Explore the vast range of titles available.

In this study, more than 2000 woman in sub-Saharan Africa at high risk for HIV infection were assigned to receive daily tenofovir plus emtricitabine or placebo as an HIV-prevention strategy. No efficacy was observed, but rates of side effects were higher in the treated group. Recent studies have shown that daily oral preexposure prophylaxis with 300 mg of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), an oral prodrug of tenofovir, alone or in combination with 200 mg of emtricitabine (FTC) (TDF–FTC [Truvada], Gilead Sciences) can reduce the risk of sexually acquired human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in men and women. 1 – 3 Consequently, an advisory committee of the Food and Drug Administration recently recommended that the label indications for Truvada be changed to include HIV prevention. 4 We report the primary results of the Preexposure Prophylaxis Trial for HIV Prevention among African Women (FEM-PrEP), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of . . .

The phase 3 ATLAS and FLAIR studies demonstrated that maintenance with Long-Acting (LA) intramuscular cabotegravir and rilpivirine is non-inferior in efficacy to current antiretroviral (CAR) oral therapy. Both studies utilized Patient-Reported Outcome instruments to measure treatment satisfaction (HIVTSQ) and acceptance (ACCEPT general domain), health status (SF-12), injection tolerability/acceptance (PIN), and treatment preference. In pooled analyses, LA-treated patients (n = 591) demonstrated greater mean improvements from baseline than the CAR group (n = 591) in treatment satisfaction (Week 44, + 3.9 vs. +0.5 HIVTSQs-points; p < 0.001) and acceptance (Week 48, +8.8 vs. +2.0 ACCEPT-points; p < 0.001). The acceptability of injection site reactions (PIN) significantly improved from week 5 (2.10 points) to week 48 (1.62 points; p < 0.001). In both studies, ≥ 97% of LA group participants with recorded data preferred LA treatment compared with prior oral therapy. These results further support the potential of a monthly injectable option for people living with HIV seeking an alternative to daily oral treatment.

GSK3532795 (formerly known as BMS-955176) is a second-generation maturation inhibitor targeting a specific Gag cleavage site between capsid p24 and spacer peptide 1 of HIV-1. Study 205891 (previously AI468038) investigated the efficacy, safety, and dose response of GSK3532795 in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected participants. Study 205891 (NCT02415595) was a Phase IIb, randomized, active-controlled, double-blind, international trial. Participants were randomized 1:1:1:1 to one of three GSK3532795 arms at doses 60 mg, 120 mg or 180 mg once daily (QD), or to efavirenz (EFV) at 600 mg QD, each in combination with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) (300/200 mg QD). Primary endpoint was proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at Week 24. Between May 2015 and May 2016, 206 participants received treatment. At Week 24, 76-83% participants receiving GSK3532795 and 77% receiving EFV achieved HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL. Fifteen participants receiving GSK3532795 and one receiving EFV met resistance testing criteria; 10/15 receiving GSK3532795 had emergent substitutions at reverse transcriptase positions M184, and one at position K65, while the participant receiving EFV did not have any nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)/non-NRTI mutations. EFV, relative to GSK3532795, had more serious adverse events (9% versus 5%) and adverse events leading to discontinuation (17% versus 5%). However, 3-4-fold higher rates of gastrointestinal adverse events were observed with GSK3532795 relative to EFV. GSK3532795 combined with TDF/FTC is efficacious with 24 weeks of therapy. However, GSK3532795 showed a higher rate of gastrointestinal intolerability and treatment-emergent resistance to the NRTI backbone relative to EFV. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02415595.

BackgroundEvaluating long-term efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of long-acting cabotegravir + rilpivirine (CAB+RPV LA) in sub-Saharan African populations is important because of the region’s unique demographics and antiretroviral therapy resistance patterns.ObjectivesTo describe the 96-week efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of CAB+RPV LA in South African participants from the pooled FLAIR and ATLAS-2M Phase 3/3b randomised studies.MethodPrimary endpoint: proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels ≥ 50 copies/mL at Week 96. Secondary endpoints: proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels < 50 copies/mL, confirmed virological failure (CVF; two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA ≥ 200 copies/mL), adverse events and pharmacokinetics.ResultsSixty-six participants were included, (CAB+RPV LA, n = 49; current oral antiretroviral regimen [CAR], n = 17). Forty-five (92%) on CAB+RPV LA and 15 (88%) on CAR maintained HIV-1 RNA levels < 50 copies/mL. At Week 96, two participants, one in each arm, had CVF. Ninety per cent on CAB+RPV LA and 76% on CAR of participants experienced an adverse event; six (12%) of which were drug-related (CAB+RPV LA: n = 6). Injection-site reactions were common (78% [Grade 1: 80%; Grade 2: 20%]). CAB and RPV trough plasma concentrations remained above respective in vitro protein-adjusted 90% inhibitory concentrations following all doses.ConclusionThis subgroup analysis of South African participants demonstrated durable efficacy, acceptable safety profile and pharmacokinetics of injectable CAB+RPV LA up to 96 weeks, consistent with long-term data from other regions and studies.

Simplified treatment regimens for HIV-1 may have advantages. In this open-label, randomized, controlled trial, patients with HIV-1 infection who had not previously received antiretroviral therapy were given oral induction therapy, then treated with either monthly injections of long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine or standard treatment. At 48 weeks, similar viral suppression was observed with the two regimens.

Oral emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) has been evaluated as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We describe the accuracy of self-reported adherence to FTC/TDF and pill counts when compared to drug concentrations in the FEM-PrEP trial. Using drug concentrations of plasma tenofovir (TFV) and intracellular tenofovir diphosphate (TFVdp) among a random sub-sample of 150 participants assigned to FTC/TDF, we estimated the positive predictive value (PPV) of four adherence measures. We also assessed factors associated with misreporting of adherence using multiple drug-concentration thresholds and explored pill use and misreporting using semi-structured interviews (SSIs). Reporting use of ≥1 pill in the previous 7 days had the highest PPV, while pill-count data consistent with missing ≤1 day had the lowest PPV. However, all four measures demonstrated poor PPV. Reported use of oral contraceptives (OR 2.26; p  = 0.014) and weeks of time in the study (OR 1.02; p  < 0.001) were significantly associated with misreporting adherence. Although most SSI participants said they did not misreport adherence, participant-dependent adherence measures were clearly unreliable in the FEM-PrEP trial. Pharmacokinetic monitoring remains the measure of choice until more reliable participant-dependent measures are developed.

GSK3532795 (formerly known as BMS-955176) is a second-generation maturation inhibitor targeting a specific Gag cleavage site between capsid p24 and spacer peptide 1 of HIV-1. Study 205891 (previously AI468038) investigated the efficacy, safety, and dose response of GSK3532795 in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected participants. Study 205891 (NCT02415595) was a Phase IIb, randomized, active-controlled, double-blind, international trial. Participants were randomized 1:1:1:1 to one of three GSK3532795 arms at doses 60 mg, 120 mg or 180 mg once daily (QD), or to efavirenz (EFV) at 600 mg QD, each in combination with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) (300/200 mg QD). Primary endpoint was proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at Week 24. Between May 2015 and May 2016, 206 participants received treatment. At Week 24, 76-83% participants receiving GSK3532795 and 77% receiving EFV achieved HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL. Fifteen participants receiving GSK3532795 and one receiving EFV met resistance testing criteria; 10/15 receiving GSK3532795 had emergent substitutions at reverse transcriptase positions M184, and one at position K65, while the participant receiving EFV did not have any nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)/non-NRTI mutations. EFV, relative to GSK3532795, had more serious adverse events (9% versus 5%) and adverse events leading to discontinuation (17% versus 5%). However, 3-4-fold higher rates of gastrointestinal adverse events were observed with GSK3532795 relative to EFV. GSK3532795 combined with TDF/FTC is efficacious with 24 weeks of therapy. However, GSK3532795 showed a higher rate of gastrointestinal intolerability and treatment-emergent resistance to the NRTI backbone relative to EFV.

Biomedical HIV-prevention research is most likely to succeed when researchers actively engage with community stakeholders. To this effect, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS and the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition developed good participatory practice guidelines for biomedical HIV-prevention trials in 2007 and updated them in 2011. The Preexposure Prophylaxis Trial for HIV Prevention among African Women (FEM-PrEP) clinical trial, testing once-daily Truvada as preexposure prophylaxis among women at higher risk of HIV in Kenya, South Africa, and Tanzania, included a community program to engage with local stakeholders. Following the trial, we revisited the community program to situate activities in the context of the 2011 guidelines. In the paper, we describe implementation of the six guidelines relevant to local stakeholder engagement--stakeholder advisory mechanisms, stakeholder engagement plan, stakeholder education plan, communications plan, issues management plan, trial closure, and results dissemination--in light of on-the-ground realities of the trial. We then identify two cross-cutting themes from our considerations: (1) stakeholder education beyond the good participatory practice recommendation to increase research literacy about the specific trial is needed; education efforts should also communicate a base of information on HIV transmission and prevention; and (2) anticipatory preparation is useful in communications planning, issues management, and trial closure and results dissemination, and may contribute to successful conduct of the trial; in FEM-PrEP, this was possible through integration of the community program with social, behavioral, and clinical research. Keywords: stakeholder engagement, community engagement, community involvement, HIV-prevention trials, good participatory practice guidelines, FEM-PrEP