Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
61 result(s) for "Edelstein, Benjamin"
Sort by:
Recusal as Remedy: Disincentivizing Donors
As judicial elections become increasingly expensive, recusal has emerged as a way to address concerns about the impartiality of judges who receive contributions from lawyers or potential litigants. While it is unclear if strict recusal rules are the best remedy for conflicts of interest created by contributions, they may disincentivize potential donors from investing in judicial campaigns by negating their potential goal of influencing decisions. We consider whether donor behavior in judicial campaigns – especially for those donors most likely to be interested in specifically currying favor with judges – responds to differences in recusal standards. Using data from 219 state supreme court races in 22 states from 2010 to 2020, we find that states with stricter recusal rules attract fewer campaign donations to judicial races, and states with more lax rules attract more overall and, most especially, for attorney donors.
Von der Schulform zur schulischen Organisationsform. Zur Diffusion eines neuen Paradigmas der Schulstrukturentwicklung
Viele Bundesländer machen für Schulformen mit mehr als einem Bildungsgang nur noch Rahmenvorgaben zur Leistungsdifferenzierung und delegieren deren konkrete Ausgestaltung an die Einzelschule. Damit verliert die viel verwendete Kategorie „Schulform“ zusehends an deskriptivem und analytischem Wert. Der vorliegende Beitrag nimmt diese Entwicklung zum Anlass, die Schulstrukturen der Bundesländer systematisch auf Ebene der schulischen Organisationsformen zu vergleichen und die Implikationen einer um Differenzierungsfragen erweiterten Schulautonomie für die amtliche Schulstatistik und Bildungsforschung zu reflektieren.
Von der Schulform zur schulischen Organisationsform: Zur Diffusion eines neuen Paradigmas der Schulstrukturentwicklung
Viele Bundesländer machen für Schulformen mit mehr als einem Bildungsgang nur noch Rahmenvorgaben zur Leistungsdifferenzierung und delegieren deren konkrete Ausgestaltung an die Einzelschule. Damit verliert die viel verwendete Kategorie \"Schulform\" zusehends an deskriptivem und analytischem Wert. Der vorliegende Beitrag nimmt diese Entwicklung zum Anlass, die Schulstrukturen der Bundesländer systematisch auf Ebene der schulischen Organisationsformen zu vergleichen und die Implikationen einer um Differenzierungsfragen erweiterten Schulautonomie für die amtliche Schulstatistik und Bildungsforschung zu reflektieren. For school types with more than one educational track, many federal states in Germany now provide only a general legal framework concerning performance-based differentiation and delegate its concrete design to the individual school. As a result, the much-used category \"school type\" is losing descriptive and analytical value. The present article takes up this development. It systematically compares the German states' school structures at the level of organizational forms and reflects on the implications that the inclusion of differentiation issues in school autonomy has for official school statistics and educational research.