Explore the vast range of titles available.

PBK/TOPK (PDZ-binding kinase, T-LAK-cell-originated protein kinase) is a serine-threonine kinase that is overexpressed in a variety of tumor cells but its role in oncogenesis remains unclear. Here we show, by co-immunoprecipitation experiments and yeast two-hybrid analysis, that PBK/TOPK physically interacts with the tumor suppressor p53 through its DNA-binding (DBD) domain in HCT116 colorectal carcinoma cells that express wild-type p53. PBK also binds to p53 mutants carrying five common point mutations in the DBD domain. The PBK–p53 interaction appears to downmodulate p53 transactivation function as indicated by PBK/TOPK knockdown experiments, which show upregulated expression of the key p53 target gene and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 in HCT116 cells, particularly after genotoxic damage from doxorubicin. Furthermore, stable PBK/TOPK knockdown cell lines (derived from HCT116 and MCF-7 cells) showed increased apoptosis, G 2 /M arrest and slower growth as compared to stable empty vector-transfected control cell lines. Gene microarray studies identified additional p53 target genes involved in apoptosis or cell cycling, which were differentially regulated by PBK knockdown. Together, these data suggest that increased levels of PBK/TOPK may contribute to tumor cell development and progression through suppression of p53 function and consequent reductions in the cell-cycle regulatory proteins such as p21. PBK/TOPK may therefore be a valid target for antineoplastic kinase inhibitors to sensitize tumor cells to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis and growth suppression.

Resistance to imatinib (IM) and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI)s is an increasing problem in leukemias caused by expression of BCR-ABL1. As chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cell lines expressing BCR-ABL1 utilize an alternative non-homologous end-joining pathway (ALT NHEJ) to repair DNA double-strand breaks (DSB)s, we asked whether this repair pathway is a novel therapeutic target in TKI-resistant disease. Notably, the steady state levels of two ALT NHEJ proteins, poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) and DNA ligase IIIα, were increased in the BCR-ABL1-positive CML cell line K562 and, to a greater extent, in its imatinib-resistant (IMR) derivative. Incubation of these cell lines with a combination of DNA ligase and PARP inhibitors inhibited ALT NHEJ and selectively decreased survival with the effect being greater in the IMR derivative. Similar results were obtained with TKI-resistant derivatives of two hematopoietic cell lines that had been engineered to stably express BCR-ABL1. Together our results show that the sensitivity of cell lines expressing BCR-ABL1 to the combination of DNA ligase and PARP inhibitors correlates with the steady state levels of PARP1 and DNA ligase IIIα, and ALT NHEJ activity. Importantly, analysis of clinical samples from CML patients confirmed that the expression levels of PARP1 and DNA ligase IIIα correlated with the sensitivity to the DNA repair inhibitor combination. Thus, the expression levels of PARP1 and DNA ligase IIIα serve as biomarkers to identify a subgroup of CML patients who may be candidates for therapies that target the ALT NHEJ pathway when treatment with TKIs has failed.

Four patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) that was refractory to interferon alpha (two patients) or imatinib mesylate (two patients), and who lacked donors for allogeneic stem cell transplantation, received autotransplants followed by infusions of ex vivo costimulated autologous T cells. At day +30 (about 14 days after T-cell infusion), the mean CD4+ cell count was 481 cells/microl (range 270-834) and the mean CD8+ count was 516 cells/microl (range 173-1261). One patient had a relative lymphocytosis at 3.5 months after T-cell infusion, with CD4 and CD8 levels of 750 and 1985 cells/microl, respectively. All the four patients had complete cytogenetic remissions early after transplantation, three of whom also became PCR negative for the bcr/abl fusion mRNA. One patient, who had experienced progressive CML while on interferon alpha therapy, became PCR- post transplant, and remained in a molecular CR at 3.0 years of follow-up. All the four patients survived at 6, 9, 40, and 44 months post transplant; the patient who remained PCR+ had a cytogenetic and hematologic relapse of CML, but entered a molecular remission on imatinib. Autotransplantation followed by costimulated autologous T cells is feasible for patients with chronic phase CML, who lack allogeneic donors and can be associated with molecular remissions.

The purpose of the study was to examine the yield of CD34(+) cells, response rates, and toxicity of high-dose cyclophosphamide with or without etoposide in patients with multiple myeloma. In total, 77 myeloma patients received either cyclophosphamide 4.5 g/m(2) (n=28) alone or with etoposide 2 g/m(2) (n=49) in a nonrandomized manner, followed by G-CSF 10 microg/kg/day for the purpose of stem cell mobilization. The effects of various factors on CD34(+) cell yield, response rate and engraftment were explored. A median of 22.39 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg were collected on the first day of leukapheresis (range 0.59-114.71 x 10(6)/kg) in 71 (92%) of patients. Greater marrow plasma cell infiltration (P=0.02) or prior radiation therapy (P=0.02) adversely affected CD34(+) cell yield. In total, 45% of patients receiving cyclophosphamide and 56% of those receiving cyclophosphamide/etoposide had at least a minimum response by EBMT criteria. In all, 25% of patients who received cyclophosphamide alone vs 75.5% of patients who received combined chemotherapy required hospitalization mainly for treatment of neutropenic fever. Cyclophosphamide alone is associated with impressive CD34(+) cell yields and clear antimyeloma activity. The addition of etoposide resulted in increased toxicity without significant improvement in CD34(+) cell yield or response rates.

Although patient outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) have significantly improved in recent years, complications and associated mortality remain substantial. Although many transplants are performed worldwide, the number of patients enrolled prospectively into clinical trials is small. Patient and physician preferences often override treatment assignments in randomized transplant trials, biasing the common intention-to-treat analyses. Large retrospective and observational database studies are likely to detect the real effect of allo-HCT. However, they may be subject to immortal time and other biases derived from heterogeneity of allo-HCT indications and approaches and differences in referral or institutional policies affecting patient selection. Timing of the transplant procedure may be fundamental but studies commencing at start of transplant may neglect the influence of pretransplant therapies. Conversely, a prolonged lag period between the decision and execution of transplant may artificially ‘improve’ the outcome by ‘natural’ selection weeding out patients relapsing or dying before transplant. Finally, comparative nonrandomized transplantation trials often suffer from unbalanced assignment for therapy arms. We herein present common clinical dilemmas discussing proper application of available evidence in daily clinical practice. Pitfalls and caveats frequent in clinical studies of allo-SCT are highlighted to promote a balanced interpretation of available data.

Relapses after autologous stem cell transplants for hematopoietic malignancies are frequent and post-transplant infections continue to cause significant post-transplant morbidity and even mortality. The post-transplant period is typically characterized by low lymphocyte counts and impaired immune cell function. Early restoration of immune function may contribute to better disease control and enhance protection from infections. Indeed the attainment of a ‘minimal residual disease’ status following high-dose therapy makes the early post-transplant period ideal for the introduction of antitumor immunotherapy. Attempts to generate immunity against tumor and microbial antigens after autotransplantation have included vaccinations, T cell infusions (both resting and activated) and combinations of vaccinations and adoptive T cell infusions. One successful strategy for generating robust immune responses against microbial antigens was the combination of pre and post-transplant immunizations along with an early (post-transplant) infusion of in vivo vaccine-primed and ex vivo co-stimulated autologous T cells. Whether this or similar strategies will lead to the generation of effective antitumor immunity is unknown. The lessons gained from efforts to rebuild immune system function in the setting of autotransplantation may also be applicable to the problem of restoring immunity in other immunodeficient groups such as patients with cancer or HIV disease and the elderly.