Explore the vast range of titles available.

The global burden of viral hepatitis is substantial; in terms of mortality, hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infections are on a par with HIV, malaria and tuberculosis, among the top four global infectious diseases. In 2016, the 194 Member States of the World Health Organization committed to eliminating viral hepatitis as a public health threat by 2030, with a particular focus on hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection. With only 10 years to go until the 2030 deadline is reached, and although much progress has been made towards elimination, there are still some important gaps in terms of policy and progress. In this Viewpoint, we asked a selection of scientists and clinicians working in the viral hepatitis field for their opinions on whether elimination of viral hepatitis by 2030 is feasible, what the key areas of progress are and what the focus for the next 10 years and beyond should be for viral hepatitis elimination.Viral hepatitis is a global public health problem. In this Viewpoint, we asked a selection of scientists and clinicians working in the viral hepatitis field to provide their opinions on progress and pitfalls towards the 2030 viral hepatitis elimination goals.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a prevalent metabolic disorder among individuals with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), contributing to additional adverse impacts on both hepatic and extrahepatic systems. Existing evidence suggests a potential positive association between CHB and the development of insulin resistance and T2DM. The presence of T2DM in CHB patients is associated with an increased risk of liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurrence. Moreover, it elevates the risk of non‐liver cancers and all‐cause mortality in this population. T2DM also serves as the key element in metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease, which is prevalent in the CHB population. Although specific guidelines for managing T2DM in CHB patients have not been proposed, some studies indicated that intensive glycemic control may benefit the prognosis of these patients. Additionally, specific antidiabetic agents, such as metformin and thiazolidinediones, promise to reduce HCC risk. However, unresolved questions, including the optimal glycemic control target and the selection of antidiabetic agents for CHB patients, remain and thus warrant further investigations through well‐designed prospective trials. Implementing a standardized protocol encompassing regular monitoring, risk stratification, and early intervention using a multidisciplinary framework may improve the outcomes of diabetic CHB patients.

Acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a global health concern with substantial geographical variation in the incidence rate. People who have received unsafe medical procedures, used injection drugs, and lived with human immunodeficiency virus are reported to be most susceptible to acute HCV infection. The diagnosis of acute HCV infection is particularly challenging in immunocompromised, reinfected, and superinfected patients due to difficulty in detecting anti-HCV antibody seroconversion and HCV ribonucleic acid from a previously negative antibody response. With an excellent treatment effect on chronic HCV infection, recently, clinical trials investigating the benefit of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) treatment for acute HCV infection have been conducted. Based on the results of cost-effectiveness analysis, DAAs should be initiated early in acute HCV infection prior to spontaneous viral clearance. Compared to the standard 8–12 week-course of DAAs for chronic HCV infection, DAAs treatment duration may be shortened to 6–8 weeks in acute HCV infection without compromising the efficacy. Standard DAA regimens provide comparable efficacy in treating HCV-reinfected patients and DAA-naïve ones. For cases contracting acute HCV infection from HCV-viremic liver transplant, a 12-week course of pangenotypic DAAs is suggested. While for cases contracting acute HCV infection from HCV-viremic non-liver solid organ transplants, a short course of prophylactic or pre-emptive DAAs is suggested. Currently, prophylactic HCV vaccines are unavailable. In addition to treatment scale-up for acute HCV infection, practice of universal precaution, harm reduction, safe sex, and vigilant surveillance after viral clearance remain critical in reducing HCV transmission.

Using commercial quantitative assays, quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg) has improved our understanding and management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). The HBsAg level is highest in the immune tolerance phase, starts to decline during the immune clearance phase, and decreases slowly but progressively after hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion. The HBsAg level is lowest in individuals with an inactive carrier state but higher in those who develop HBeAg-negative hepatitis. It has been shown that a reduction of HBsAg by 1 log IU/mL or more reflects improved host immune control of HBV infection. A combination of HBsAg <1000 IU/mL and HBV-DNA <2000 IU/mL can identify a 3-year inactive state in a genotype D HBeAg-negative carrier population. In the Asian-Pacific region, where HBV genotypes B and C are dominant, HBsAg levels of ≤10–100 IU/mL predict HBsAg loss over time. As to the prediction of disease progression, low-viremic carriers with HBsAg >1000 IU/mL have been shown to be at higher risks of HBeAg-negative hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma than those with HBsAg <1000 IU/mL. Although qHBsAg has been widely used in CHB patients receiving pegylated interferon therapy, the HBsAg decline is slow and does not correlate with HBV-DNA levels during nucleos(t)ide analogue (NUC) therapy. However, a rapid HBsAg decline during NUC therapy may identify patients who will finally clear HBsAg. A 6- to 12-monthly assessment of HBsAg level could be considered during NUC therapy. Taking these lines of evidence together, qHBsAg can complement HBV-DNA levels to optimize the management of CHB patients in our daily clinical practice.

BackgroundChronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a major global health concern primarily due to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development.ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify patients with inactive CHB with negligible HCC risk using hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels, which is the key to define partial HBV cure.DesignData from 2674 patients with inactive CHB (non-cirrhotic, hepatitis B e antigen negative, normal alanine transaminase (ALT), HBV DNA <2000 IU/mL) in the ERADICATE-B and REVEAL-HBV cohorts were analysed. The primary endpoint was HCC development, with HBsAg levels used to identify patients with annual HCC risk <0.2%. Results were validated using the NTUH-iMD cohort.ResultsOver a median follow-up of 26.3 years, 76 patients developed HCC. Among 989 patients with inactive CHB with HBsAg<100 IU/mL, the annual HCC incidence was 0.08% (95% CI 0.05% to 0.13%), lower than those with HBsAg≥100 IU/mL (adjusted HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.61). Their HCC risk was lower than the recommended threshold for HCC surveillance and was close to the risk of the general population. Even for older patients recommended for HCC surveillance, those with HBsAg levels <100 IU/mL were associated with HCC risk lower than the surveillance threshold. Moreover, patients with inactive CHB with negligible HCC risk could be identified by combining HBsAg <100 IU/mL and normal ALT levels, without the need for HBV DNA testing, as validated in the NTUH-iMD cohort.ConclusionSerum HBsAg levels <100 IU/mL effectively identify patients with inactive CHB with negligible HCC risk and limited viral activity, which is important in optimising surveillance strategies and defining partial HBV cure.

In a phase 2 trial involving participants taking a nucleoside or nucleotide analogue, 23% of those assigned to receive xalnesiran plus pegylated interferon alfa-2a had HBsAg loss at 24 weeks after the end of treatment.

Covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) is the transcriptional template of hepatitis B virus (HBV). Extensive research over the past decades has unveiled the important role of cccDNA in the natural history and antiviral treatment of chronic HBV infection. cccDNA can persist in patients recovering from acute HBV infection for decades. This explains why HBV reactivation occasionally occurs in patients with resolved hepatitis B receiving intensive immunosuppressive agents. In addition, although advances in antiviral treatment dramatically improve the adverse outcomes of chronic hepatitis B (CHB), accumulating evidence demonstrates that current antiviral treatments alone, be they nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) or interferon (IFN), fail to cure most CHB patients because of the persistent cccDNA. NA suppresses HBV replication by directly inhibiting viral polymerase, while IFN enhances host immunity against HBV infection. Viral rebound often occurs after discontinuation of antiviral treatment. The loss of cccDNA can be induced by non-cytolytic destruction of cccDNA or immune-mediated killing of infected hepatocytes. It is known that NA has no direct effect on viral transcription or cccDNA stability. Therefore, the long half-life of hepatocytes leads to a very slow decline in cccDNA in patients under antiviral therapy. Novel antiviral agents targeting cccDNA or cccDNA-containing hepatocytes are thus required for curing chronic HBV infection.