulations can support further defining public health vaccination policies.

Glycosaminoglycans are long polysaccharidic chains, which are mostly present in connective tissues. Modified GAG expression in tissues surrounding malignant cells has been shown to contribute to tumor progression, aggressive status and metastasis in many types of cancer. Ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal gynecological malignancies due to its late diagnosis because of the absence of clear symptoms and unavailability of early disease markers. We investigated for the first time GAG changes at the molecular level as a novel biomarker for primary epithelial ovarian cancer. To this end, serum of a cohort of 68 samples was digested with chondroitinase ABC, which releases chondroitin sulfate into disaccharides. After labeling and purification, they were measured by HPLC, yielding a profile of eight disaccharides. We proposed a novel GAG-based score named “CS- bio” from the measured abundance of disaccharides present that were of statistical relevance. CS-bio’s performance was compared with CA125, the clinically used serum tumor marker in routine diagnostics. CS-bio had a better sensitivity and specificity than CA125. It was more apt in differentiating early-stage patients from healthy controls, which is of high interest for oncologists.

Background The ORCHESTRA project, funded by the European Commission, aims to create a pan-European cohort built on existing and new large-scale population cohorts to help rapidly advance the knowledge related to the prevention of the SARS-CoV-2 infection and the management of COVID-19 and its long-term sequelae. The integration and analysis of the very heterogeneous health data pose the challenge of building an innovative technological infrastructure as the foundation of a dedicated framework for data management that should address the regulatory requirements such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Methods The three participating Supercomputing European Centres (CINECA - Italy, CINES - France and HLRS - Germany) designed and deployed a dedicated infrastructure to fulfil the functional requirements for data management to ensure sensitive biomedical data confidentiality/privacy, integrity, and security. Besides the technological issues, many methodological aspects have been considered: Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Charité provided its expertise both for data protection, information security, and data harmonisation/standardisation. Results The resulting infrastructure is based on a multi-layer approach that integrates several security measures to ensure data protection. A centralised Data Collection Platform has been established in the Italian National Hub while, for the use cases in which data sharing is not possible due to privacy restrictions, a distributed approach for Federated Analysis has been considered. A Data Portal is available as a centralised point of access for non-sensitive data and results, according to findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability (FAIR) data principles. This technological infrastructure has been used to support significative data exchange between population cohorts and to publish important scientific results related to SARS-CoV-2. Conclusions Considering the increasing demand for data usage in accordance with the requirements of the GDPR regulations, the experience gained in the project and the infrastructure released for the ORCHESTRA project can act as a model to manage future public health threats. Other projects could benefit from the results achieved by ORCHESTRA by building upon the available standardisation of variables, design of the architecture, and process used for GDPR compliance.

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to tremendous investment in clinical studies to generate much-needed knowledge on the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and long-term effects of the disease. Case report forms, comprised of questions and answers (variables), are commonly used to collect data in clinical trials. Maximizing the value of study data depends on data quality and on the ability to easily pool and share data from several sources. ISARIC, in collaboration with the WHO, has created a case report form that is available for use by the scientific community to collect COVID-19 trial data. One of such research initiatives collecting and analyzing multi-country and multi-cohort COVID-19 study data is the Horizon 2020 project ORCHESTRA. Following the ISO/TS 21564:2019 standard, a mapping between five ORCHESTRA studies’ variables and the ISARIC Freestanding Follow-Up Survey elements was created. Measures of correspondence of shared semantic domain of 0 (perfect match), 1 (fully inclusive match), 2 (partial match), 4 (transformation required) or 4* (not present in ORCHESTRA) as compared to the target code system, ORCHESTRA study variables, were assigned to each of the elements in the ISARIC FUP case report form (CRF) which was considered the source code system. Of the ISARIC FUP CRF’s variables, around 34% were found to show an exact match with corresponding variables in ORCHESTRA studies and about 33% showed a non-inclusive overlap. Matching variables provided information on patient demographics, COVID-19 testing, hospital admission and symptoms. More in-depth details are covered in ORCHESTRA variables with regards to treatment and comorbidities. ORCHESTRA’s Long-Term Sequelae and Fragile population studies’ CRFs include 32 and 27 variables respectively which were evaluated as a perfect match to variables in the ISARIC FUP CRF. Our study serves as an example of the kind of maps between case report form variables from different research projects needed to link ongoing COVID-19 research efforts and facilitate collaboration and data sharing. To enable data aggregation across two data systems, the information they contain needs to be connected through a map to determine compatibility and transformation needs. Combining data from various clinical studies can increase the power of analytical insights.