Explore the vast range of titles available.

In this study, fractional flow reserve was used to identify patients with high-risk coronary stenoses, who received either PCI or medical therapy alone; patients with lower-risk lesions were entered in a registry. The PCI group had better outcomes than the medical-therapy group. The benefit of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as an initial treatment strategy in patients with stable coronary artery disease remains controversial. 1 – 3 The potential result from revascularization depends on the extent and the degree of myocardial ischemia. 4 , 5 A fractional flow reserve (FFR) value of 0.80 or less (i.e., a drop in maximal blood flow of 20% or more caused by stenosis), as measured with the use of a coronary pressure wire during catheterization, indicates the potential of a stenosis to induce myocardial ischemia. 6 – 8 In such cases, robust clinical-outcome data favor FFR-guided revascularization, as compared with revascularization guided by . . .

BackgroundThe objective of the study was to identify any changes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in England by analysing procedural numbers, clinical characteristics and patient outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent PCI in England between January 2017 and April 2020 in the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society-National Institute of Cardiovascular Outcomes Research database. Analysis was restricted to 44 hospitals that reported contemporaneous activity on PCI. Only patients with primary PCI for STEMI were included in the analysis.ResultsA total of 34 127 patients with STEMI (primary PCI 33 938, facilitated PCI 108, rescue PCI 81) were included in the study. There was a decline in the number of procedures by 43% (n=497) in April 2020 compared with the average monthly procedures between 2017 and 2019 (n=865). For all patients, the median time from symptom to hospital showed increased after the lockdown (150 (99–270) vs 135 (89–250) min, p=0.004) and a longer door-to-balloon time after the lockdown (48 (21–112) vs 37 (16–94) min, p<0.001). The in-hospital mortality rate was 4.8% before the lockdown and 3.5% after the lockdown (p=0.12). Following adjustment for baseline characteristics, no differences were observed for in-hospital death (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.68, p=0.67) and major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.32, p=0.28).ConclusionsFollowing the lockdown in England, we observed a decline in primary PCI procedures for STEMI and increases in overall symptom-to-hospital and door-to-balloon time for patients with STEMI. Restructuring health services during COVID-19 has not adversely influenced in-hospital outcomes.

In this trial, fractional flow reserve was used to assess the functional significance of coronary stenoses in patients with clinically stable coronary artery disease. The clinical outcomes were better when this technique was used to direct the use of coronary stenting. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves the outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes. 1 In contrast, for the treatment of patients with stable coronary artery disease, controversy persists regarding the extent of the benefit from PCI, as compared with the best available medical therapy, as an initial management strategy. 2 – 5 The potential benefit of revascularization depends on the presence and extent of myocardial ischemia. 6 – 8 Performing PCI on nonischemic stenoses is not beneficial 9 and is probably harmful. 10 Thus, careful selection of ischemia-inducing stenoses is essential for deriving the greatest benefit from revascularization in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Fractional flow . . .

Anemia is common in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and current guidelines fail to offer recommendations for its management. This review aims to examine the relation between baseline anemia and mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and major bleeding in patients undergoing PCI. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies that evaluated mortality and adverse outcomes in anemic and nonanemic patients who underwent PCI. Data were collected on study design, participant characteristics, definition of anemia, follow-up, and adverse outcomes. Random effects meta-analysis of risk ratios was performed using inverse variance method. A total of 44 studies were included in the review with 230,795 participants. The prevalence of baseline anemia was 26,514 of 170,914 (16%). There was an elevated risk of mortality and MACE with anemia compared with no anemia-pooled risk ratio (RR) 2.39 (2.02 to 2.83), p <0.001 and RR 1.51 (1.34 to 1.71), p <0.001, respectively. The risk of myocardial infarction and bleeding with anemia compared with no anemia was elevated, pooled RR 1.33 (1.07 to 1.65), p = 0.01 and RR 1.97 (1.03 to 3.77), p <0.001, respectively. The risk of mortality per unit incremental decrease in hemoglobin (g/dl) was RR 1.19 (1.09 to 1.30), p <0.001 and the risk of mortality, MACE, and reinfarction per 1 unit incremental decrease in hematocrit (%) was RR 1.07 (1.05 to 1.10), p = 0.04, RR 1.09 (1.08 to 1.10) and RR 1.06 (1.03 to 1.10), respectively. The prevalence of anemia in contemporary cohorts of patients undergoing PCI is significant and is associated with significant increases in postprocedural mortality, MACE, reinfarction, and bleeding. The optimal strategy for the management of anemia in such patients remains uncertain.

The use of coronary physiology in patients with chronic coronary syndromes is highly variable, and the evidence base complex. Tests of coronary physiology have traditionally been invasive (e.g., fractional flow reserve), but novel non-invasive methods are now available which provide additional anatomical information (e.g., computed tomography-based fractional flow reserve and angiogram-derived physiology). This review summarises the evidence for and against the relative value of these tests for patients being investigated for chest pain that may represent chronic coronary syndromes, and for those triaged to percutaneous coronary intervention.

Complex high-risk and indicated revascularization using percutaneous coronary intervention (CHIP-PCI) is an emerging concept that is poorly studied. To define temporal changes in CHIP-PCI volumes, and the relationship between operator CHIP-PCI volume and patient outcomes. Data were analyzed on all CHIP-PCI procedures undertaken for stable angina in England and Wales between 2007 and 2014. Operator volume data was available for 2012-14. CHIP-PCI was defined by patient characteristics (age ≥80years, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction <30%, previous CABG, or chronic renal failure) and/or by procedural characteristics (left main PCI, chronic total occlusion PCI, LV support, use of rotational atherectomy or laser atherectomy). CHIP-PCI as a percentage of total PCI increased from 28.1% in 2007 to 36.2% in 2014 (P < .001). Between 2012 and 2014, a total of 30,268 CHIP-PCI cases were performed. Total operator volume varied from 1 to 580 cases with median total operator volume of 29 cases. Higher operator volumes were associated with a greater degree of patient comorbidity and increasing procedural complexity. After adjustment for baseline difference, in-hospital major bleeding (P < .001 for trend), access site complications (P < .001) and coronary perforation (P = .002) were associated with increasing operator CHIP-PCI volumes. However, the frequency of in-hospital death (P = .394) and 12-month mortality (P = .638) were similar across the volume quartiles. Higher volumes quartiles were associated with a greater likelihood of same day discharge (P < .001). CHIP-PCI cases are an increasingly large population in contemporary PCI practice. Higher operator volumes were not associated with improved 12-month survival. Data were analyzed on all complex high-risk and indicated revascularization using percutaneous coronary intervention (CHIP-PCI) procedures in England and Wales between 2007 and 2014. CHIP-PCI as a percentage of total PCI increased from 28.1% in 2007 to 36.2% in 2014 (P < .001). Median total operator volume was 29 cases with higher volumes associated with more patient comorbidity and increasing procedural complexity. In-hospital major bleeding (P < .001 for trend), access site complications (P < .001) and coronary perforation (P = .002) all associated with increasing operator CHIP-PCI volumes. However, trends for in-hospital death (P = .394), and 12-month mortality (P = .638) were similar across the volume quartiles.

ObjectiveThere are concerns that healthcare and outcomes of black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) communities are disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. We investigated admission rates, treatment and mortality of BAME with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during COVID-19.MethodsUsing multisource national healthcare records, patients hospitalised with AMI in England during 1 February–27 May 2020 were included in the COVID-19 group, whereas patients admitted during the same period in the previous three consecutive years were included in a pre-COVID-19 group. Multilevel hierarchical regression analyses were used to quantify the changes in-hospital and 7-day mortality in BAME compared with whites.ResultsOf 73 746 patients, higher proportions of BAME patients (16.7% vs 10.1%) were hospitalised with AMI during the COVID-19 period compared with pre-COVID-19. BAME patients admitted during the COVID-19 period were younger, male and likely to present with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. COVID-19 BAME group admitted with non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction less frequently received coronary angiography (86.1% vs 90.0%, p<0.001) and had a longer median delay to reperfusion (4.1 hours vs 3.7 hours, p<0.001) compared with whites. BAME had higher in-hospital (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.28) and 7-day mortality (OR 1.81 95% CI 1.31 to 2.19) during COVID-19 compared with pre-COVID-19 period.ConclusionIn this multisource linked cohort study, compared with whites, BAME patients had proportionally higher hospitalisation rates with AMI, less frequently received guidelines indicated care and had higher early mortality during COVID-19 period compared with pre-COVID-19 period. There is a need to develop clinical pathways to achieve equity in the management of these vulnerable populations.

IntroductionThe PRECISE study demonstrated that the Prospective multicentre imaging study for evaluation of chest pain (PROMISE) Minimal risk score (PMRS) can identify patients with recent onset stable chest pain who could safely be reassured and discharged without further testing. Despite this observation, the PMRS is not in widespread use. The aim of this analysis was therefore to retrospectively evaluate the performance of the PMRS had it been applied as a decision tool in a real-world population.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort analysis of all stable chest pain referrals from 03 April 2023 to 30 August 2024. All elements of the PMRS were measured, along with key patient outcomes including subsequent investigations and cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction (MI) and all-cause mortality). Statistical analyses were conducted in accordance with the data type and distribution. The cohort was split into the minimal risk cohort (PMRS >0.46) and the remainder of the cohort (PMRS ≤0.46). A Kaplan-Meier curve, with log rank analysis, was created to compare the incidence of death/MI between the minimal risk and the remainder of the cohort.ResultsThis analysis included 3983 patients with a median age of 64 years (IQR 55–75 years) and 49.5% female. The median PMRS was 0.102 (IQR 0.041–0.257) with 10.9% (436) categorised as minimal risk (PMRS >0.46). In the minimal risk group, there were three CT coronary angiographies (0.7%) that demonstrated obstructive coronary disease. At a median follow-up of 306 days (IQR 177–428) there were no MI or deaths recorded in the minimal risk group.ConclusionThese data demonstrate that a PMRS >0.46 is associated with a very low frequency of significant coronary artery disease and MI or death. This proof of concept suggests that PMRS could be safely instituted into clinical practice to defer those patients at minimal risk from further investigations which would result in significant resource savings for healthcare services.

ObjectiveTo estimate the population prevalence and treatable burden of severe aortic stenosis (AS) in the UK.MethodsWe adapted a contemporary model of the population profile of symptomatic and asymptomatic severe AS in Europe and North America to estimate the number of people aged ≥55 years in the UK who might benefit from surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).ResultsWith a point prevalence of 1.48%, we estimate that 291 448 men and women aged ≥55 years in the UK had severe AS in 2019. Of these, 68.3% (199 059, 95% CI 1 77 201 to 221 355 people) would have been symptomatic and, therefore, more readily treated according to their surgical risk profile; the remaining 31.7% of cases (92 389, 95% CI 70 093 to 144 247) being asymptomatic. Based on historical patterns of intervention, 58.4% (116 251, 95% CI 106 895 to 1 25 606) of the 199 059 symptomatic cases would qualify for SAVR, with 7208 (95% CI 7091 to 7234) being assessed as being in a high, preoperative surgical risk category. Among the remaining 41.6% (82 809, 95% CI 73 453 to 92 164) of cases potentially unsuitable for SAVR, an estimated 61.7% (51 093, 95% CI 34 780 to 67 655) might be suitable for TAVI. We estimate that 172 859 out of 291 448 prevalent cases of severe AS (59.3%) will subsequently die within 5 years without proactive management.ConclusionsThese data suggest a high burden of severe AS in the UK requiring surgical or transcatheter intervention that challenges the ongoing capacity of the National Health Service to meet the needs of those affected.