Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
To transplant or not: a dilemma for treatment of elderly AML patients in the twenty-first century
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
To transplant or not: a dilemma for treatment of elderly AML patients in the twenty-first century
Do you wish to request the book?
To transplant or not: a dilemma for treatment of elderly AML patients in the twenty-first century
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
To transplant or not: a dilemma for treatment of elderly AML patients in the twenty-first century
2013
Overview
AML treatment presents significant challenges in the elderly, who more often have poor risk cytogenetic and molecular markers, comorbidities and compromised performance status. Although population-based studies indicate that treated patients’ survival is better than those who are not treated, there is an understandable reluctance of physicians to choose aggressive therapy. Even in this older population 40–60% CR rates are achievable. Several scoring systems and web-based programs help to predict TRM and CR rates. These sources can assist physicians in the difficult decision-making process of aggressive therapy in an individual patient. Clofarabine and hypomethylating agents are reasonable options and can induce CR in patients who cannot receive standard induction with anthracyclines and cytarabine. Despite encouraging CR rates, median survival remains short (<12 months) in elderly AML patients. Even those patients achieving CR have limited long-term survival (∼20% at 3 years) without allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). AlloHCT is feasible and can provide approximately 40% survival at 2 years in appropriately selected patients. Although increased age is associated with poorer survival, higher comorbidities and poor performance status have more negative impact than age
per se
. The short duration of CR demands that leukemia and transplant physicians collaborate immediately after diagnosis to move quickly toward alloHCT. This collaboration is also essential to choosing the right individuals to transplant and to bridging post-remission therapy (intermediate-dose cytarabine, a hypomethylating agent or FLT-3 inhibitor) in this sometimes frail population. Future studies should be designed not only to address who should receive alloHCT, but also to improve our understanding of AML biology and the process of its cure.
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group UK,Nature Publishing Group
Subject
/ Aged
/ Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
/ Biological and medical sciences
/ Bone marrow, stem cells transplantation. Graft versus host reaction
/ Hematologic and hematopoietic diseases
/ Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - methods
/ Humans
/ Leukemia
/ Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - surgery
/ Leukemias. Malignant lymphomas. Malignant reticulosis. Myelofibrosis
/ Medicine
/ Patients
/ review
/ Survival
/ Therapy
/ Transfusions. Complications. Transfusion reactions. Cell and gene therapy
