Explore the vast range of titles available.

Previous studies suggest an impact of dexmedetomidine on cardiac electrophysiology. However, experimental data is sparse. Therefore, purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of dexmedetomidine on different experimental models of proarrhythmia. 50 rabbit hearts were explanted and retrogradely perfused. The first group (n = 12) was treated with dexmedetomidine in ascending concentrations (3, 5 and 10 µM). Dexmedetomidine did not substantially alter action potential duration (APD) but reduced spatial dispersion of repolarization (SDR) and rendered the action potentials rectangular, resulting in no proarrhythmia. In further 12 hearts, erythromycin (300 µM) was administered to simulate long-QT-syndrome-2 (LQT2). Additional treatment with dexmedetomidine reduced SDR, thereby suppressing torsade de pointes. In the third group (n = 14), 0.5 µM veratridine was added to reduce the repolarization reserve. Further administration of dexmedetomidine did not influence APD, SDR or the occurrence of arrhythmias. In the last group (n = 12), a combination of acetylcholine (1 µM) and isoproterenol (1 µM) was used to facilitate atrial fibrillation. Additional treatment with dexmedetomidine prolonged the atrial APD but did not reduce AF episodes. In this study, dexmedetomidine did not significantly alter cardiac repolarization duration and was not proarrhythmic in different models of ventricular and atrial arrhythmias. Of note, dexmedetomidine might be antiarrhythmic in acquired LQT2 by reducing SDR.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a combination of ranolazine with different selective inhibitors of the Na+/Ca2+-exchanger (NCX) in an established experimental model of atrial fibrillation (AF). Eighteen hearts of New Zealand white rabbits were retrogradely perfused. Atrial catheters were used to record monophasic action potentials (aPRR). Hearts were paced at three different cycle lengths. Thereby, atrial action potential durations (aAPD90), atrial effective refractory periods (aERP) and atrial post-repolarization refractoriness were obtained. Isoproterenol and acetylcholine were employed to increase the occurrence of AF. Thereafter, the hearts were assigned to two groups (n = 9 each group) and additionally perfused with a combination of 10 µM ranolazine and 1 µM of the selective NCX-inhibitor ORM-10103 (group A: Rano-ORM) or 10 µM ranolazine and 1 µM of another NCX-inhibitor, SEA0400 (group B: Rano-SEA). The infusion of Iso/ACh led to a shortening of aAPD90, aERP, aPRR and the occurrence of AF episodes was significantly increased. Additional perfusion with ranolazine and ORM-10103 (group A) significantly prolonged the refractory periods and aPRR and AF episodes were effectively reduced. In group B, Rano-SEA led to a slight decrease in aAPD90 while aERP and aPRR were prolonged. The occurrence of AF episodes was consecutively reduced. To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the effect of ranolazine combined with different selective NCX-inhibitors in an isolated whole-heart model of AF. Both combinations prolonged aERP and aPRR and thereby suppressed the induction of AF.

Background Ablation emerged as first line therapy in the treatment of various arrhythmias. Nevertheless, in older patients (pts), decision is often made pro drug treatment as more complications and less benefit are suspected. Hypothesis We hypothesized that different kind of ablations can be performed safely regardless of the pts age. Methods We enrolled all pts aged >80 years (yrs) who underwent ablation for three different arrhythmias (atrial flutter [AFL], atrioventricular nodal re‐entry tachycardia [AVNRT], ventricular tachycardia [VT]) between August 2002 and December 2018. Procedural data and outcome were compared with matched groups aged 60 to 80 years and 40 to 60 years, respectively. Periprocedural and in‐hospital complications were analyzed. Results The analysis included 1191 patients (397 pts per group: 63% AFL, 23% AVNRT, 14% VT) who underwent ablation. Acute success was high in all types of arrhythmias irrespective of age (>80, 60‐80, 40‐60 years: AFL 97%/98%/98%, AVNRT 97%/95%/97%, VT 82%/86%/93%). Rate of periprocedural complications were similar in all groups treated for AFL and AVNRT. For VT ablations significant differences were noted between pts > 80 or 60 to 80 years and those aged 40‐60 years (16.1%/14.3%/3.6%). Most complications were infections and groin haematoma. No strokes, iatrogenic atrioventricular blocks and deaths related to the ablation occurred. Conclusion Ablation appears safe in pts > 80 years. Success rates were comparable to matched younger cohorts. A significant difference was observed for VT patients.

Background: The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) has developed as a valuable alternative to transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) systems. However there are certain peculiarities which are immanent to the S-ICD and may limit its use. Besides oversensing the main issue is the missing option for antibradycardia pacing. To evaluate the actual need for pacing during follow-up and changes to transvenous ICD we analyzed our large tertiary centre registry and compared it with data from other large cohorts and trials. Methods and Results: We found out that in the 398 patients from our centre, there was a need for changing to a transvenous ICD in only 2 patients (0.5%) during a follow-up duration of almost 3 years. This rate was comparable to data obtained from other large data sets so that in the pooled analysis of almost 4000 patients the rate of bradycardia-associated complications was only 0.3%. Conclusions: The use of the S-ICD is safe in a variety of heart diseases and the need for antibradycardia stimulation is a very rare complication throughout many different large studies. Clinicians may take these results into account when opting for a certain ICD system and the S-ICD may be chosen more often also in elderly patients, in whom the risk for bradycardia is deemed higher.

Several case reports suggest QT prolongation leading to ventricular arrhythmias with fatal outcome after intoxication with the μ-opioid receptor agonist and anti-diarrheal agent loperamide. The number of cases of loperamide misuse are growing due to its potential stimulating effects. Loperamide intoxications can be treated by naloxone. However, previous reports described a further QT prolongation associated with naloxone administration. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of loperamide and naloxone on the cardiac electrophysiology in a sensitive whole-heart model. Twenty-six hearts of New Zealand White rabbits were retrogradely perfused in a modified Langendorff apparatus. Monophasic action potentials were recorded by endo- and epicardially positioned catheters. Hearts were stimulated at different cycle lengths, thereby obtaining action potential duration at 90% of repolarization (APD90) and QT intervals. Programmed ventricular stimulation was used to assess ventricular vulnerability. Fourteen hearts were perfused with ascending concentrations of loperamide (0.2 μM, 0.35 μM, and 0.5 μM) after obtaining baseline data. Another 12 hearts were treated with naloxone (0.1 μM, 0.5 μM, 2 μM). Loperamide led to a significant increase in QT interval, APD90, and ventricular tachycardia (VT) episodes. In contrast, naloxone led to a decrease in QT interval and APD90. Accordingly, the number of VT episodes was unaltered. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first experimental study that investigated the effects of loperamide and naloxone in a whole-heart model. Loperamide led to a significant increase in action potential duration and QT interval. Simultaneously, the number of ventricular tachycardias was significantly increased. In contrast, naloxone led to a shortening of the action potential duration without altering arrhythmia susceptibility.

Background: Decision-making in primary prevention is not always trivial and many clinical scenarios are not reflected in current guidelines. To help evaluate a patient’s individual risk, a new score to predict the benefit of an implantable defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention, the MADIT-ICD benefit score, has recently been proposed. The score tries to predict occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias and non-arrhythmic death based on data from four previous MADIT trials. We aimed at examining its usefulness in a large single-center register of S-ICD patients with various underlying cardiomyopathies. Methods and results: All S-ICD patients with a primary preventive indication for ICD implantation from our large single-center database were included in the analysis (n = 173). During a follow-up of 1227 ± 978 days, 27 patients developed sustained ventricular arrhythmias, while 6 patients died for non-arrhythmic reasons. There was a significant correlation for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) (n = 29, p = 0.04) to the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia. However, the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias could not sufficiently be predicted by the MADIT-ICD VT/VF score (p = 0.3) in patients with (n = 142, p = 0.19) as well as patients without structural heart disease (n = 31, p = 0.88) and patients with LV-EF < 35%. Of the risk factors included in the risk score calculation, only non-sustained ventricular tachycardias were significantly associated with sustained ventricular arrhythmias (p = 0.02). Of note, non-arrhythmic death could effectively be predicted by the proposed non-arrhythmic mortality score as part of the benefit score (p = 0.001, r = 0.3) also mainly driven by ICM patients. Age, diabetes mellitus, and a BMI < 23 kg/m2 were key predictors of non-arrhythmic death implemented in the score. Conclusion: The MADIT-ICD benefit score adds a new option to evaluate expected benefit of ICD implantation for primary prevention. In a large S-ICD cohort of primary prevention, the value of the score was limited to patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Future research should evaluate the performance of the score in different subgroups and compare it to other risk scores to assess its value for daily clinical practice.

Ivabradine has recently been demonstrated to have antiarrhythmic properties in atrial fibrillation. The aim of the present study was to assess the electrophysiologic profile of ivabradine in an experimental whole-heart model of long-QT-syndrome. In 12 isolated rabbit hearts long-QT-2-syndrome (LQT2) was simulated by infusion of d,l-sotalol (100 µM). 12 rabbit hearts were treated with veratridine (0.5 µM) to mimic long-QT-3-syndrome (LQT3). Sotalol induced a significant prolongation of QT-interval (+ 40 ms, p < 0.01) and action potential duration (APD, + 20 ms, p < 0.01). Similar results were obtained in veratridine-treated hearts (QT-interval: +52 ms, p < 0.01; APD: + 41 ms, p < 0.01). Of note, both sotalol (+ 26 ms, p < 0.01) and veratridine (+ 42 ms, p < 0.01) significantly increased spatial dispersion of repolarisation. Additional infusion of ivabradine (5 µM) did not change these parameters in sotalol-pretreated hearts but resulted in a further significant increase of QT-interval (+ 26 ms, p < 0.05) and APD (+ 49 ms, p < 0.05) in veratridine-treated hearts. Lowering of potassium concentration in bradycardic AV-blocked hearts resulted in the occurrence of early afterdepolarizations (EAD) or polymorphic ventricular tachycardias (VT) resembling torsade de pointes in 6 of 12 sotalol-treated hearts (56 episodes) and 6 of 12 veratridine-treated hearts (73 episodes). Additional infusion of ivabradine increased occurrence of polymorphic VT. Ivabradine treatment resulted in occurrence of EAD and polymorphic VT in 9 of 12 sotalol-treated hearts (212 episodes), and 8 of 12 veratridine-treated hearts (155 episodes). Treatment with ivabradine in experimental models of LQT2 and LQT3 increases proarrhythmia. A distinct interaction with potassium currents most likely represents a major underlying mechanism. These results imply that ivabradine should be employed with caution in the presence of QT-prolongation.

1. Introduction: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an established procedure used to achieve rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AF). In obese patients (pts), in whom AF occurs more frequently, a reduced effectiveness of PVI has been observed. Therefore, this study’s aim was to compare the long-term efficacy of PVI between obese and non-obese patients. 2. Methods: We enrolled 111 consecutive pts with a body mass index (BMI) of >30 kg/m2 undergoing PVI from our large registry. Procedural data and outcomes were compared with a matched group of 115 non-obese PVI pts and the long-term outcomes were analyzed. 3. Results: Overall follow-up duration was 314 patient-years in the obese and 378 patient-years in the non-obese group. The follow-up rate was 71% in the obese and 76% in the non-obese group. In both groups, their AF-characteristics did not differ significantly, while known risk factors were significantly more prevalent in the obese group. Procedural characteristics were similar in both groups. During follow-up, the obese pts demonstrated significant weight loss compared to the non-obese pts, while at the same time, the overall recurrence rate during follow-up did not differ significantly between both groups (obese: 39.2% and non-obese: 43.7%). PVI related and long-term complications were comparable between both groups. In the univariate analysis, obesity was not found to be associated with an increased AF recurrence risk. 4. Conclusion: These real-life data demonstrate that obese pts may not show higher AF recurrence rates after PVI compared to pts with normal body weight. Furthermore, PVI was found to be safe and effective in obese patients; thus, a BMI alone may not be a criterion for refusal of PVI.

We had the objective to determine the impact of clinical parameters and anticoagulation status on cerebral microembolic signals (MES) during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF). Thromboembolism and stroke are the most feared complications of PVI. MES can help to evaluate embolic burden. It is unknown whether clinical parameters have an impact on embolic risk during PVI. In this retrospective analysis we investigated the impact of clinical parameters, including the CHADS2- and CHA2DS2-VASc-score, pulmonary vein variants and echocardiographic parameters on MES rates in patients that underwent PVI using three different ablation approaches (radiofrequency ablation (iRF), pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC) with deactivated electrode pair 1 or 5 (PVAC-red) or PVAC without deactivation (PVAC-all). 118 AF patients (61±12 years) were included between 2011 and 2013 (Median: 489 MES during PVI). Patients were more likely to have more MES (within 4th quartile) with the PVAC-all approach (60.7% vs. 25.0% (iRF) vs. 14.3% (PVAC-red) respectively (p<0.001). Patients with oral anticoagulation (OAC) pre-ablation were more likely to have lower MES-counts (1st-3rd quartile); (65.6% vs. 35.7%; p = 0.005). Additionally, patients with lower MES counts (1st-3rd quartile) had significantly higher INR values than those in the 4th quartile (1.78 vs. 1.09; p = 0.029). 2 patients developed a potentially thromboembolic event during the procedure. Clinical predictors of cerebral emboli and stroke do not correlate with cerebral embolic burden during PVI. Pre-ablation OAC and increased INR values correlate with decreased MES-rates. Therefore, it might be beneficial to perform PVI with pre-ablation anticoagulation even in low risk patients.

Atrial fibrillation and other atrial tachyarrhythmias are increasing with age and concomitant morbidity. First options in symptomatic patients are drug treatment and catheter ablation. Nevertheless, a considerable number of patients suffer from refractory atrial tachyarrhythmias despite treatment. Atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) may be helpful in many of these patients. Therefore, we investigated AVNA patients with a long-term follow-up. We enrolled 82 patients with a follow-up longer than 1 year receiving AVNA for drug- and ablation-resistant atrial tachyarrhythmias (AA) in a retrospective manner. Mean follow-up duration was 48 ± 24 months. 50% of the patients initially received AVNA to optimize biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy, the other 50% because of refractory symptomatic tachyarrhythmias. Persistent AV block was achieved in every patient. Symptom relief and patient satisfaction were high during follow-up. Due to system upgrades there were 63% of patients with a biventricular system during follow-up. In these patients, left-ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF) increased by 7% (42–49%) after ablation. AVNA is effective in increasing biventricular pacing as well as for symptom relief in patients with refractory atrial tachyarrhythmias. AVNA should be considered as a valuable option in patients with refractory atrial tachyarrhythmias lacking other treatment options.