Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
2
result(s) for
"Kommareddy, Sushma"
Sort by:
Fabrication of cell culture-derived influenza vaccine dissolvable microstructures and evaluation of immunogenicity in guinea pigs
by
Gallorini, Simona
,
Bonificio, Amanda
,
O’Hagan, Derek T.
in
Administration, Cutaneous
,
Advantages
,
Allergy and Immunology
2015
Microstructure patches provide an opportunity for simple, effective, and safe vaccine administration, while achieving the desired immune response. We have evaluated the MicroCor® transdermal system for cell culture-derived trivalent influenza vaccine administration. Influenza monovalent purified bulk vaccines (monobulks) (H1N1, H3N2, B) were concentrated by tangential flow filtration, lyophilized, and formulated with biocompatible excipients to form the microstructure array dissolvable tips. Standard single radial immunodiffusion (SRID) determined that the influenza antigens retained potency through the formulation and microstructure array fabrication processes. Array stability was evaluated for storage in both refrigerated and room temperature conditions. Microstructure mechanical strength was confirmed by application to excised pig skin, resulting in successful skin penetration and tip dissolution within 5min of microstructure insertion. Guinea pigs immunized with influenza vaccine-loaded microstructures had hemagglutinin inhibition (HI) and IgG titers comparable to those obtained by intramuscular injection. After two immunizations, serum HI titers for all immunized groups were greater than 40 (>4-fold higher than the untreated group). These data demonstrate the feasibility for the development of skin delivery technologies that are compatible with cell culture-derived influenza vaccines.
Journal Article
Sublingual immunization with a subunit influenza vaccine elicits comparable systemic immune response as intramuscular immunization, but also induces local IgA and TH17 responses
by
Bertholet, Sylvie
,
Gallorini, Simona
,
Bonificio, Amanda
in
adaptive immunity
,
adjuvants
,
Adjuvants, Immunologic - administration & dosage
2014
•This paper provides a novel and original strategy to develop subunit vaccines for sublingual delivery.•Sublingual administration of subunit influenza Ags adjuvanted with LTK63 elicited comparable antibody titers to intramuscular immunization.•The sublingual delivery elicited Ag-specific mucosal IgA with neutralizing activity, contributing to anti-influenza defenses.•The mucosal route in combination with LTK63 elicited an Ag-specific Th17 response that might play a role in protection against influenza.•Sublingual delivery of an adjuvanted subunit influenza vaccine could be an effective alternative to conventional intramuscular vaccines.
Influenza is a vaccine-preventable disease that remains a major health problem world-wide. Needle and syringe are still the primary delivery devices, and injection of liquid vaccine into the muscle is still the primary route of immunization. Vaccines could be more convenient and effective if they were delivered by the mucosal route. Elicitation of systemic and mucosal innate and adaptive immune responses, such as pathogen neutralizing antibodies (including mucosal IgA at the site of pathogen entry) and CD4+ T-helper cells (especially the Th17 subset), have a critical role in vaccine-mediated protection. In the current study, a sublingual subunit influenza vaccine formulated with or without mucosal adjuvant was evaluated for systemic and mucosal immunogenicity and compared to intranasal and intramuscular vaccination. Sublingual administration of adjuvanted influenza vaccine elicited comparable antibody titers to those elicited by intramuscular immunization with conventional influenza vaccine. Furthermore, influenza-specific Th17 cells or neutralizing mucosal IgA were detected exclusively after mucosal immunization.
Journal Article