Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
202 result(s) for "Han, HH"
Sort by:
Efficacy of human rotavirus vaccine against rotavirus gastroenteritis during the first 2 years of life in European infants: randomised, double-blind controlled study
We aimed to assess the efficacy of the oral live attenuated human rotavirus vaccine Rotarix (RIX4414) for prevention of rotavirus gastroenteritis in European infants during their first 2 years of life. 3994 study participants were enrolled from six countries and were randomly assigned two oral doses of either RIX4414 (n=2646) or placebo (n=1348), which were coadministered with the first two doses of specific childhood vaccinations. Follow-up for gastroenteritis episodes was undertaken from 2 weeks post-dose two through the two consecutive rotavirus seasons following vaccinations (combined efficacy follow-up period; mean duration 17 months [SD 1·6]). Our primary endpoint was vaccine efficacy against rotavirus gastroenteritis of any severity during the first efficacy follow-up period (2 weeks post-dose two to the end of the first rotavirus season). Stool specimens obtained during gastroenteritis episodes were tested for rotavirus by ELISA and typed by RT-PCR. Episodes scoring 11 or greater on the 20-point Vesikari scale were classified as severe. Analysis was according to protocol. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00140686 (eTrack102247). 120 infants were excluded from the according-to-protocol analysis. During the first efficacy follow-up period (mean duration 5·7 months [SD 1·2]), 24 of 2572 infants allocated RIX4414 versus 94 of 1302 given placebo had rotavirus gastroenteritis episodes of any severity, resulting in a vaccine efficacy of 87·1% (95% CI 79·6–92·1; p<0·0001). For the combined efficacy follow-up period, vaccine efficacy against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis was 90·4% (85·1–94·1; p<0·0001), for admission owing to rotavirus gastroenteritis 96·0% (83·8–99·5; p<0·0001), and for rotavirus-related medical attention 83·8% (76·8–88·9; p<0.0001), and significant protection against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis by circulating G1, G2, G3, G4, and G9 rotavirus types was shown. In a European setting, two doses of RIX4414 coadministered with childhood vaccines provided high protection against any and severe rotavirus gastroenteritis, with an overall reduction of admissions for gastroenteritis over two consecutive rotavirus epidemic seasons.
Safety and efficacy of human rotavirus vaccine during the first 2 years of life in Asian infants: Randomised, double-blind, controlled study
This study evaluates the safety and efficacy against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis of the oral live attenuated human rotavirus vaccine RIX4414 ( Rotarix™) during the first 2 years of life in Asian infants from high-income countries. Healthy infants were enrolled to receive 2 doses of RIX4414 ( N = 5359) or placebo ( N = 5349). From 2 weeks post-dose 2 to 2 years of age, vaccine efficacy was 96.1% (95%CI:85.1%; 99.5%) against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis, 100% (95%CI:80.8%; 100%) against wild-type G1P[8] and 93.6% (95%CI:74.7%; 99.3%) against circulating non-G1 rotavirus types. No intussusception cases were reported within 31 days post-vaccination. RIX4414 shows a good safety profile and offers high protection during the first 2 years of life with potentially significant public health impact in this population.
Evaluation of RIX4414, A Live, Attenuated Rotavirus Vaccine, in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Trial Involving 2464 Singaporean Infants
Background At present, no rotavirus vaccine is commercially available for use worldwide. Hence, a live, attenuated monovalent vaccine was developed with human strain RIX4414 (G1P1A P[8] specificity). Vaccination trials involving infants are ongoing in developed and developing countries. Methods This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at pediatric hospitals and polyclinics in Singapore for the evaluation of the immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and efficacy of 2 oral doses of RIX4414. In total, 2464 healthy infants (who were 11–17 weeks old when the first dose was administered, which is in accordance with the local immunization schedule) were enrolled to receive RIX4414 at 3 concentrations of virus (104.7, 105.2, or 106.1 focus-forming units) or placebo at 1-month intervals, concomitantly with routinely administered infant vaccines. Results The RIX4414 vaccine was highly immunogenic, and virtually all vaccine recipients (98%–100%) experienced “vaccine take” (i.e., a combined immunogenicity end point based on seroconversion and/or shedding of RIX4414 in postvaccination stool samples) after receipt of 2 doses at all 3 dosage levels. Depending on the virus concentration, the anti-rotavirus IgA seroconversion rate varied from 76% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68%–83%) to 91% (95% CI, 85%–95%). Two doses of RIX4414 were well tolerated, with no increase in high fever, severe diarrhea, or vomiting after either dose or with increased viral concentration, compared with placebo. There was no observed interference with routine vaccinations of infants when RIX4414 was coadministered. The calculated efficacy of RIX4414 against rotavirus gastroenteritis was 82% (P = .046); however, this result was considered to be of limited conclusive value because of the low number of rotavirus gastroenteritis episodes identified during the follow-up period. Conclusions The live, attenuated rotavirus vaccine (RIX4414) was well tolerated and highly immunogenic in Singaporean infants. The immunogenicity of routinely administered infant vaccines was not impaired by concomitant administration of RIX4414 vaccine.
Immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of the human rotavirus vaccine RIX4414 oral suspension (liquid formulation) in Finnish infants
The lyophilized formulation of a human rotavirus vaccine, Rotarix™ (RIX4414) is highly immunogenic. In order to comply with the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommendation, a liquid formulation of the vaccine that does not require reconstitution was developed. The immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of the liquid formulation were compared with lyophilized formulation in two Finnish studies. In Study A infants aged 6–12 weeks received two doses of the lyophilized or liquid formulation of the vaccine or placebo following a 0,1 month schedule. In Study B, infants aged 10–17 weeks received two doses of either liquid or lyophilized formulation of the vaccine. In both studies, anti-rotavirus IgA antibodies were assessed pre-vaccination and one month post-Dose 2. In Study A, the anti-rotavirus seroconversion rate was 90% (95% CI: 81.2–95.6%) and 83.7% (95% CI: 74.2–90.8%) in the groups that received the liquid and the lyophilized formulation of RIX4414, respectively; the respective anti-rotavirus IgA seroconversion rates in Study B were 88.6% (95% CI: 86.1–90.8%) and 90.5% (95% CI: 86.2–93.8%). Reactogenicity and safety profiles of the two vaccine formulations were similar. Liquid formulation of the rotavirus vaccine allows greater flexibility in supply and reduces logistical costs.
Safety and immunogenicity of S-Trimer (SCB-2019), a protein subunit vaccine candidate for COVID-19 in healthy adults: a phase 1, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
As part of the accelerated development of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), we report a dose-finding and adjuvant justification study of SCB-2019, a protein subunit vaccine candidate containing a stabilised trimeric form of the spike (S)-protein (S-Trimer) combined with two different adjuvants. Our study is a phase 1, randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial at a specialised clinical trials centre in Australia. We enrolled healthy adult volunteers in two age groups: younger adults (aged 18–54 years) and older adults (aged 55–75 years). Participants were randomly allocated either vaccine or placebo using a list prepared by the study funder. Participants were to receive two doses of SCB-2019 (either 3 μg, 9 μg, or 30 μg) or a placebo (0·9% NaCl) 21 days apart. SCB-2019 either had no adjuvant (S-Trimer protein alone) or was adjuvanted with AS03 or CpG/Alum. The assigned treatment was administered in opaque syringes to maintain masking of assignments. Reactogenicity was assessed for 7 days after each vaccination. Humoral responses were measured as SCB-2019 binding IgG antibodies and ACE2-competitive blocking IgG antibodies by ELISA and as neutralising antibodies by wild-type SARS-CoV-2 microneutralisation assay. Cellular responses to pooled S-protein peptides were measured by flow-cytometric intracellular cytokine staining. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04405908; this is an interim analysis and the study is continuing. Between June 19 and Sept 23, 2020, 151 volunteers were enrolled; three people withdrew, two for personal reasons and one with an unrelated serious adverse event (pituitary adenoma). 148 participants had at least 4 weeks of follow-up after dose two and were included in this analysis (database lock, Oct 23, 2020). Vaccination was well tolerated, with two grade 3 solicited adverse events (pain in 9 μg AS03-adjuvanted and 9 μg CpG/Alum-adjuvanted groups). Most local adverse events were mild injection-site pain, and local events were more frequent with SCB-2019 formulations containing AS03 adjuvant (44–69%) than with those containing CpG/Alum adjuvant (6–44%) or no adjuvant (3–13%). Systemic adverse events were more frequent in younger adults (38%) than in older adults (17%) after the first dose but increased to similar levels in both age groups after the second dose (30% in older and 34% in younger adults). SCB-2019 with no adjuvant elicited minimal immune responses (three seroconversions by day 50), but SCB-2019 with fixed doses of either AS03 or CpG/Alum adjuvants induced high titres and seroconversion rates of binding and neutralising antibodies in both younger and older adults (anti-SCB-2019 IgG antibody geometric mean titres at day 36 were 1567–4452 with AS03 and 174–2440 with CpG/Alum). Titres in all AS03 dose groups and the CpG/Alum 30 μg group were higher than were those recorded in a panel of convalescent serum samples from patients with COVID-19. Both adjuvanted SCB-2019 formulations elicited T-helper-1-biased CD4+ T-cell responses. The SCB-2019 vaccine, comprising S-Trimer protein formulated with either AS03 or CpG/Alum adjuvants, elicited robust humoral and cellular immune responses against SARS-CoV-2, with high viral neutralising activity. Both adjuvanted vaccine formulations were well tolerated and are suitable for further clinical development. Clover Biopharmaceuticals and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations.
Immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of the human rotavirus vaccine RIX4414 (Rotarix™) oral suspension (liquid formulation) when co-administered with expanded program on immunization (EPI) vaccines in Vietnam and the Philippines in 2006–2007
Evaluation of immunogenicity and safety of a 2-dose liquid formulation of human rotavirus vaccine, RIX4414 following WHO's Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) schedule (0, 1, and 2 months; Month 0 indicates day of enrolment) in Vietnam and the Philippines. Infants aged 6–10 (mean=8.7±1.07 weeks Vietnam) and 5–10 weeks (mean=6.6±1.03 weeks Philippines) received two doses of RIX4414 vaccine (V) and one dose of placebo (PL) or three placebo doses concomitantly with commercially available diphtheria-tetanus-whole-cell pertussis, hepatitis B and oral poliovirus vaccines. The vaccination schedules were: V–V–PL, V–PL–V and PL–PL–PL (Vietnam); PL–V–V, V–PL–V and PL–PL–PL (Philippines). Anti-rotavirus seroconversion rate was assessed pre-vaccination and post-vaccination (ELISA cut-off=20U/ml). 375 infants were enrolled in each country. Seroconversion rates at one month post-Dose 2 of RIX4414 were Vietnam 63.3% (95% CI: 54.3–71.6) in V–V–PL group and 81.5% (95% CI: 73.4–88) in V–PL–V group; Philippines 70% (95% CI: 61–78) in PL–V–V group and 59.2% (95% CI: 49.8–68) in V–PL–V group. Frequencies of solicited (8-day post-each dose) and unsolicited symptoms (31-day post-each dose) were similar. Two-doses of rotavirus vaccine administered within the WHO EPI offer flexibility in existing schedule, though both schedules provides good immune responses.
Safety and immunogenicity of a purified inactivated Zika virus vaccine candidate in healthy adults: an observer-blind, randomised, phase 1 trial
Zika virus, a flavivirus transmitted by Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes, is associated with cases of congenital malformations and neurological complications. Absence of specific treatment makes a prophylactic Zika virus vaccine an unmet medical need. We assessed safety and immunogenicity of three doses of a purified, inactivated, Zika virus vaccine candidate in healthy flavivirus-naive and flavivirus-primed adults. This two-part, multicentre, observer-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial was done at seven medical clinics in the USA and two in Puerto Rico. Eligible participants were healthy adults aged 18–49 years. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1), using a sponsor-supplied randomisation scheme, to four groups to receive two intramuscular injections, 28 days apart, of saline placebo or TAK-426 containing 2 μg, 5 μg, or 10 μg antigen. Participants, investigators, and vaccine administrating personnel were masked to group assignment. Part 1 of the study assessed flavivirus-naive participants and part 2 assessed flavivirus-primed participants. The primary outcomes were safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity based on solicited local reactions and solicited systemic adverse events in the 7 days after each dose; unsolicited adverse events and serious adverse events in the 28 days after each dose; and geometric mean titres (GMTs) of neutralising anti-Zika virus antibodies at 28 days after the second dose. Safety assessments were done in all participants who received at least one dose of vaccine. Immunogenicity assessments were in the per-protocol set, comprising all participants who received at least one dose of vaccine and provided valid serology results at baseline and at least one post-vaccination timepoint, with no major protocol violations. The trial is ongoing and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03343626). Between Nov 13, 2017, and Oct 24, 2018, 894 volunteers were screened and 271 enrolled (125 flavivirus-naive and 146 flavivirus-primed participants). All TAK-426 doses were well tolerated with no deaths, no vaccine-related serious adverse events, and similar rates of mainly mild to moderate adverse events. TAK-426 elicited dose-dependent increases in antibody GMTs in both flavivirus-naive and flavivirus-primed participants. 28 days after dose 2, plaque-reduction neutralisation test GMTs in flavivirus-naive participants were 1130 (95% CI 749–1703) in the 2 μg TAK-426 group, 1992 (1401–2833) in the 5 μg TAK-426 group, and 3690 (2677–5086) in the 10 μg TAK-426 group. In pairwise comparisons, responses after two vaccinations in the 10 μg group were significantly greater than in the 2 μg group (GMT ratio 3·27 [95% CI 1·98–5·39], p<0·0001) and the 5 μg group (GMT ratio 1·85 [1·15–2·98], p=0·012). TAK-426 was well tolerated, with an acceptable safety profile, and was immunogenic in both flavivirus-naive and flavivirus-primed adults. Based on the safety and immunogenicity profiles of all TAK-426 doses assessed, the 10 μg TAK-426 dose was selected for further clinical development. Takeda Vaccines and the US Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority. For the Spanish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Impact of previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and of S-Trimer (SCB-2019) COVID-19 vaccination on the risk of reinfection: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2 and 3 trial
We previously reported the efficacy of the adjuvanted-protein COVID-19 vaccine candidate S-Trimer (SCB-2019) in adults who showed no evidence of previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we aimed to investigate the extent of protection afforded by previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 on subsequent COVID-19 infection, as well as the efficacy, safety, and reactogenicity of SCB-2019 in participants who were enrolled in the Study evaluating Protective-Efficacy and safety of Clover's Trimeric Recombinant protein-based and Adjuvanted COVID-19 vaccine (SPECTRA) trial who had already been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 before vaccination. In a phase 2 and 3 multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial (SPECTRA) done at 31 sites in five countries, participants were randomly assigned 1:1 using the Cenduit Interactive Response Technology system (IQVIA, Durham, NC, USA), with a block size of six, to receive two doses of either SCB-2019 or placebo 21 days apart. The primary outcomes of the SPECTRA trial were vaccine efficacy, measured by real-time PCR (rtPCR)-confirmed COVID-19 of any severity, with onset from 14 days after the second vaccine dose, as well as the safety and solicited local and systemic adverse events in the phase 2 subset. Here, we present secondary analyses to calculate the protective efficacy due to previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 against reinfection with COVID-19 according to severity in SPECTRA participants who had evidence of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 at baseline, including efficacy against identified viral variants, as well as efficacy of SCB-2019 vaccination in this population. We enrolled 30 174 participants between March 24, 2021, and Aug 10, 2021. In the 14 670 participants who were randomly assigned to receive placebo, there were 418 (2·8%) confirmed cases of COVID-19; 65 (0·9%) of 7339 SARS-CoV-2-exposed participants, and 353 (4·8%) of 7331 SARS-CoV-2-naive participants (attack rates of 5·5 cases per 100 person-years for SARS-CoV-2-exposed participants and 32·4 cases per 100 person-years for SARS-CoV-2-naive participants). Protective efficacy due to previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 was 83·2% (95% CI 78·0–87·3) against any COVID-19, 92·5% (82·9–97·3) against moderate-to-severe COVID-19, and 100% (59·3–100) against severe COVID-19; no SARS-CoV-2-exposed participants had hospitalisation associated with COVID-19. Protective efficacy against variants were 100% for alpha (B.1.1.7) and lambda (C.37) variants, 88·6% (14·9–99·7) for B.1.623, 93·6% (80·1–98·7) for gamma (P.1), and 92·4% (81·2–97·6) for mu (B.1.621) variants, and lowest against beta (B.1.351; 72·2% [33·1–89·9]) and delta (B.1.617.2; 77·2% [61·3–87·2]) variants. In addition, one dose of SCB-2019 had 49·9% (1·5–75·6) efficacy against any symptomatic COVID-19, and two doses had 64·2% (26·5–83·8) efficacy. SCB-2019 was well tolerated in SARS-CoV-2-exposed participants, but was associated with higher rates of injection site pain (89 [33·8%] of 263 participants) than placebo (16 [6·7%] of 239 participants). Rates of solicited systemic adverse events, severe adverse events, and serious adverse events were similar between vaccine and placebo groups, and with rates in SARS-CoV-2-naive vaccine recipients. Previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 decreased the risk and severity of subsequent COVID-19 infection, even against newly emerging variants. Protection is further enhanced by one or two doses of SCB-2019. Clover Biopharmaceuticals, The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI).
Effect of Human Rotavirus Vaccine on Severe Diarrhea in African Infants
Rotavirus is the leading cause of gastroenteritis in children worldwide. In this report, the efficacy of the rotavirus vaccine among 4417 children in Malawi and South Africa was studied in a randomized trial. Severe rotavirus gastroenteritis occurred in 4.9% of the infants in the placebo group as compared with 1.9% of the infants in the pooled vaccine group; the vaccine efficacy was 61.2%. In this trial of rotavirus vaccine in Malawi and South Africa, severe rotavirus gastroenteritis occurred in 4.9% of the infants in the placebo group as compared with 1.9% of the infants in the pooled vaccine group; the vaccine efficacy was 61.2%. Rotavirus is the most important cause of severe gastroenteritis among children worldwide. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that globally 527,000 deaths occur each year among children as a result of rotavirus infection 1 ; more than 230,000 of the deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa. Six of the seven countries with the highest mortality due to rotavirus diarrhea are located in Africa. 2 Similarly, data generated from global rotavirus surveillance networks highlight the burden of hospitalizations for rotavirus 3 ; among young children hospitalized for acute diarrhea, the median detection rate for rotavirus was 40% globally and 41% in Africa. Therefore, measures to . . .
Immunogenicity of an adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 trimeric S-protein subunit vaccine (SCB-2019) in SARS-CoV-2-naïve and exposed individuals in a phase 2/3, double-blind, randomized study
•SCB-2019 is a protein subunit vaccine candidate against COVID-19.•SCB-2019 contains the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein adjuvanted with CpG-1018/alum.•A single dose of SCB-2019 was immunogenic in SARS-CoV-2-exposed individuals.•Two doses are required to induce immune response in SARS-CoV-2-naïve individuals.•SCB-2019 induced cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 variants. We evaluated immunogenicity of SCB-2019, a subunit vaccine candidate containing a pre-fusion trimeric form of the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S)-protein adjuvanted with CpG-1018/alum. The phase 2/3, double-blind, randomized SPECTRA trial was conducted in five countries in participants aged ≥ 18 years, either SARS-CoV-2-naïve or previously exposed. Participants were randomly assigned to receive two doses of SCB-2019 or placebo administered intramuscularly 21 days apart. In the phase 2 part of the study, on days 1, 22, and 36, neutralizing antibodies were measured by pseudovirus and wild-type virus neutralization assays to SARS-CoV-2 prototype and variants, and ACE2-receptor-binding antibodies and SCB-2019–binding antibodies were measured by ELISA. Cell-mediated immunity was measured by intracellular cytokine staining via flow cytometry. 1601 individuals were enrolled between 24 March and 13 September 2021 and received at least one vaccine dose. Immunogenicity analysis was conducted in a phase 2 subset of 691 participants, including 428 SARS-CoV-2-naïve (381 vaccine and 47 placebo recipients) and 263 SARS-CoV-2-exposed (235 vaccine and 28 placebo recipients). In SARS-CoV-2-naïve participants, GMTs of neutralizing antibodies against prototype virus increased 2 weeks post-second dose (day 36) compared to baseline (224 vs 12.7 IU/mL). Seroconversion rate was 82.5 %. In SARS-CoV-2-exposed participants, one SCB-2019 dose increased GMT of neutralizing antibodies by 48.3-fold (1276.1 IU/mL on day 22) compared to baseline. Seroconversion rate was 92.4 %. Increase was marginal post-second dose. SCB-2019 also showed cross-neutralization capability against nine variants, including Omicron, in SARS-CoV-2-exposed participants at day 36. SCB-2019 stimulated Th1-biased cell-mediated immunity to the S-protein in both naïve and exposed participants. The vaccine was well tolerated, no safety concerns were raised from the study. A single dose of SCB-2019 was immunogenic in SARS-CoV-2-exposed individuals, whereas two doses were required to induce immune response in SARS-CoV-2-naïve individuals. SCB-2019 elicited a cross-neutralizing response against emergent SARS-CoV-2 variants at antibody levels associated with clinical protection, underlining its potential as a booster. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04672395; EudraCT: 2020-004272-17.