Explore the vast range of titles available.

Failure to undergo activation-induced cell death due to global dysregulation of apoptosis is the pathogenic hallmark of large granular lymphocyte (LGL) leukemia. Consequently, immunosuppressive agents are rational choices for treatment. This first prospective trial in LGL leukemia was a multicenter, phase 2 clinical trial evaluating methotrexate (MTX) at 10 mg/m 2 orally weekly as initial therapy (step 1). Patients failing MTX were eligible for treatment with cyclophosphamide at 100 mg orally daily (step 2). The overall response in step 1 was 38% with 95% confidence interval (CI): 26 and 53%. The overall response in step 2 was 64% with 95% CI: 35 and 87%. The median overall survival for patients with anemia was 69 months with a 95% CI lower bound of 46 months and an upper bound not yet reached. The median overall survival for patients with neutropenia has not been reached 13 years from study activation. Serum biomarker studies confirmed the inflammatory milieu of LGL but were not a priori predictive of response. We identify a gene expression signature that correlates with response and may be STAT3 mutation driven. Immunosuppressive therapies have efficacy in LGL leukemia. Gene signature and mutational profiling may be an effective tool in determining whether MTX is an appropriate therapy.

AML treatment presents significant challenges in the elderly, who more often have poor risk cytogenetic and molecular markers, comorbidities and compromised performance status. Although population-based studies indicate that treated patients’ survival is better than those who are not treated, there is an understandable reluctance of physicians to choose aggressive therapy. Even in this older population 40–60% CR rates are achievable. Several scoring systems and web-based programs help to predict TRM and CR rates. These sources can assist physicians in the difficult decision-making process of aggressive therapy in an individual patient. Clofarabine and hypomethylating agents are reasonable options and can induce CR in patients who cannot receive standard induction with anthracyclines and cytarabine. Despite encouraging CR rates, median survival remains short (<12 months) in elderly AML patients. Even those patients achieving CR have limited long-term survival (∼20% at 3 years) without allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). AlloHCT is feasible and can provide approximately 40% survival at 2 years in appropriately selected patients. Although increased age is associated with poorer survival, higher comorbidities and poor performance status have more negative impact than age per se . The short duration of CR demands that leukemia and transplant physicians collaborate immediately after diagnosis to move quickly toward alloHCT. This collaboration is also essential to choosing the right individuals to transplant and to bridging post-remission therapy (intermediate-dose cytarabine, a hypomethylating agent or FLT-3 inhibitor) in this sometimes frail population. Future studies should be designed not only to address who should receive alloHCT, but also to improve our understanding of AML biology and the process of its cure.

Transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) is an infrequent but devastating syndrome that occurs in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, and is associated with a variety of transplantation-related factors, including conditioning regimens, immunosuppressive agents, GVHD and opportunistic infections. Progress in managing this condition has been hampered by lack of a consensus definition and poor understanding of the pathophysiology of the disorder. Two different groups recently have proposed consensus definitions, yet they fail to distinguish the primary syndrome from the secondary causes, such as a variety of infections, medication exposure or other conditions. Increasing evidence suggests that TA-TMA is a multifactorial disorder that is distinct from thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), and likely represents the final common pathway of a number of endothelial cell insults. TA-TMA responds poorly to conventional treatment for TTP, including plasma exchange, but newer agents, including daclizumab and defibrotide show promise. In addition, other agents known to modify endothelial responses to injury, including statins, prostacyclin analogues, endothelin-receptor antagonists and free radical scavengers, may lead to improved outcomes for patients affected by this disorder.

Although reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) and non-myeloablative (NMA)-conditioning regimens have been used for over a decade, their relative efficacy vs myeloablative (MA) approaches to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with AML and myelodysplasia (MDS) is unknown. We compared disease status, donor, graft and recipient characteristics with outcomes of 3731 MA with 1448 RIC/NMA procedures performed at 217 centers between 1997 and 2004. The 5-year univariate probabilities and multivariate relative risk outcomes of relapse, TRM, disease-free survival (DFS) and OS are reported. Adjusted OS at 5 years was 34, 33 and 26% for MA, RIC and NMA transplants, respectively. NMA conditioning resulted in inferior DFS and OS, but there was no difference in DFS and OS between RIC and MA regimens. Late TRM negates early decreases in toxicity with RIC and NMA regimens. Our data suggest that higher regimen intensity may contribute to optimal survival in patients with AML/MDS, suggesting roles for both regimen intensity and graft vs leukemia in these diseases. Prospective studies comparing regimens are needed to confirm this finding and determine the optimal approach to patients who are eligible for either MA or RIC/NMA conditioning.

Several studies reported that patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who remain in long-term remission after allogeneic or autologous transplant have a shorter life expectancy, compared to the general population. However, little is known about the life expectancy of adult long-term survivors of AML who were treated with chemotherapy alone without a transplant and there have been no comparisons with survival among the general population. The current study indicates that the life expectancy of AML patients who achieved and maintained CR for at least 3 years is shorter than expected for age in the US population. This was observed also in patients who did not undergo a transplant including those who have not relapsed during the entire long follow-up period. Thus, late relapse does not explain why patients without transplants have a shortened life expectancy. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that prior chemotherapy for the underlying AML is at least a major contributing factor for the known shortened life expectancy post-transplant.

We describe outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome (MF/SS). Outcomes of 129 subjects with MF/SS reported to the Center for the International Blood and Marrow Transplant from 2000–2009. Median time from diagnosis to transplant was 30 (4–206) months and most subjects were with multiply relapsed/ refractory disease. The majority (64%) received non-myeloablative conditioning (NST) or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). NST/RIC recipients were older in age compared with myeloablative recipients (median age 51 vs 44 years, P =0.005) and transplanted in recent years. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 1 and 5 years was 19% (95% confidence interval (CI) 12–27%) and 22% (95% CI 15–31%), respectively. Risk of disease progression was 50% (95% CI 41–60%) at 1 year and 61% (95% CI 50–71%) at 5 years. PFS at 1 and 5 years was 31% (95% CI 22–40%) and 17% (95% CI 9–26%), respectively. OS at 1 and 5 years was 54% (95% CI 45–63%) and 32% (95% CI 22–44%), respectively. Allogeneic HCT in MF/SS results in 5-year survival in approximately one-third of patients and of those, half remain disease-free.

Donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) often are used after allo-SCT to augment the graft-versus-tumor effect. Timing of infusion varies according to indication, for example to treat tumor recurrence, as a planned strategy to prevent disease relapse in the setting of T-cell-depleted grafts or non-myeloablative conditioning regimens, or as a method to convert mixed to full donor chimerism. The optimal strategy of timing, use of cytotoxic conditioning, cell dose and cell product composition, and so on, for DLI administration remains unclear. Despite varied techniques, DLI may lead to 3-year disease-free survivals (DFS) in excess of 60% for all CML patients and approach 90% in patients with only molecular or cytogenetic relapse. Other hematologic malignancies appear much less responsive, as less than 50% of patients respond and provide, at best, 3-year DFS rates of 20–50%. Multiple myeloma patients have overall response rates of 40–45% after DLI, suggesting benefit in relapsed disease, but limited experiences for diseases such as Hodgkin's lymphoma, myelodysplasia and ALL preclude recommendations for use of DLI at this time. Regardless of the indication, treatment-related mortality after DLI is 5–20% and more than one-third of patients will develop acute and/or chronic GVHD after DLI. The risks of these complications appear related, in part, to donor source, cell dose and therapy prior to DLI. Although there are no definitive answers, the information gleaned from published literature suggests that DLI should be administered early after relapse or as a prophylactic strategy in patients receiving T-cell-depleted grafts, and patients with bulky or aggressive disease may benefit from disease reduction prior to DLI.

Of the 13 286 autologous haematopoietic cell transplant procedures reported in the US in 2010–2012 for plasma cell disorders, 10 557 used single agent, high-dose melphalan. Despite 30 years of clinical and pharmacokinetic (PK) experience with high-dose melphalan, and its continuing central role as cytoreductive therapy for large numbers of patients with myeloma, the pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenomics of melphalan are still in their infancy. The addition of protectant agents such as amifostine and palifermin allows dose escalation to 280 mg/m 2 , but at these doses it is cardiac, rather than gut, toxicity that is dose-limiting. Although combination with additional alkylating agents is feasible, the additional TRM may not be justified when so many post-consolidation therapies are available for myeloma patients. Current research should optimise the delivery of this single-agent chemotherapy. This includes the use of newer formulations and real-time PKs. These strategies may allow a safe and effective platform for adding synergistic novel therapies and provide a window of lymphodepletion for the addition of immunotherapies.