Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background: An appropriate and effective management of haemophilia is currently based on a multidimensional evaluation of treatment adequacy. Current clinical practice however is still lacking standardised tools able to combine clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes. In this study a structured Monitoring Tool for haemophilia A and B was developed and validated through a Delphi-based expert consensus process. This study represents an expert consensus-based validation of a monitoring framework, rather than a clinical validation in patient cohorts. The tool is intended for use by haemophilia treaters during routine follow-up visits to support structured treatment reassessment. Score categories reflect the need for clinical re-evaluation or potential treatment optimisation, rather than disease severity. Methods: Italian haemophilia specialists were asked to participate to a panel over a two-round Delphi process. Experts rated the relevance of several predefined clinical domains—pharmacokinetics, bleeding episodes, joint health, adherence and quality of life (QoL)—and the individual items within each domain for patients on prophylactic or on-demand treatment. Consensus was defined by responses within an interquartile range (IQR) < 8. Section and item weights and Likert-based scoring values were used to reach a composite score between 0 and 100. Results: Consensus was achieved for all domains and items across haemophilia types and treatments, prophylaxis and on demand (Haemophilia A: 16 and 12 participants; Haemophilia B: 12 and 9, respectively). With reference to prophylaxis domains, bleeding episodes received the highest domain weight (31–32%), followed by joint health (27–29%) and adherence/QoL (21–23%) and pharmacokinetics (18–19%). For on-demand treatment, pharmacokinetics was excluded; bleeding episodes (38–40%) and joint health (35–37%) remained dominant. At the item level, dynamic joint health indicators (HJHS and HEAD-US changes) and longitudinal QoL changes consistently received the highest weights. The final scoring system categorised results as Excellent (0–25), Suboptimal (26–50), Poor (51–75), or Critical (76–100). Conclusions: The Delphi-validated Monitoring Tools provide a structured, weighted, and clinically relevant framework for assessing treatment adequacy in haemophilia A and B across prophylactic and on-demand settings. These tools allow multidimensional outcome assessment and may support a more consistent, personalised therapeutic decision-making. A prospective validation of the tool in clinical cohorts is warranted.

Sepsis related coagulopathy ranges from mild laboratory alterations up to severe disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). There is evidence that DIC is involved in the pathogenesis of microvascular dysfunction contributing to organ failure. Additionally, the systemic activation of coagulation, by consuming platelets and coagulation factors, may cause bleeding. Thrombin generation via the tissue factor/factor VIIa route, contemporary depression of antithrombin and protein C anticoagulant system, as well as impaired fibrin degradation, due to high circulating levels of PAI-1, contribute to enhanced intravascular fibrin deposition. This deranged coagulopathy is an independent predictor of clinical outcome in patients with severe sepsis. Innovative supportive strategies aiming at the inhibition of coagulation activation comprise inhibition of tissue factor-mediated activation or restoration of physiological anticoagulant pathways, as the administration of recombinant human activated protein C or concentrate. In spite of some promising initial studies, additional trials are needed to define their clinical effectiveness in adults and children with severe sepsis.

Haemophilia A (HA) is an X‐linked bleeding disorder caused by factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency, treated with FVIII infusions or, more recently, Emicizumab subcutaneously. Although Emicizumab is safe and effective, FVIII is still required for severe bleeding, trauma, or surgery, and few studies have compared these prophylactic options in paediatric patients. This study explores the immunological and haematological profiles of paediatric HA patients receiving FVIII or Emicizumab, using haemophilia B patients and healthy controls. Clinical parameters and immune cell populations showed no major differences aside from age‐related variations. However, HA patients displayed higher HLA‐DR expression on CD14+ cells than healthy controls, and Emicizumab‐treated patients showed increased HLA‐DR expression on CD11c+ cells compared with FVIII‐treated patients. Plasma cytokines including IL‐12p40, TNF‐α, CCL‐22, IL‐18, and CCL‐4 were elevated in HA, suggesting a dysregulated myeloid compartment in HA. Patient‐derived macrophages exhibited a stronger pro‐inflammatory (M1‐like) polarization after in vitro FVIII stimulation, with increased TNF‐α and reduced TGF‐β gene expression. Stratification by prophylaxis showed that macrophages from FVIII‐treated patients maintained the M1 phenotype, whereas those from Emicizumab‐treated patients showed no clear shift and tended toward an immune‐regulatory profile. These findings highlight distinct myeloid and cytokine signatures associated with different prophylaxis, emphasizing the need for optimized therapeutic strategies.

Background and Objective Recombinant factor XIII (rFXIII) at the recommended dosage of 35 IU/kg every 4 weeks is currently used for prophylaxis of bleeding in patients affected by FXIII deficiency. The aim of this study was to describe the population pharmacokinetics of rFXIII in patients with FXIII deficiency being treated with rFXIII in real-life and to assess, using Monte Carlo simulations, the attainment of defined FXIII concentration thresholds associated with prevention of the risk of bleeding over time. Methods A nonlinear mixed-effects model approach was used for population analysis. Monte Carlo simulations were used to generate 10,000 FXIII concentration-time profiles associated with incremental doses of 25, 30, 35, 40, 45 and 50 IU/kg of rFXIII. The probability of target attainment (PTA) of FXIII concentrations at thresholds of > 0.05, > 0.10 and > 0.15 IU/mL were calculated weekly, from days 7 to 49. Results A total of 18 patients provided 99 FXIII concentrations; most patients (77.8%, 14/18) had severe FXIII deficiency. A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with linear elimination from the central compartment best described rFXIII data. No covariates were associated with rFXIII disposition. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were 0.16 mL/h/kg for clearance, 57.35 mL/kg for volume of distribution at steady-state, and 11.72 days for elimination half-life. The standard 35 IU/kg dose resulted in PTAs of the pharmacodynamic thresholds of FXIII concentrations of > 0.05, > 0.10 and > 0.15 IU/mL at day 28 that were equal to 89.9%, 68.9% and 47.8%, respectively. Conclusions Intensive FXIII monitoring from day 14, and/or shortening the dosing interval between rFXIII administrations, should be considered to minimise the risk of bleeding.

Hemophilia A (HA) is an inherited X-linked bleeding disorder, caused by the deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII), with variable clinical phenotypes [...].Hemophilia A (HA) is an inherited X-linked bleeding disorder, caused by the deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII), with variable clinical phenotypes [...].

rVIII-SingleChain is indicated for treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding in patients with haemophilia A (HA). The safety and efficacy of rVIII-SingleChain have previously been shown in the AFFINITY clinical trial programme. This survey evaluated clinical experience following a switch to rVIII-SingleChain from the perspective of both physicians and patients. A web-based survey (July–September 2019) involving 14 Haemophilia Treatment Centres (HTCs) collected data about HA patients who were under treatment with rVIII-SingleChain for ≥ 12 months, as reported by their physicians. In addition, about half of these patients were separately interviewed. Out of 91 patients receiving rVIII-SingleChain in the 14 participating HTCs, 48 had been treated for ≥ 12 months; among those 48, 38% were ≤ 18 years, 37% 19–40 years and 25 % ≥ 41 years; 73% of them had severe HA and 85% were being treated with prophylactic therapy. Twenty-six patients accepted to be separately interviewed: mean age was 30 years; 62% had severe HA and 85% were receiving prophylaxis. Focusing on those patients who were already in prophylaxis with prior FVIII (all but one with recombinant factors), infusion frequency was significantly reduced from 3–2 per week following the switch to rVIII-SingleChain (mean, 2.74 vs. 2.44, respectively; p=0.013), as reported by physicians; the rate of patients needing 3 infusions per week dropped from 74% with previous products to 44% with rFVIII-SingleChain. The annual mean factor consumption was 4740 IU/Kg (median, 4500 IU/Kg; min, 2.215 IU/Kg; max, 7.200 IU/Kg) with prior product and 4320 IU/Kg (median, 4320 IU/Kg; min, 2.215 IU/Kg; max, 6.646 IU/Kg) with rVIII-SingleChain. Both physicians and patients reported a significant reduction in annual total bleeding rates with rVIII-SingleChain compared with prior product (mean 2.15–0.96 and 2.46–0.71 events/year, p = 0.031 and p = 0.018, respectively). Mean satisfaction ratings (from 1; dissatisfied, to 5; very satisfied) for rVIII-SingleChain were quite high for both physicians (4.14, 86% satisfied/very satisfied) and patients (4.18, 86% satisfied/very satisfied). This survey suggested that switching to rVIII-SingleChain allowed patients to reduce their injection frequency without increasing factor consumption or compromising clinical results. Both physicians and patients reported a positive experience with rVIII-SingleChain after 1 year of treatment.

Background: Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a highly serious event in patients with haemophilia (PWH) which leads to disability and in some cases to death. ICH occurs among all ages but is particularly frequent in newborns. Aim: The primary aim was to assess the incidence and mortality due to ICH in an Italian population of PWH. Secondary aims were to evaluate the risk factors for ICH, the role of prophylaxis, and the clinical management of patients presenting ICH. Methods: A retrospective-prospective registry was established in the network of the Italian Association of Haemophilia Centers to collect all ICHs in PWH from 2009 to 2019 reporting clinical features, treatments, and outcomes. Results: Forty-six ICHs were collected from 13 Centers. The ICHs occurred in 15 children (10 < 2 years), and in 31 adults, 45.2% of them with mild hemophilia. Overall, 60.9% patients had severe haemophilia (15/15 children). Overall ICH incidence (×1000 person/year) was 0.360 (0.270–0.480 95% CI), higher in children <2 years, 1.995 (1.110–3.442 95% CI). Only 7/46 patients, all with severe haemophilia, had received a prophylactic regimen before the ICH, none with mild. Inhibitors were present in 10.9% of patients. In adult PWHs 17/31 suffered from hypertension; 85.7% of the mild subjects and 29.4% of the moderate/severe ones (p < 0.05). ICH was spontaneous in the 69.6% with lower rate in children (46.7%). Surgery was required in 21/46 patients for cerebral hematoma evacuation. Treatment with coagulation factor concentrates for at least three weeks was needed in 76.7% of cases. ICH was fatal in 30.4% of the cases. Of the survivors, 50.0% became permanently disabled. Only one-third of adult patients received long term prophylaxis after the acute treatment. Conclusion: The results from our Registry confirm the still high incidence of ICH in infants <2 years and in adults, particularly in mild PWHs presenting hypertension and its unfavorable outcomes. The majority of PWHs were treated on-demand before ICH occurred, suggesting the important role of prophylaxis in preventing such life-threatening bleeding.

Background/Objectives: A compartmental pharmacokinetics (PK) analysis of new extended half-life FVIII concentrates has never been performed in a large cohort of hemophilia patients. An improved PK analysis of individual outcomes may help to tailor hemophilia replacement treatment. Methods: PK outcomes after the infusion of a standard single dose of Efmoroctocog alfa were collected from 173 patients with severe/moderately severe hemophilia A in 11 Italian hemophilia centers. Factor VIII clotting activity (FVIII:C) was measured by one-stage clotting assay (OSA) in all patients, and chromogenic substrate assay (CSA) in a subgroup (n = 52). Fifty patients underwent a comparative PK assessment with standard half-life (SHL) recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) products. Non-compartmental analysis (NCA), one compartment model (OCM), and TCM were used to analyze the decay curves of all patients, and one-way paired ANOVA to compare the PK outcomes. Results: All 173 PKs conformed to the NCA and OCM, but only 106 (61%) conformed to the TCM based on the biphasic features of their decay curves. According to the TCM, the Beta HL and MRT of rFVIIIFc were 20.42 ± 7.73 and 25.64 ± 7.61 h, respectively. ANOVA analysis of the outcomes from the three PK models showed significant differences in clearance, half-life (HL), and mean residence time (MRT) (p < 0.001 for all parameters). As anticipated, the HL and MRT of rFVIIIFc were longer than those of SHL rFVIII. Comparing OSA with CSA outcomes, Cmax resulted higher when measured by CSA (p = 0.05) and, according to TCM, Beta HL resulted longer when measured by OSA (p = 0.03). FVIII:C trough levels obtained with SHL concentrates were significantly lower than those obtained with rFVIIIFc at each post-infusion time point. Conclusions: In a large group of hemophilia A (HA) patients, three different PK models confirmed the improved pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of rFVIIIFc, compared with standard half-life rFVIII concentrates. The TCM only fits two-thirds of the PKs, highlighting their biphasic decay and a long Beta half-life. In these patients, the TCM would be preferable to properly evaluate individual PK features.

The objective of this scoping review is to summarize the current use of pharmacokinetics for tailoring prophylaxis in hemophilia patients switching between clotting factor products. Patients with hemophilia may require switching of clotting factor concentrates due to a variety of factors, but there have been perceived risks associated with switching, such as inhibitor development or suboptimal protection due to inadequate dosing while titrating treatment. Studies that look at patients switching from one clotting factor concentrate to another are categorized in terms of their primary and/or secondary objectives, notably biosimilarity and comparative pharmacokinetic studies and inhibitor development studies. Research on how best to switch concentrates with respect to dosing regimen are lacking, and currently a trial‐and‐error approach is used for dosing the new factor concentrate. In the future, studies looking at the predictability of pharmacokinetics (PK) of a new factor concentrate based on individual PK knowledge of the original factor concentrate may offer clinical benefit by providing a safer switching approach and protocol.