Explore the vast range of titles available.

From 1980 to 2014, the number of incarcerated persons in the United States increased from 501 886 to 2 224 400—an increase of 343%. In 2014, about 1 in 110 adults were incarcerated in prisons and jails, and an additional 4.7 million adults were on probation or parole. In the same year, 636 346 persons were released from state and federal prisons, and an estimated 11 million persons cycled through local jails. More than 95% of incarcerated persons eventually return to their communities. Given the high rates of incarceration and subsequent release to the community, a large segment of the US population is involved in the criminal justice system. In this article, the terms “criminal justice involvement” and “justice-involved” refer to persons who have had contact with the criminal justice system in 1 or more of the following capacities: arrest, booking, charging, sentencing, incarceration in jail or prison, probation, or parole. This commentary examines justice involvement measures in federally funded, national population-based surveys. Building on a study that examined the absence of data on incarceration in 36 studies included in the Society of General Internal Medicine database on general health, we examined the available national population-based studies financed by the federal government that examine health outcomes. We provide an overview of the national population-based surveys that were selected for inclusion in this commentary and describe items in each survey that pertain to justice involvement and health among persons who have a history of incarceration and their family members. Our commentary further expands on the previous study by describing what studies have been conducted using these data sets and which questions could be answered given the domains that are included. We then summarize research questions that have recently been answered using these surveys. Finally, we outline future directions and offer recommendations for how national population-based surveys could best be used to understand the health status and health needs of the justice-involved population.

The burden of HIV/AIDS and other transmissible diseases is higher in prison and jail settings than in the non-incarcerated communities that surround them. In this comprehensive review, we discuss available literature on the topic of clinical management of people infected with HIV, hepatitis B and C viruses, and tuberculosis in incarcerated settings in addition to co-occurrence of one or more of these infections. Methods such as screening practices and provision of treatment during detainment periods are reviewed to identify the effect of community-based treatment when returning inmates into the general population. Where data are available, we describe differences in the provision of medical care in the prison and jail settings of low-income and middle-income countries compared with high-income countries. Structural barriers impede the optimal delivery of clinical care for prisoners, and substance use, mental illness, and infectious disease further complicate the delivery of care. For prison health care to reach the standards of community-based health care, political will and financial investment are required from governmental, medical, and humanitarian organisations worldwide. In this review, we highlight challenges, gaps in knowledge, and priorities for future research to improve health-care in institutions for prisoners.

Objectives The escalating overdose crisis in the United States points to the urgent need for new and novel data tools. Overdose data tools are growing in popularity but still face timely delays in surveillance data availability, lack of completeness, and wide variability in quality by region. As such, we need innovative tools to identify and prioritize emerging and high-need areas. Forecasting offers one such solution. Machine learning methods leverage numerous datasets that could be used to predict future vulnerability to overdose at the regional, town, and even neighborhood levels. This study aimed to understand the multi-level factors affecting the early stages of implementation for an overdose forecasting dashboard. This dashboard was developed with and for statewide harm reduction providers to increase data-driven response and resource distribution at the neighborhood level. Methods As part of PROVIDENT (Preventing OVerdose using Information and Data from the EnvironmeNT), a randomized, statewide community trial, we conducted an implementation study where we facilitated three focus groups with harm reduction organizations enrolled in the larger trial. Focus group participants held titles such as peer outreach workers, case managers, and program coordinators/managers. We employed the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) Framework to guide our analysis. This framework offers a multi-level, four-phase analysis unique to implementation within a human services environment to assess the exploration and preparation phases that influenced the early launch of the intervention. Results Multiple themes centering on organizational culture and resources emerged, including limited staff capacity for new interventions and repeated exposure to stress and trauma, which could limit intervention uptake. Community-level themes included the burden of data collection for program funding and statewide efforts to build stronger networks for data collection and dashboarding and data-driven resource allocation. Discussion Using an implementation framework within the larger study allowed us to identify multi-level and contextual factors affecting the early implementation of a forecasting dashboard within the PROVIDENT community trial. Additional investments to build organizational and community capacity may be required to create the optimal implementation setting and integration of forecasting tools.

Background As in much of the United States, there have been significant increases in overdose deaths among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic/Latinx populations in Rhode Island over the past decade. Given the shifting dynamics of the overdose epidemic, there is an urgent need for focused interventions that address the specific needs of diverse communities. This study explores differences in drug use patterns, harm reduction behaviors and types and barriers to treatment by race and ethnicity. Methods This study utilized baseline data from the Rhode Island Prescription and Illicit Drug Study (RAPIDS). We assessed sociodemographic characteristics, drug use patterns, harm reduction practices, treatment type, and barriers to treatment in a cross-sectional analysis of people who use drugs (PWUD), stratified by race and ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic other race, and Hispanic). Chi-square tests of independence and ANOVA tests were used to identify statistically significant differences by race and ethnicity. Results Among 509 participants, the median age was 43, and the majority were men (64%). Non-Hispanic Black participants reported significantly less regular use of unregulated opioids, such as heroin (10%) and fentanyl (12%), as compared to non-Hispanic white participants (39% and 33%, respectively). Non-Hispanic Black participants reported significantly less experience responding to overdoses: only 39% had ever administered naloxone and 34% had ever performed rescue breathing, as compared to 67% and 57% among non-Hispanic white participants, respectively. Despite significant differences in drug use patterns, there were few differences in harm reduction practices by race and ethnicity. Current treatment enrollment was highest among those who were non-Hispanic white (38%) and lowest among those who were non-Hispanic Black (7%). Conclusions These findings suggest that there are differences in overdose response experience and treatment exposure between non-Hispanic Black PWUD and those belonging to other racial and ethnic groups, indicating a need for enhanced investment in overdose response education, naloxone distribution and treatment access for non-Hispanic Black PWUD.

Background Previous research has documented differing drug use patterns and risk behaviors by gender identity and sex at birth, although variations in harm reduction practices by these characteristics have not yet been fully assessed. Methods We utilized data from the Rhode Island Prescription and Illicit Drug Study (RAPIDS), which enrolled adults who used drugs from 2020 to 2023. Participants were analyzed based on gender identity: men, women, and other (including those identifying as non-binary or something else). Participants reported which harm reduction practices (e.g., use fentanyl test strips, keep naloxone nearby) they typically engaged in to avoid accidental overdose. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify subgroups of harm reduction practice typologies, and a correlation matrix was generated to understand dyads of typical self-reported harm reduction practices. Results Among 503 eligible participants, 64% were men, 34% were women, and 2% were non-binary or something else ( n  = 9). Harm reduction practices were comparable between men and women, although men were less likely to keep naloxone nearby ( p  = 0.02). LCA identified three subgroups of harm reduction practice typologies (no/low, moderate, and high utilization). Group membership in latent classes did not vary by gender identity. However, those belonging to the no/low utilization subgroup were significantly more likely to have ever been incarcerated ( p  = 0.03) and to be single ( p  < 0.01). Those belonging to the high utilization group were significantly more likely to have ever witnessed an overdose, performed rescue breathing, and administered naloxone (all p  < 0.001). Correlations showed several pairwise relationships, with ‘use fentanyl test strips’ and ‘keeping naloxone nearby’ being positively and significantly correlated ( r  = 0.33, p  < 0.05). Conclusions We found that harm reduction practices and group membership in latent classes were largely comparable between men and women; however, men who use drugs are significantly less likely to keep naloxone nearby. Gender-attentive strategies to increase naloxone carriage and usage among men and enhanced outreach to persons characterized by no or low harm reduction practice utilization, including people who are single and those with a history of incarceration, may be warranted to mitigate overdose risk.

BackgroundFentanyl and related compounds have recently saturated the illicit drug supply in the United States, leading to unprecedented rates of fatal overdose. Individuals who are incarcerated are particularly vulnerable, as the burden of opioid use disorder is disproportionately higher in this population, and tolerance generally decreases during incarceration.MethodsWe conduct a systematic search for publications about fentanyl overdoses during incarceration in PubMed and PsycINFO, as well as lay press articles in Google, from January 1, 2013 through March 30th, 2021.ResultsNot a single fentanyl overdose was identified in the medical literature, but 90 overdose events, comprising of 76 fatal and 103 nonfatal fentanyl overdoses, were identified in the lay press. Among the 179 overdoses, 138 occurred in jails and 41 occurred in prisons, across the country.ConclusionsFentanyl-related overdoses are occurring in correctional facilities with unknown but likely increasing frequency. In addition to the need for improved detection and reporting, immediate efforts to 1) increase understanding of the risks of fentanyl and how to prevent and treat overdose among correctional staff and residents, 2) ensure widespread prompt availability of naloxone and 3) expand the availability of medications to treat opioid use disorder for people who are incarcerated will save lives.

Background The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected structurally vulnerable populations including people who use drugs (PWUD). Increased overdose risk behaviors among PWUD during the pandemic have been documented, with research underscoring the role of influencing factors such as isolation and job loss in these behaviors. Here, we use qualitative methods to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and pandemic-related response measures on drug use behaviors in a sample of PWUD in Rhode Island. Using a social-ecological framework, we highlight the nested, interactive levels of the pandemic’s influence on increased overdose risk behaviors. Methods From July to October 2021, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 PWUD who self-reported any increase in behaviors associated with overdose risk (e.g., increased use, change in drug type and/or more solitary drug use) relative to before the pandemic. Thematic analysis was conducted using a codebook with salient themes identified from interview guides and those that emerged through close reading of transcribed interviews. Guided by a social-ecological framework, themes were grouped into individual, network, institutional, and policy-level influences of the pandemic on drug use behaviors. Results Individual-level influences on increased overdose risk behaviors included self-reported anxiety and depression, isolation and loneliness, and boredom. Network-level influences included changes in local drug supply and changes in social network composition specific to housing. At the institutional level, drug use patterns were influenced by reduced access to harm reduction or treatment services. At the policy level, increased overdose risk behaviors were related to financial changes, job loss, and business closures. All participants identified factors influencing overdose risk behaviors that corresponded to several nested social-ecological levels. Conclusions Participants identified multi-level influences of the COVID-19 pandemic and pandemic-related response measures on their drug use behavior patterns and overdose risk. These findings suggest that effective harm reduction during large-scale crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, must address several levels of influence concurrently.

Background Overdose prevention centers (OPCs) are being implemented in the United States as a strategy to reduce drug-related mortality and morbidity. Previous studies have suggested that people who use drugs (PWUD) with a history of criminal legal system (CLS) involvement (e.g. current probation/parole) are at greater risk of overdose but may also encounter significant barriers to OPC use. The objective of this study was to explore the association between willingness to use an OPC and probation/parole status in a sample of PWUD in Rhode Island. Methods This study utilized data from the Rhode Island Prescription and Illicit Drug Study, which enrolled adult PWUD from August 2020 to February 2023. We used Pearson’s chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests to assess bivariate associations between willingness to use an OPC and probation/parole status (current/previous/never), as well as other sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics. In multivariable Poisson analyses, we examined the association between willingness to use an OPC and probation/parole status, adjusting for key sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics. Results Among 482 study participants, 67% were male, 56% identified as white, 20% identified as Hispanic/Latine, and the median age was 43 (IQR 35–53). Nearly a quarter (24%) had never been on probation/parole, 44% were not currently on probation/parole but had a lifetime history of probation and parole, and 32% were currently on probation/parole. Most participants (71%) reported willingness to use an OPC, and in both bivariate and multivariable analyses, willingness to use an OPC did not vary by probation/parole status. Crack cocaine use and lifetime non-fatal overdose were associated with greater willingness to use an OPC (all p  < 0.05). Conclusions These data demonstrate high willingness to use OPC among PWUD in Rhode Island regardless of CLS-involvement. As OPCs begin to be implemented in Rhode Island, it will be imperative to engage people with CLS-involvement and to ensure access to the OPC and protection against re-incarceration due to potential barriers, such as police surveillance of OPCs.

Background Fentanyl is increasingly pervasive in the unregulated drug supply and is a driver of drug overdose deaths in the United States. The aims of this study were to characterize and identify correlates of fentanyl preference among people who use drugs (PWUD) in Rhode Island (RI). Methods Using bivariate analysis, we examined associations between fentanyl preference and sociodemographic and psychosocial characteristics at baseline among participants enrolled in the RI Prescription Drug and Illicit Drug Study from August 2020-February 2023. Fentanyl preference was operationalized based on responses to a five-point Likert scale: “I prefer using fentanyl or drugs that have fentanyl in them.” Participants who responded that they “strongly disagree,” “disagree,” or were “neutral” with respect to this statement were classified as not preferring fentanyl, whereas participants who responded that they “agree” or “strongly agree” were classified as preferring fentanyl. Results Among 506 PWUD eligible for inclusion in this analysis, 15% expressed a preference for fentanyl or drugs containing fentanyl as their drug of choice. In bivariate analyses, preference for fentanyl was positively associated with younger age, white race, lifetime history of overdose, history of injection drug use, past month enrollment in a substance use treatment program, past month treatment with medications for opioid use disorder, and preferences for heroin and crystal methamphetamine (all p  < 0.05). Descriptive data yielded further insight into reasons for fentanyl preference, the predominant having to do with perceived effects of the drug and desire to avoid withdrawal symptoms. Conclusions Only a relatively small subset of study participants preferred drugs containing fentanyl. Given the increased prevalence of fentanyl contamination across substances within the unregulated drug market, the result for PWUD is increasingly less agency with respect to choice of drug; for example, people may be forced to use fentanyl due to restricted supply and the need to mitigate withdrawal symptoms, or may be using fentanyl without intending to do so. Novel and more effective interventions for PWUD, including increased access to age-appropriate harm reduction programs such as fentanyl test strips and overdose prevention centers, are needed to mitigate fentanyl-related harms.