Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
7 result(s) for "Gallego del Sol, Francisca"
Sort by:
Engineering Penicillium expansum antifungal proteins unveils new clues about their mode of action
Fungal antifungal proteins (AFPs) are promising biofungicides. PeAfpA and PeAfpB from Penicillium expansum show different activity profiles and potency, with PeAfpA being more active. Based on the PeAfpB solved structure, we had previously designed PeAfpB-PeAfpA chimeras that showed different properties. From these, we engineer here two additional variants, chPeAFPV6 and chPeAFPV7, that revealed novel aspects of the AFP structure, antifungal determinants and mechanism. chPeAFPV6, with a single E11K mutation in the loop L1 that is part of the γ-core motif, increased PeAfpB antifungal activity to that of PeAfpA against filamentous fungi but not yeasts, and promoted internalisation into Penicillium digitatum hyphae . However, changes in loop L3 of PeAfpB as in chPeAFPV7 abolished this increase, resulting in an inactive protein that still internalised. Overall, internalisation is neither sufficient nor essential for killing P. digitatum . Antifungal activity did not correlate with reactive oxygen species production, suggesting that oxidative burst is a fungal stress defence rather than a killing mechanism. Although cell permeabilisation was associated with antifungal activity, it does not seem to be a primary mode of action. Structural analysis showed interactions between the γ-core motif and loop L3, and suggests the importance of the conformation of the E7 residue of PeAfpB. Additionally, PeAfpA was identified as a protein able to penetrate Candida auris by a cell wall-dependent mechanism, and kill yeast cells. This study highlights the potential of the PeAfpB scaffold for engineering new-to-nature AFPs and provides novel insights into their modes of action, paving the way for future applications. Key points A single amino acid change in the γ-core of PeAfpB enhances antifungal potency Loop L3 of PeAfpB may block activity through interaction with the γ-core Antifungal activity does not correlate with ROS production
Structural Basis of Rap Phosphatase Inhibition by Phr Peptides
Two-component systems, composed of a sensor histidine kinase and an effector response regulator (RR), are the main signal transduction devices in bacteria. In Bacillus, the Rap protein family modulates complex signaling processes mediated by two-component systems, such as competence, sporulation, or biofilm formation, by inhibiting the RR components involved in these pathways. Despite the high degree of sequence homology, Rap proteins exert their activity by two completely different mechanisms of action: inducing RR dephosphorylation or blocking RR binding to its target promoter. However the regulatory mechanism involving Rap proteins is even more complex since Rap activity is antagonized by specific signaling peptides (Phr) through a mechanism that remains unknown at the molecular level. Using X-ray analyses, we determined the structure of RapF, the anti-activator of competence RR ComA, alone and in complex with its regulatory peptide PhrF. The structural and functional data presented herein reveal that peptide PhrF blocks the RapF-ComA interaction through an allosteric mechanism. PhrF accommodates in the C-terminal tetratricopeptide repeat domain of RapF by inducing its constriction, a conformational change propagated by a pronounced rotation to the N-terminal ComA-binding domain. This movement partially disrupts the ComA binding site by triggering the ComA disassociation, whose interaction with RapF is also sterically impaired in the PhrF-induced conformation of RapF. Sequence analyses of the Rap proteins, guided by the RapF-PhrF structure, unveil the molecular basis of Phr recognition and discrimination, allowing us to relax the Phr specificity of RapF by a single residue change.
A regulatory cascade controls Staphylococcus aureus pathogenicity island activation
Staphylococcal pathogenicity islands (SaPIs) are a family of closely related mobile chromosomal islands that encode and disseminate the superantigen toxins, toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 and superantigen enterotoxin B (SEB). They are regulated by master repressors, which are counteracted by helper phage–encoded proteins, thereby inducing their excision, replication, packaging and intercell transfer. SaPIs are major components of the staphylococcal mobilome, occupying five chromosomal att sites, with many strains harbouring two or more. As regulatory interactions between co-resident SaPIs could have profound effects on the spread of superantigen pathobiology, we initiated the current study to search for such interactions. Using classical genetics, we found that, with one exception, their regulatory systems do not cross-react. The exception was SaPI3, which was originally considered defective because it could not be mobilized by any known helper phage. We show here that SaPI3 has an atypical regulatory module and is induced not by a phage but by many other SaPIs, including SaPI2, SaPIbov1 and SaPIn1, each encoding a conserved protein, Sis, which counteracts the SaPI3 repressor, generating an intracellular regulatory cascade: the co-resident SaPI, when conventionally induced by a helper phage, expresses its sis gene which, in turn, induces SaPI3, enabling it to spread. Using bioinformatics analysis, we have identified more than 30 closely related coancestral SEB-encoding SaPI3 relatives occupying the same att site and controlled by a conserved regulatory module, immA–immR–str ′. This module is functionally analogous but unrelated to the typical SaPI regulatory module, stl–str . As SaPIs are phage satellites, SaPI3 and its relatives are SaPI satellites. Staphylococcus aureus pathogenicity islands are not all equal and can be satellites of pathogenicity islands or satellites of helper phages in a beguiling regulatory triad that enables pathogenicity island transfer.
Insights into the mechanism of action of the arbitrium communication system in SPbeta phages
The arbitrium system is employed by phages of the SPbeta family to communicate with their progeny during infection to decide either to follow the lytic or the lysogenic cycle. The system is controlled by a peptide, AimP, that binds to the regulator AimR, inhibiting its DNA-binding activity and expression of aim X. Although the structure of AimR has been elucidated for phages SPβ and phi3T, there is still controversy regarding the molecular mechanism of AimR function, with two different proposed models for SPβ. In this study, we deepen our understanding of the system by solving the structure of an additional AimR that shows chimerical characteristics with the SPβ receptor. The crystal structures of this AimR (apo, AimP-bound and DNA-bound) together with in vitro and in vivo analyses confirm a mechanism of action by AimP-induced conformational restriction, shedding light on peptide specificity and cross regulation with relevant biological implications. The arbitrium system is a peptide-based communication system to coordinate the lysis-lysogenic cycle of phages infecting bacteria. Here Gallego del Sol et al. provide the crystal structure of Aim-receptor of Katmira phage infecting B. subtilis in apo, peptide-bound and DNA-bound form.
Antagonistic interactions between phage and host factors control arbitrium lysis–lysogeny decision
Phages can use a small-molecule communication arbitrium system to coordinate lysis–lysogeny decisions, but the underlying mechanism remains unknown. Here we determined that the arbitrium system in Bacillus subtilis phage phi3T modulates the bacterial toxin–antitoxin system MazE–MazF to regulate the phage life cycle. We show that phi3T expresses AimX and YosL, which bind to and inactivate MazF. AimX also inhibits the function of phi3T_93, a protein that promotes lysogeny by binding to MazE and releasing MazF. Overall, these mutually exclusive interactions promote the lytic cycle of the phage. After several rounds of infection, the phage-encoded AimP peptide accumulates intracellularly and inactivates the phage antiterminator AimR, a process that eliminates aim X expression from the aim P promoter. Therefore, when AimP increases, MazF activity promotes reversion back to lysogeny, since AimX is absent. Altogether, our study reveals the evolutionary strategy used by arbitrium to control lysis–lysogeny by domesticating and fine-tuning a phage-defence mechanism. The phage-encoded arbitrium communication system controls the activity of the host bacterial toxin–antitoxin system MazE–MazF to regulate lysis–lysogeny decision.
Arbitrium systems control lysis/lysogeny through the regulation of small antirepressor proteins
Many temperate Bacillus phages utilize the arbitrium signaling system to control lysis/lysogeny decisions. While the function of the arbitrium signal AimP and its receptor AimR are well known, it is unclear how they control lysis in most arbitrium systems. Here, we show that a large majority of arbitrium systems are embedded in an extended module with three additional components; A small antirepressor protein (AimX), the phage repressor (AimC) and an adjacent cro-like protein (AimL). AimR-dependent activation of AimX is necessary for lysis both during infection and lytic induction. Molecular analysis suggests that AimX directly binds AimC and prevents its oligomerization and binding to its regulated aimL promoter. Our work therefore uncovers the main mechanism by which arbitrium systems regulate lysis and point to the central role of small proteins in phage decision making.
Phages communicate across species to shape microbial ecosystems
Arbitrium is a communication system that helps bacteriophages decide between lysis and lysogeny via secreted peptides. In arbitrium, the AimP peptide binds its cognate AimR receptor to repress aimX expression, promoting lysogeny. It has been assumed that each AimR responds exclusively to its own AimP. Here, we question this view by demonstrating cross-communication between distinct arbitrium systems. Using prototypical arbitrium phages, we demonstrate that AimP peptides bind and repress unrelated AimR receptors, promoting lysogeny and reducing prophage induction. Structural and binding assays reveal conserved residues enabling cross-recognition while preserving specificity. In mixed lysogenic cultures, these interactions shape induction outcomes, demonstrating ecological relevance. We extent these findings to infection contexts, showing that arbitrium signalling influences outcomes in cells harbouring prophages with compatible communicating systems. These findings reveal that phages engage in cross-species communication, a trait restricted to more complex life forms, challenging our understanding of how these elements reshape microbial communities.