Explore the vast range of titles available.

Simplified treatment regimens for HIV management may increase adherence. In this open-label, randomized, controlled trial, longer-acting (monthly) injectable cabotegravir plus rilpivirine was compared with standard oral treatment. At 48 weeks, similar viral suppression was seen with the two regimens.

Background Cabotegravir (CAB) and rilpivirine (RPV) are under development as a novel long-acting (LA) regimen for maintenance of HIV virologic suppression. Pooled Week 48 data from pivotal Phase 3 trials demonstrated noninferiority of CAB LA + RPV LA vs. current antiretroviral regimen (CAR) on the primary endpoint, proportion of subjects with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 c/mL (1.9% and 1.7%, respectively). Adherence to dosing visits, use of oral dosing (bridging) to cover planned missed injections and injection tolerability were examined for subjects in the ATLAS and FLAIR studies. Methods Virologically suppressed subjects (HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL) were randomized to switch to CAB LA + RPV LA or to continue CAR. On-time injections occurred Q4 weeks within a +7-day dosing window of the projected dosing date. Adherence to LA therapy was calculated as the number of on-time injection visits divided by the number of expected dosing visits through Week 48. Injection visits outside the pre-specified window and missed injection visits with/without the use of oral dosing were quantified. Injection tolerability was assessed via adverse event reporting. Results A total of 14,682 injections of CAB and RPV were administered to 581 subjects during 6,920 injection visits. 98% of injection visits took place within the allowed ±7-day dosing window with 3,194 (46%) on the projected dosing date. Forty-six (<1%) injection visits were early and 106 (2%) were late. Oral bridging was used in 16 subjects overall; 8 planned missed injection visits were successfully covered, with no change to virologic suppression status. No subject with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 c/mL at Week 48 had missed/late injection visits. 25% (3,663/14,682) of injections were associated with local injection site reactions (ISRs). The most common ISR was pain (3,087/3,663 = 84%). Most ISRs were grade 1–2 (99%), short duration (median 3 days), with few associated discontinuations (<1%). Conclusion Subjects receiving CAB LA + RPV LA demonstrated high rates of adherence to injection visits through week 48, with 98% of injections occurring within the ±7-day dosing window. Oral bridging with CAB and RPV was an effective strategy for maintaining viral load suppression to cover missed injection visits. Injections were well-tolerated with few associated discontinuations. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.

Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and systematic anticoagulation with warfarin reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality after myocardial infarction when given alone. In the Coumadin Aspirin Reinfarction Study (CARS), we aimed to find out whether a combination of low-dose warfarin and low-dose aspirin would give superior results to standard aspirin monotherapy without excessive bleeding risk. We used a randomised double-blind study design. At 293 sites, we randomly assigned 8803 patients who had had myocardial infarction, treatment with 160 mg aspirin, 3 mg warfarin with 80 mg aspirin, or 1 mg warfarin with 80 mg aspirin. Patients took a single tablet daily, and attended for prothrombin time (PT) measurements at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 12, and then every 3 months. Patients were followed up for a maximum of 33 months (median 14 months). The primary event was first occurrence of reinfarction, non-fatal ischaemic stroke, or cardiovascular death. 1-year life-table estimates for the primary event were 8·6% (95% Cl 7·6–9·6) for 160 mg aspirin, 8·4% (7·4–9·4) for 3 mg warfarin with 80 mg aspirin, and 8·8% (7·6–10) for 1 mg warfarin with 80 mg aspirin. Primary comparisons were done with all follow-up data. The relative risk of the primary event for the 160 mg aspirin group compared with the 3 mg warfarin with 80 mg aspirin group was 0·95 (0·81–1·12, p=0·57). For spontaneous major haemorrhage (not procedure related), 1-year life-table estimates were 0·74% (0·43–1·1) in the 160 mg aspirin group and 1·4% (0·94–1·8) in the 3 mg warfarin with 80 mg aspirin group (p=0·014 log rank on follow-up). For the 3382 patients assigned 3 mg warfarin with 80 mg aspirin, the INR results were: at week 1 (n=2985) median 1·51 (IQR 1·23–2·13); at week 4 (n=2701) 1·27 (1·13–1·64); at month 6 (n=2145) 1·19 (1·08–1·44). Low, fixed-dose warfarin (1 mg or 3 mg) combined with low-dose aspirin (80 mg) in patients who have had myocardial infarction does not provide clinical benefit beyond that achievable with 160 mg aspirin monotherapy.