Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
2 result(s) for "Mutawe, Batool"
Sort by:
Is Protein Quantification and Physical Normalization Always Necessary in Proteomics?
Dogma suggests protein quantification is a pre-requisite to LC-MS/MS based proteomics studies. Such quantification allows a standardized ratio of sample to digestion enzyme and enables physical normalization of protein digest loaded onto the mass spectrometer for analysis. Most proteomics studies include these steps. However, there are significant costs in time, money and experimental complexity, associated with performing protein quantification and physical normalization for every sample, especially for larger studies. Proteomics data analysis pipelines typically include computational normalization strategies to compensate for unavoidable systematic biases. These strategies also have the potential to compensate for avoidable variation such as omitting sample amount normalization. Here we investigate the effects of either physically normalizing the amount of protein for each individual sample or leaving it unnormalized. Our results show the relationship between increased protein amount variation in sample input, and the variance of quantified relative abundances of peptides and proteins output after data analysis. The experiments presented here suggest that protein quantification and physical normalization steps can be omitted from some quantitative proteomic experiments without incurring an unacceptable increase in measurement variability after computational normalization has been applied. This work will enable important time and cost saving optimizations to be made to many proteomics workflows.
A quantitative proteomics dataset for assessment and prediction of low dose X-ray radiation exposure in mice
Ionizing radiation induces molecular responses that may be used to estimate exposure when physical dosimeters are unavailable. Here we present two large-scale proteomics datasets generated from mouse dorsal skin punch samples collected following controlled X-ray exposures spanning multiple doses, dose rates, and post-exposure time points. Experiment 1 comprised 96 samples (including 16 reference samples) collected 6 days after exposure to 0-75 cGy delivered at either 30 or 300 cGy/min. Experiment 2 comprised 936 samples (including 236 reference samples) exposed to 0-100 cGy at either 3 or 28 cGy/min dose rates and harvested between 7 and 150 days post-exposure. All samples were processed using a standardized workflow involving automated bead-based digestion and data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry. The datasets include multiple pooled reference sample types, process controls, and system suitability standards ensuring high quality data. All data presented are available via ProteomeXchange at several levels of processing, from raw files through normalized peptide- and protein-level abundance matrices suitable for biomarker discovery and machine learning applications. This dataset will facilitate generation of new insights into the biological changes and molecular signatures resulting from X-ray exposure in mice and may also help inform future studies in humans.