Explore the vast range of titles available.

Mutual interactions between the diaphragm and lung transplantation (LTx) are known to exist. Before LTx, many factors can exert notable impact on the diaphragmatic function, such as the underlying respiratory disease, the comorbidities, and the chronic treatments of the patient. In the post-LTx setting, even the surgical procedure itself can cause a stressful trauma to the diaphragm, potentially leading to morphological and functional alterations. Conversely, the diaphragm can significantly influence various aspects of the LTx process, ranging from graft-to-chest cavity size matching to the long-term postoperative respiratory performance of the recipient. Despite this, there are still no standard criteria for evaluating, defining, and managing diaphragmatic dysfunction in the context of LTx to date. This deficiency hampers the accurate assessment of those factors which affect the diaphragm and its reciprocal influence on LTx outcomes. The objective of this narrative review is to delve into the complex role the diaphragm plays in the different stages of LTx and into the modifications of this muscle following surgery.

Respiratory infections pose a significant threat to the success of solid organ transplantation, and the diagnosis and management of these infections are challenging. The current narrative review addressed some of these challenges, based on evidence from the literature published in the last 20 years. Specifically, we focused our attention on (i) the obstacles to an etiologic diagnosis of respiratory infections among solid organ transplant recipients, (ii) the management of bacterial respiratory infections in an era characterized by increased antimicrobial resistance, and (iii) the development of antimicrobial stewardship programs dedicated to solid organ transplant recipients.

Lung transplant (LUTX) candidates have subclinical right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, which has not yet been assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE)-derived RV free-wall longitudinal strain (RVFWLS). To evaluate the prevalence of RV dysfunction by RVFWLS and its relationship with conventional RV echocardiographic indexes in LUTX candidates. In a single-center prospective observational cohort study, from January 2021 to March 2023 consecutive LUTX candidates underwent cardiac catheterization, radionuclide ventriculography, standard and STE. The diagnostic accuracy of RV ejection fraction by ventriculography (RVEF), tricuspid annular plane excursion (TAPSE), fractional area change (FAC), tricuspid peak annulus systolic velocity (S') versus RVFWS were computed. Thirty-four patients (female, 41%) with a mean age of 48 [36-59] years old enlisted for pulmonary fibrosis (35%) and cystic fibrosis (30%) were included. At cardiac catheterization, only 7 (23%) had pulmonary hypertension. Around 15-25% presented right heart enlargement. Tricuspid regurgitation was present in 20 (60%) of the patients. Median RVFWLS was -20.1% [-22.5%--17%], being impaired (> -20%) in 16 (47%) of the patients. RVFWLS identified the highest percentage (47%) of RV dysfunction, compared to TAPSE (32%), S' (27%), FAC (26%), and ventriculography (15%), which had very low sensitivity for detecting RV dysfunction compared to RVFWLS. In patients enlisted for LUTX, RV dysfunction assessed by STE-derived RVFWLS is highly prevalent. STE can detect RV dysfunction better than standard two-dimensional echocardiography and ventriculography. Further studies are urgently needed to define the clinical implications and the prognostic value of RV dysfunction measured with RVFWLS.

Lung transplantation offers a lifesaving option for patients with end-stage lung disease, but it is marred by a high risk of post-transplant infections, particularly involving multidrug-resistant bacteria, Cytomegalovirus, and fungal pathogens. This elevated infection rate, the highest among solid organ transplants, poses a significant challenge for clinicians, particularly within the first year post-transplantation, where infections are the leading cause of mortality. The direct exposure of lung allografts to the external environment exacerbates this vulnerability leading to constant immune stimulation and consequently to an elevated risk of triggering alloimmune responses to the lung allograft. The necessity of prolonged immunosuppression to prevent allograft rejection further complicates patient management by increasing susceptibility to infections and neoplasms, and complicating the differentiation between rejection and infection, which require diametrically opposed management strategies. This review explores the intricate balance between preventing allograft rejection and managing the heightened infection risk in lung transplant recipients.

The acceptable duration of donor warm ischemia time (DWIT) after cardiocirculatory death (DCD) is still debated. We analyzed the biomolecular profile and function during ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) of DCD lungs and their correlation with lung transplantation (LuTx) outcomes. Donor data, procurement times, recipient outcomes, and graft function up to 1 year after LuTx were collected. During EVLP, the parameters of graft function and metabolism, perfusate samples to quantify inflammation, glycocalyx breakdown products, coagulation, and endothelial activation markers were obtained. Data were compared to a cohort of extended-criteria donors after brain death (EC-DBD). Eight DBD and seven DCD grafts transplanted after EVLP were analyzed. DCD’s DWIT was 201 [188;247] minutes. Donors differed only regarding the duration of mechanical ventilation that was longer in the EC-DBD group. No difference was observed in lung graft function during EVLP. At reperfusion, “wash-out” of inflammatory cells and microthrombi was predominant in DCD grafts. Perfusate biomolecular profile demonstrated marked endothelial activation, characterized by the presence of inflammatory mediators and glycocalyx breakdown products both in DCD and EC-DBD grafts. Early graft function after LuTx was similar between DCD and EC-DBD. DCD lungs exposed to prolonged DWIT represent a potential resource for donation if properly preserved and evaluated.

The gold standard for histological acute cellular rejection diagnosis is transbronchial forceps biopsy (FB), but in recent years, transbronchial cryobiopsy (CB) has been increasingly used. This study aims to compare the diagnostic rate and safety of FBs and CBs performed in two different periods. We retrospectively reviewed our case history for the two biopsy procedures: 251 FBs (223 for surveillance purposes and 28 for clinical indication) and 218 consecutive CBs (159 for surveillance purposes and 59 for clinical indication). All biopsies were scored according to the ISHLT criteria. Diagnostic yield was higher in the CB group for all the parameters considered: a grade of acute rejection (AR) was detected in 95.0% vs. 84.5% in the CB vs. FB groups (p < 0.001). The diagnostic rate of airway inflammation was 65.1% vs. 51.8% (p = 0.005), and 89.0% vs. 64.9% (p < 0.001) for chronic rejection. Pneumothorax requiring chest drainage occurred in 4% of the CB group and 3% of the FB group. Moderate and severe bleeding complicated CB and FB procedures in seven (3%) and three cases (1%), respectively. Transbronchial cryobiopsies improved the diagnostic yield in the monitoring of the lung allograft. The complication rate did not increase significantly in CBs vs. FBs.

To describe the symptoms and clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). We carried out a prospective multicentre cohort study based on 32 CF centres and 6597 patients. Centres were contacted to collect baseline and follow-up data of patients who reported symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 or who had contact with a positive/suspected case between the end of February and July 2020. Symptoms and clinical course of the infection were compared between patients who tested positive by molecular testing (cases) and those who tested negative (controls). Thirty patients were reported from the centres, 16 of them tested positive and 14 tested negative. No differences in symptoms and outcome of the disease were observed between groups. Fever, cough, asthenia and dyspnea were the most frequently reported symptoms. Eight cases (50%) were hospitalized but none required ICU admission. Two adults with a history of lung transplant required non-invasive ventilation, none required ICU admission and all patients fully recovered without short-term sequelae. The course of SARS-CoV-2 in our patients was relatively favorable. However, COVID-19 should not be considered a mild disease in CF patients, particularly for those with severely impaired respiratory function and organ transplant.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination hesitancy is a threat as COVID-19 vaccines have reduced both viral transmission and virus-associated mortality rates, particularly in high-risk subgroups. Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are particularly vulnerable, as the underlying causes of their organ failure and the chronic immunosuppression are associated with a lower immune response to COVID-19 vaccines, and with an excessive risk of death due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. We aimed to evaluate COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and its reasons in a population of SOTRs. Methods: All the SOTRs attending our post-transplant clinics were asked to fill in a vaccination status form with specific validated questions related to their willingness to receive a third vaccine dose. In the case of negative answers, the patients were encouraged to explain the reasons for their refusal. Among the SOTRs (1899), 1019 were investigated (53.7%). Results: Overall, 5.01% (51/1019) of the SOTRs raised concerns regarding the future third dose vaccination. In more detail, hesitancy rates were 3.3% (15/453), 4.2% (7/166), and 7.3% (29/400) among the investigated liver, lung, and kidney transplant recipients, respectively (p = 0.0018). The main reasons for hesitancy were fear of adverse events (30/51, 58.8%) and perceived lack of efficacy (21/51, 41.2%). Conclusions: Full adherence to ongoing or future vaccination campaigns is crucial to prevent, or at least reduce, COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality in fragile patients. The identification of the reasons influencing COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy in these patients is very important to establish appropriate and targeted patient–doctor communication strategies, and to further implement specific vaccination campaigns.

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a viable treatment that slows the progression of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Despite its immunoregulatory potential, data on extracorporeal photopheresis as an induction therapy remain rather limited. We conducted a pilot randomized controlled study on ECP as induction therapy in cystic fibrosis patients undergoing primary lung transplantation. Primary endpoints included safety, assessed based on the incidence of adverse events, treatment-related toxicity, and procedure-related complication rates; and feasibility, evaluated through the completion rate of scheduled ECP sessions, patient tolerability, and treatment discontinuation rates. Secondary endpoint consisted of an exploratory assessment of efficacy, using a composite measure that included three key components: freedom from biopsy-proven acute rejection within the first 12 months, absence of chronic lung allograft dysfunction at 36 months, and optimal graft function, defined as a predicted forced expiratory volume in the first second ≥ 90% at 36 months. Finally, exploratory endpoints included cell phenotypic and functional analyses, secreted immune protein profiling, and gene expression analysis for mechanistic insights. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either standard immunosuppressive therapy alone or standard therapy plus six sessions of extracorporeal photopheresis, with a follow-up period of 36 months. Among 36 cystic fibrosis patients who underwent lung transplantation between 2018 and 2021 and met the eligibility criteria, 21 were randomized (9 to the study group and 12 to the control group). No patients in the treatment group experienced adverse events. The enrollment rate was 61%, and the treatment discontinuation rate was 22%. The clinical composite endpoint was achieved by 28.6% of patients in the treatment group and 16.7% in the control group. Exploratory endpoint analyses revealed significant decreases in pro-inflammatory cytokines, degranulating CD8 T lymphocytes, and NK cells in the treatment group. Moreover, significant increases in Treg lymphocytes, IL-10-producing NK cells, and anti-inflammatory cytokines appeared to be associated with improved pulmonary function in the treatment group. Induction therapy with extracorporeal photopheresis is safe and feasible in lung transplantation for cystic fibrosis. Some clinical benefits appear to persist for the first 36 months of follow-up. Interestingly, a correlation between immunological modulation induced by extracorporeal photopheresis and pulmonary function was observed. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03500575?cond=NCT03500575&rank=1, identifier NCT03500575.

This study assessed humoral and T cell-mediated immune responses to the BNT162b2 vaccine in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) and lung transplant (LUT) recipients who received three doses of the vaccine from March 2021 at our institution. Serum samples were collected 60 days post-second and third dose to quantify antibodies against the spike region of SARS-CoV-2 while whole blood samples were collected to analyze the SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response using an IFN-γ ELISpot assay. We enrolled 244 OLT and 120 LUT recipients. The third dose increased antibody titres in OLT recipients (from a median value of 131 after the second dose to 5523 IU/mL, p < 0.001) and LUT recipients (from 14.8 to 1729 IU/mL, p < 0.001). T-cell response also increased in OLT recipients (from 8.5 to 23 IFN-γ SFU per 250,000 PBMC, p < 0.001) and LUT recipients (from 8 to 15 IFN-γ SFU per 250,000 PBMC, p < 0.001). A total of 128 breakthrough infections were observed: two (0.8%) OLT recipients were hospitalized due to COVID-19 and one died (0.4%); among LUT recipients, seven were hospitalized (5.8%) and two patients died (1.7%). In conclusion, the three-dose schedule of the BNT162b2 vaccine elicited both humoral and T cell-mediated responses in solid organ transplant recipients. The risk of severe COVID-19 post-vaccination was low in this population.