Explore the vast range of titles available.

Patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous semaglutide or placebo. The incidence of NASH resolution was significantly higher with semaglutide than with placebo, but the between-group difference in the incidence of an improvement in fibrosis stage was not significant.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), the progressive inflammatory form of MASLD, is now a leading cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. Driven by obesity and type 2 diabetes, MASH significantly increases the risk of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver failure. While public health interventions remain essential, therapeutic strategies targeting metabolic dysfunction, inflammation, and fibrosis are urgently needed. This Review focuses on pharmacological treatments in advanced development, including incretin-based therapies (GLP-1, dual, and triple agonists), metabolic modulators (PPAR, FGF21, and THR-β agonists), and novel agents such as fatty acid synthase inhibitors. Current regulatory approval is based on histological end points, with increasing interest in noninvasive biomarkers and personalized treatment approaches. Recent trials with agents such as semaglutide, tirzepatide, survodutide, lanifibranor, pegozafermin, and resmetirom demonstrate substantial promise in resolving MASH and improving fibrosis, but unresolved issues remain regarding treatment duration, response heterogeneity, and long-term adherence. Genetic variants (e.g., PNPLA3 polymorphisms) and emerging molecular biomarkers may enhance stratification, while artificial intelligence is beginning to shape trial design and drug development. As the field moves toward combination therapies and precision medicine, the definition of therapeutic success will likely evolve to reflect both histological improvement and patient-reported outcomes. This Review provides a timely synthesis of the landscape, challenges, and future directions in MASH therapeutics.

Key Points Liver regeneration occurs efficiently in the normal liver to restore architecture, size and function; chronic injury severely impairs liver regeneration through excess inflammation, scarring and epithelial abnormalities, and is less well-studied but clinically important New experimental models are emerging; zebrafish are an excellent new tool to study liver regeneration and enable large-scale chemical screening assays A gap exists between current animal models of liver regeneration and clinically important scenarios of severe liver injury and impaired liver regeneration Understanding and promoting regeneration and repair of the failing liver is a key challenge of major clinical importance Modern imaging techniques will enable noninvasive real-time assessment of liver structure and function Cell therapies that have been successful in animal models are now being trialled in the more challenging clinical arena Liver regeneration is important in both the context of homeostasis and in recovery from disease or injury. In this Review, Forbes and Newsome describe the mechanisms underlying liver regeneration and the experimental models used to study this process, as well as discussing how liver regeneration is clinically relevant. Liver regeneration has been studied for many decades and the mechanisms underlying regeneration of the normal liver following resection or moderate damage are well described. A large number of factors extrinsic (such as bile acids and circulating growth factors) and intrinsic to the liver interact to initiate and regulate liver regeneration. Less well understood, and more clinically relevant, are the factors at play when the abnormal liver is required to regenerate. Fatty liver disease, chronic scarring, prior chemotherapy and massive liver injury can all inhibit the normal programme of regeneration and can lead to liver failure. Understanding these mechanisms could enable the rational targeting of specific therapies to either reduce the factors inhibiting regeneration or directly stimulate liver regeneration. Although animal models of liver regeneration have been highly instructive, the clinical relevance of some models could be improved to bridge the gap between our in vivo model systems and the clinical situation. Likewise, modern imaging techniques such as spectroscopy will probably improve our understanding of whole-organ metabolism and how this predicts the liver's regenerative capacity. This Review describes briefly the mechanisms underpinning liver regeneration, the models used to study this process, and discusses areas in which failed or compromised liver regeneration is clinically relevant.

In this phase 2 trial involving adults with metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis, survodutide was superior to placebo with respect to improvement in MASH without worsening of fibrosis.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), the progressive inflammatory form of MASLD, is now a leading cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. Driven by obesity and type 2 diabetes, MASH significantly increases the risk of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver failure. While public health interventions remain essential, therapeutic strategies targeting metabolic dysfunction, inflammation, and fibrosis are urgently needed. This Review focuses on pharmacological treatments in advanced development, including incretin-based therapies (GLP-1, dual, and triple agonists), metabolic modulators (PPAR, FGF21, and THR-[beta] agonists), and novel agents such as fatty acid synthase inhibitors. Current regulatory approval is based on histological end points, with increasing interest in noninvasive biomarkers and personalized treatment approaches. Recent trials with agents such as semaglutide, tirzepatide, survodutide, lanifibranor, pegozafermin, and resmetirom demonstrate substantial promise in resolving MASH and improving fibrosis, but unresolved issues remain regarding treatment duration, response heterogeneity, and long-term adherence. Genetic variants (e.g., PNPLA3 polymorphisms) and emerging molecular biomarkers may enhance stratification, while artificial intelligence is beginning to shape trial design and drug development. As the field moves toward combination therapies and precision medicine, the definition of therapeutic success will likely evolve to reflect both histological improvement and patient-reported outcomes. This Review provides a timely synthesis of the landscape, challenges, and future directions in MASH therapeutics.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues reduce hepatic steatosis, concentrations of liver enzymes, and insulin resistance in murine models of fatty liver disease. These analogues are licensed for type 2 diabetes, but their efficacy in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis is unknown. We assessed the safety and efficacy of the long-acting GLP-1 analogue, liraglutide, in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. This multicentre, double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial was conducted in four UK medical centres to assess subcutaneous injections of liraglutide (1·8 mg daily) compared with placebo for patients who are overweight and show clinical evidence of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computer-generated, centrally administered procedure, stratified by trial centre and diabetes status. The trial was designed using A'Hern's single-group method, which required eight (38%) of 21 successes in the liraglutide group for the effect of liraglutide to be considered clinically significant. Patients, investigators, clinical trial site staff, and pathologists were masked to treatment assignment throughout the study. The primary outcome measure was resolution of definite non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with no worsening in fibrosis from baseline to end of treatment (48 weeks), as assessed centrally by two independent pathologists. Analysis was done by intention-to-treat analysis, which included all patients who underwent end-of-treatment biopsy. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01237119. Between Aug 1, 2010, and May 31, 2013, 26 patients were randomly assigned to receive liraglutide and 26 to placebo. Nine (39%) of 23 patients who received liraglutide and underwent end-of-treatment liver biopsy had resolution of definite non-alcoholic steatohepatitis compared with two (9%) of 22 such patients in the placebo group (relative risk 4·3 [95% CI 1·0–17·7]; p=0·019). Two (9%) of 23 patients in the liraglutide group versus eight (36%) of 22 patients in the placebo group had progression of fibrosis (0·2 [0·1–1·0]; p=0·04). Most adverse events were grade 1 (mild) to grade 2 (moderate) in severity, transient, and similar in the two treatment groups for all organ classes and symptoms, with the exception of gastrointestinal disorders in 21 (81%) of 23 patients in the liraglutide group and 17 (65%) of 22 patients in the placebo group, which included diarrhoea (ten [38%] patients in the liraglutide group vs five [19%] in the placebo group), constipation (seven [27%] vs none), and loss of appetite (eight [31%] vs two [8%]). Liraglutide was safe, well tolerated, and led to histological resolution of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, warranting extensive, longer-term studies. Wellcome Trust, National Institute of Health Research, and Novo Nordisk.

Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, is a candidate for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). In this ongoing phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned 1197 patients with biopsy-defined MASH and fibrosis stage 2 or 3 in a 2:1 ratio to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide at a dose of 2.4 mg or placebo for 240 weeks. The results of a planned interim analysis conducted at week 72 involving the first 800 patients are reported here (part 1). The primary end points for part 1 were the resolution of steatohepatitis without worsening of liver fibrosis and reduction in liver fibrosis without worsening of steatohepatitis. Resolution of steatohepatitis without worsening of fibrosis occurred in 62.9% of the 534 patients in the semaglutide group and in 34.3% of the 266 patients in the placebo group (estimated difference, 28.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21.1 to 36.2; P<0.001). A reduction in liver fibrosis without worsening of steatohepatitis was reported in 36.8% of the patients in the semaglutide group and in 22.4% of those in the placebo group (estimated difference, 14.4 percentage points; 95% CI, 7.5 to 21.3; P<0.001). Results for the three secondary outcomes that were included in the plan to adjust for multiple testing were as follows: combined resolution of steatohepatitis and reduction in liver fibrosis was reported in 32.7% of the patients in the semaglutide group and in 16.1% of those in the placebo group (estimated difference, 16.5 percentage points; 95% CI, 10.2 to 22.8; P<0.001). The mean change in body weight was -10.5% with semaglutide and -2.0% with placebo (estimated difference, -8.5 percentage points; 95% CI, -9.6 to -7.4; P<0.001). Mean changes in bodily pain scores did not differ significantly between the two groups. Gastrointestinal adverse events were more common in the semaglutide group. In patients with MASH and moderate or advanced liver fibrosis, once-weekly semaglutide at a dose of 2.4 mg improved liver histologic results. (Funded by Novo Nordisk; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04822181.).

These updated guidelines on the management of abnormal liver blood tests have been commissioned by the Clinical Services and Standards Committee (CSSC) of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) under the auspices of the liver section of the BSG. The original guidelines, which this document supersedes, were written in 2000 and have undergone extensive revision by members of the Guidelines Development Group (GDG). The GDG comprises representatives from patient/carer groups (British Liver Trust, Liver4life, PBC Foundation and PSC Support), elected members of the BSG liver section (including representatives from Scotland and Wales), British Association for the Study of the Liver (BASL), Specialist Advisory Committee in Clinical Biochemistry/Royal College of Pathology and Association for Clinical Biochemistry, British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (BSPGHAN), Public Health England (implementation and screening), Royal College of General Practice, British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiologists (BSGAR) and Society of Acute Medicine. The quality of evidence and grading of recommendations was appraised using the AGREE II tool. These guidelines deal specifically with the management of abnormal liver blood tests in children and adults in both primary and secondary care under the following subheadings: (1) What constitutes an abnormal liver blood test? (2) What constitutes a standard liver blood test panel? (3) When should liver blood tests be checked? (4) Does the extent and duration of abnormal liver blood tests determine subsequent investigation? (5) Response to abnormal liver blood tests. They are not designed to deal with the management of the underlying liver disease.

Physical activity and weight-loss strategies are the mainstay for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), with aerobic and resistance training having been shown to reduce hepatic steatosis and NAFLD-associated cardiovascular risks.3 Bodyweight loss of more than 10% has been shown to improve fibrosis,4 but this level of weight loss is seldom reached with lifestyle change, let alone maintained in the longer term. [...]in an open-label study, Pais and colleagues showed that despite substantial weight loss after bariatric surgery, 47% of patients still had advanced fibrosis, although many more had improvements in fibrosis.5 In The Lancet Ornella Verrastro and colleagues6 present the first multicentre, open-label, randomised trial randomly assigning 288 patients with biopsy-proven NASH to either an intensive lifestyle intervention with best medical care (n=96 [33%]), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n=96 [33%]), or sleeve gastrectomy (n=96 [33%]). In this study, mean baseline BMI in the lifestyle modification group was 41·2 (SD 6·4), which means that patients were also eligible for the higher dose of liraglutide at 3·0 mg rather than the 1·8 mg daily dosing used in this study. [...]there is value in considering the potential utility of combining bariatric surgery with pharmacotherapy to enhance efficacy.

Unlike for advanced liver fibrosis, the practical rules for the early non-invasive diagnosis of cirrhosis in NAFLD remain not well defined. Here, we report the derivation and validation of a stepwise diagnostic algorithm in 1568 patients with NAFLD and liver biopsy coming from four independent cohorts. The study algorithm, using first the elastography-based tests Agile3+ and Agile4 and then the specialized blood tests FibroMeter V3G and CirrhoMeter V3G , provides stratification in four groups, the last of which is enriched in cirrhosis (71% prevalence in the validation set). A risk prediction chart is also derived to allow estimation of the individual probability of cirrhosis. The predicted risk shows excellent calibration in the validation set, and mean difference with perfect prediction is only −2.9%. These tools improve the personalized non-invasive diagnosis of cirrhosis in NAFLD. The practical rules for the early non-invasive diagnosis of cirrhosis in NAFLD are not well defined. Here, the authors develop and validate two diagnostic tools: a stepwise stratification algorithm including a cirrhosis group, and a risk prediction chart providing a personalized assessment of the individual probability of cirrhosis.