Explore the vast range of titles available.

Elastic electron–proton scattering (e–p) and the spectroscopy of hydrogen atoms are the two methods traditionally used to determine the proton charge radius, r p . In 2010, a new method using muonic hydrogen atoms 1 found a substantial discrepancy compared with previous results 2 , which became known as the ‘proton radius puzzle’. Despite experimental and theoretical efforts, the puzzle remains unresolved. In fact, there is a discrepancy between the two most recent spectroscopic measurements conducted on ordinary hydrogen 3 , 4 . Here we report on the proton charge radius experiment at Jefferson Laboratory (PRad), a high-precision e–p experiment that was established after the discrepancy was identified. We used a magnetic-spectrometer-free method along with a windowless hydrogen gas target, which overcame several limitations of previous e–p experiments and enabled measurements at very small forward-scattering angles. Our result, r p  = 0.831 ± 0.007 stat  ± 0.012 syst  femtometres, is smaller than the most recent high-precision e–p measurement 5 and 2.7 standard deviations smaller than the average of all e–p experimental results 6 . The smaller r p we have now measured supports the value found by two previous muonic hydrogen experiments 1 , 7 . In addition, our finding agrees with the revised value (announced in 2019) for the Rydberg constant 8 —one of the most accurately evaluated fundamental constants in physics. A magnetic-spectrometer-free method for electron–proton scattering data reveals a proton charge radius 2.7 standard deviations smaller than the currently accepted value from electron–proton scattering, yet consistent with other recent experiments.

Elastic electron–proton scattering (e–p) and the spectroscopy of hydrogen atoms are the two methods traditionally used to determine the proton charge radius, rp. In 2010, a new method using muonic hydrogen atoms found a substantial discrepancy compared with previous results, which became known as the ‘proton radius puzzle’. Despite experimental and theoretical efforts, the puzzle remains unresolved. In fact, there is a discrepancy between the two most recent spectroscopic measurements conducted on ordinary hydrogen. Here we report on the proton charge radius experiment at Jefferson Laboratory (PRad), a high-precision e–p experiment that was established after the discrepancy was identified. We used a magnetic-spectrometer-free method along with a windowless hydrogen gas target, which overcame several limitations of previous e–p experiments and enabled measurements at very small forward-scattering angles. Our result, rp = 0.831 ± 0.007stat ± 0.012syst femtometres, is smaller than the most recent high-precision e–p measurement and 2.7 standard deviations smaller than the average of all e–p experimental results. Here, the smaller rp we have now measured supports the value found by two previous muonic hydrogen experiments. In addition, our finding agrees with the revised value (announced in 2019) for the Rydberg constant—one of the most accurately evaluated fundamental constants in physics.

Elastic electron-proton scattering (e-p) and the spectroscopy of hydrogen atoms are the two methods traditionally used to determine the proton charge radius, r.sub.p. In 2010, a new method using muonic hydrogen atoms.sup.1 found a substantial discrepancy compared with previous results.sup.2, which became known as the 'proton radius puzzle'. Despite experimental and theoretical efforts, the puzzle remains unresolved. In fact, there is a discrepancy between the two most recent spectroscopic measurements conducted on ordinary hydrogen.sup.3,4. Here we report on the proton charge radius experiment at Jefferson Laboratory (PRad), a high-precision e-p experiment that was established after the discrepancy was identified. We used a magnetic-spectrometer-free method along with a windowless hydrogen gas target, which overcame several limitations of previous e-p experiments and enabled measurements at very small forward-scattering angles. Our result, r.sub.p = 0.831 [plus or minus] 0.007.sub.stat [plus or minus] 0.012.sub.syst femtometres, is smaller than the most recent high-precision e-p measurement.sup.5 and 2.7 standard deviations smaller than the average of all e-p experimental results.sup.6. The smaller r.sub.p we have now measured supports the value found by two previous muonic hydrogen experiments.sup.1,7. In addition, our finding agrees with the revised value (announced in 2019) for the Rydberg constant.sup.8--one of the most accurately evaluated fundamental constants in physics.