Explore the vast range of titles available.

Dabrafenib plus trametinib treatment provides significant benefits over BRAF-inhibitor monotherapy in patients with BRAFV600E-mutant or BRAFV600K-mutant advanced melanoma; however, in many patients the disease progresses, leading to death. With many treatment options available, understanding clinical factors that predict long-term response and survival for treatments is important for optimisation of patient management. We aimed to identify clinical factors associated with long-term response and survival using pooled data from randomised trials of dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with metastatic BRAF-mutant melanoma. We did a retrospective individual data analysis based on all published randomised trials that included treatment-naive patients with BRAFV600E-mutant or BRAFV600K-mutant metastatic melanoma who received the approved dose of dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily plus trametinib 2 mg once daily. Data were pooled from patients in the BRF113220 (part C; March 26, 2010, to Jan 15, 2015), COMBI-d (May 4, 2012, to Jan 12, 2015), and COMBI-v (June 4, 2012, to March 13, 2015) randomised trials. Patients with untreated brain metastases were not permitted to enrol in these trials. Baseline factors, identified a priori based on known melanoma clinical or prognostic characteristics, were analysed for association with progression-free survival and overall survival using univariate and multivariate analyses and assessed for hierarchical effect on outcomes using regression tree analyses. We also analysed factors identified after baseline, on treatment, and at progression, for associations with survival after progression. The trials included in this analysis are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: BRF113220, number NCT01072175; COMBI-d, number NCT01584648; COMBI-v, number NCT01597908. 617 patients were included in this analysis with a median follow-up of 20·0 months (range 0−48·0, IQR 10·1−24·8); 396 patients had progression events (ie, disease progression or death) and 290 patients had died. Median progression-free survival (11·1 months [95% CI 9·7−12·9]), median overall survival (25·6 months [23·1−34·3]), 1-year progression-free survival (48% [44–52]) and overall survival (74% [71–78]), and 2-year progression-free survival (30% [26–34]) and overall survival (53% [49–57]) were consistent with those in the individual trials. Patients with normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) concentration and fewer than three organ sites containing metastases (n=237) had the longest 1-year progression-free survival (68% [95% CI 62–74]) and overall survival (90% [87–94]) and 2-year progression-free survival (46% [40–54]) and overall survival (75% [70–81]), whereas patients with LDH concentration at least two times the upper limit of normal (n=70) had the shortest 1-year progression-free survival (8% [3–19]) and overall survival (40% [29–55]) and 2-year progression-free survival (2% [0–13]) and overall survival (7% [3–19]). Of patients with disease progression (n=379), survival after progression was longest in those with progression in baseline or new non-CNS lesions (n=205; median 10·0 months [95% CI 7·9−12·0]) and shortest in those with new CNS lesions or concurrent progression in baseline and new lesions (n=171; median 4·0 months [3·5−4·9]). Several patient and clinical characteristics at and after baseline are associated with outcomes with dabrafenib plus trametinib, and durable benefit is possible with targeted treatment in defined patient subsets. Novartis.

MP0250 is a designed ankyrin repeat protein that specifically inhibits both vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF‐A) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), aiming at potentiating cancer therapy by disrupting the tumour microenvironment. Encouraging results from a phase 1 trial of MP0250 in patients with solid tumours prompted further investigation in multiple myeloma (MM) as both MP0250 targets are reported to be drivers of MM pathogenesis. In this open‐label, single‐arm phase 1b/2 study (NCT03136653) in patients with proteasome inhibitor‐ and/or immunomodulatory drug‐relapsed or refractory MM, MP0250 was administered every 3 weeks with standard bortezomib/dexamethasone regimen. Thirty‐three patients received at least one dose of MP0250. The most frequent treatment‐related adverse events were arterial hypertension (58.1%), thrombocytopenia (32.3%), proteinuria (29.0%) and peripheral oedema (19.4%). Of the 28 patients evaluable for response (median age: 60 [range 44–75]), nine achieved at least partial response, corresponding to an overall response rate of 32.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.9%, 50.7%), with a median duration of response of 8 months (95% CI 5–NR). An additional three patients achieved minimal response and nine stable diseases as the best overall response. Overall median progression‐free survival was 4.2 months (95% CI 1.9–7.1). These findings are in line with the results of recent trials testing new agents on comparable patient cohorts and provide initial evidence of clinical benefit for patients with refractory/relapsed MM treated with MP0250 in combination with bortezomib/dexamethasone. Further clinical evaluation in the emerging MM treatment landscape would be required to confirm the clinical potential of MP0250.

BackgroundDose-limiting toxicity (DLT) due to systemic CD40 activation and peripheral target-mediated drug disposition are major challenges in clinical development of CD40 agonists. MP0317, a CD40-agonistic DARPin (designed ankyrin repeat protein), is exclusively active in the presence of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) expressed by cancer-associated fibroblasts in the tumor microenvironment (TME). This mode of action enables tumor-localized CD40 activation, while reducing systemic toxicity.MethodsThis ongoing Phase 1, multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation study aims to establish safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and preliminary antitumor activity of MP0317 monotherapy (NCT05098405). The dose-escalation scheme uses an adaptive Bayesian logistic regression model guided by the escalation with overdose control principle to determine the recommended dose. Eligible adult patients with selected advanced solid tumors (based on anticipated FAP expression) are enrolled into 9 sequentially-escalating dose cohorts of MP0317 (0.03–10 mg/kg), administered IV 3-weekly (Q3W) or 1-weekly (Q1W) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The study was approved by the Dutch and French Ethics Boards.ResultsAs of data cut-off (02 May 2023), 36 patients received ≥1 MP0317 dose across 8 cohorts, including 19 women (53%) and 17 men (47%). The median age at enrollment was 63 years (range 35–79) and patients received a median number of 3.5 prior treatments (range 1–13). Colorectal cancer was the most frequent tumor type (11 patients, 31%). One patient experienced a DLT (asymptomatic Grade 3 elevation of alanine and aspartate aminotransferases), at the highest planned dose of MP0317 (10 mg/kg Q3W). Grade 2 infusion-related reaction was the most frequently observed adverse reaction (7 patients, 19%), followed by Grade ≤2 fatigue, nausea and vomiting in 9, 6, and 4 patients, respectively. One patient achieved unconfirmed partial response, and stable disease was observed in 5 patients. Paired tumor biopsies confirmed colocalization of MP0317 with FAP and CD40. MP0317 detection in tumor biopsies was associated with an increase in abundance of antigen-presenting cells (dendritic cells, B cells and plasma cells) and IFNγ signature in the TME. Increases in CXCL10 serum levels post-MP0317 treatment support these findings.ConclusionsThese data of 36 patients, dosed across 8 dose levels (0.03–10 mg/kg, Q3W and Q1W schedules), confirmed a favorable safety profile of MP0317 monotherapy with limited systemic inflammation compared to other CD40 agonists. Analysis of paired tumor biopsies and peripheral biomarkers provided evidence of target occupancy and pharmacodynamic modulation in the TME, consistent with tumor-localized CD40 activation. These data support continued clinical evaluation of MP0317, including combination studies.Trial RegistrationThis study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05098405Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by the Dutch and French Ethics Boards.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was characterized by rapid evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants, affecting viral transmissibility, virulence, and response to vaccines/therapeutics. EMPATHY (NCT04828161), a phase 2 study, investigated the safety/efficacy of ensovibep, a multispecific designed ankyrin repeat protein (DARPin) with multivariant in vitro activity, in ambulatory patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. Nonhospitalized, symptomatic patients (N = 407) with COVID-19 were randomized to receive single-dose intravenous ensovibep (75, 225, or 600 mg) or placebo and followed until day 91. The primary endpoint was time-weighted change from baseline in log SARS-CoV-2 viral load through day 8. Secondary endpoints included proportion of patients with COVID-19-related hospitalizations, emergency room (ER) visits, and/or all-cause mortality to day 29; time to sustained clinical recovery to day 29; and safety to day 91. Ensovibep showed superiority versus placebo in reducing log SARS-CoV-2 viral load; treatment differences versus placebo in time-weighted change from baseline were -0.42 ( = .002), -0.33 ( = .014), and -0.59 ( < .001) for 75, 225, and 600 mg, respectively. Ensovibep-treated patients had fewer COVID-19-related hospitalizations, ER visits, and all-cause mortality (relative risk reduction: 78% [95% confidence interval, 16%-95%]) and a shorter median time to sustained clinical recovery than placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 44.3% versus 54.0% of patients in the ensovibep and placebo arms; grade 3 events were consistent with COVID-19 morbidity. Two deaths were reported with placebo and none with ensovibep. All 3 doses of ensovibep showed antiviral efficacy and clinical benefits versus placebo and an acceptable safety profile in nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Systemic fusarial infections have emerged as a significant cause of mortality in cancer patients. Yet, little is known about the management of these infections. The in vivo antifungal activity of amphotericin B in CFj mice with disseminated fusarial infections was studied. Two pathogenic strains of Fusarium solani were used. Intraperitoneal administration of amphotericin B in daily doses of 0.5,1, and 2 mg/kg for <10 days did not prolong survival of treated animals. Clearance of F. solani from kidneys was similar in mice treated with 1 mg/kg per day of amphotericin B and in untreated animals. These results are in agreement with the known in vitro and in vivo resistance of Fusarium species to amphotericin B.

Systemic fusarial infections have emerged as a significant cause of mortality in cancer patients. Yet, little is known about the management of these infections. The in vivo antifungal activity of amphotericin B in CF1 mice with disseminated fusarial infections was studied. Two pathogenic strains of Fusarium solani were used. Intraperitoneal administration of amphotericin B in daily doses of 0.5, 1, and 2 mg/kg for ⩽10 days did not prolong survival oftreated animals. Clearance of F. solani from kidneys was similar in mice treated with 1 mg/kg per day of amphotericin Band in untreated animals. These results are in agreement with the known in vitro and in vivo resistance of Fusarium species to amphotericin B.