Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background: Hospitals were affected by COVID-19, with significant concern regarding transmission from unidentified cases. Fraser Health, a Canadian regional health authority, implemented universal testing along with screening questions for emergency department (ED) admissions. We sought to determine which factors were associated with SARS-CoV-2–positive test on admission as well as patient outcome, stratified by screening question responses. Methods: This retrospective analysis included patients aged ≥6 years admitted through 12 hospital EDs between November 1, 2020, and June 30, 2022. Admission, laboratory, and screening data were extracted from electronic health records. Patients who had a first SARS-CoV-2 PCR–positive test in the prior 60 days collected within 48 hours of admission were classified as positive. Covariates included age, geographical region, and SARS-CoV-2 variant era. All questions were modeled using multinomial logistic regression, with components informed through crude analysis in R Studio software. Results: There were 88,511 unique eligible admissions, with 7,642 positive tests (8.6%). The positivity rate over the study period ranged from 0.6% to 21.8%, with a mean of 6.5%. Patients meeting screening criteria were 4.7 times (95% CI, 4.43–4.92) as likely to test positive as those who did not. Patients in the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant era were 3.2 times (95% CI, 2.98–3.47) as likely to test positive as those in the earlier era of the pandemic. Patients later in the pandemic were less likely to be identified by screening questions than those in earlier eras, with patients in the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant era only 14% (95% CI, 12%–17%) as likely as in the earlier stages of the pandemic to be identified by screening questions. Patients who tested positive were 1.5 (95% CI, 1.37–1.64) times as likely to die as patients who tested negative, whereas patients in later stages of the pandemic were less likely to die overall. Discussion : Patients who tested positive on admission were more likely to meet screening criteria; however, screening missed half of all positive cases. It is not known whether patients who tested positive without meeting screening criteria would have resulted in transmission. Conclusions: Due to changes in COVID-19 epidemiology, Fraser Health has discontinued universal admission screening. Although universal testing increased resource needs, more than half of patients who tested positive during the study period would not have been identified based on screening criteria alone, allowing for implementation of precaution measures to prevent possible transmission. Ultimately, the decision to conduct universal testing must be a balance of the resources required, community prevalence, and patient population. Disclosures: None

Background Widespread human-to-human transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus two (SARS-CoV-2) stems from a strong affinity for the cellular receptor angiotensin converting enzyme two (ACE2). We investigate the relationship between a patient’s nasopharyngeal ACE2 transcription and secondary transmission within a series of concurrent hospital associated SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in British Columbia, Canada. Methods Epidemiological case data from the outbreak investigations was merged with public health laboratory records and viral lineage calls, from whole genome sequencing, to reconstruct the concurrent outbreaks using infection tracing transmission network analysis. ACE2 transcription and RNA viral load were measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. The transmission network was resolved to calculate the number of potential secondary cases. Bivariate and multivariable analyses using Poisson and Negative Binomial regression models was performed to estimate the association between ACE2 transcription the number of SARS-CoV-2 secondary cases. Results The infection tracing transmission network provided n  = 76 potential transmission events across n  = 103 cases. Bivariate comparisons found that on average ACE2 transcription did not differ between patients and healthcare workers ( P  = 0.86). High ACE2 transcription was observed in 98.6% of transmission events, either the primary or secondary case had above average ACE2 . Multivariable analysis found that the association between ACE2 transcription (log 2 fold-change) and the number of secondary transmission events differs between patients and healthcare workers. In health care workers Negative Binomial regression estimated that a one-unit change in ACE2 transcription decreases the number of secondary cases (β = -0.132 (95%CI: -0.255 to -0.0181) adjusting for RNA viral load. Conversely, in patients a one-unit change in ACE2 transcription increases the number of secondary cases (β = 0.187 (95% CI: 0.0101 to 0.370) adjusting for RNA viral load. Sensitivity analysis found no significant relationship between ACE2 and secondary transmission in health care workers and confirmed the positive association among patients. Conclusion Our study suggests that ACE2 transcription has a positive association with SARS-CoV-2 secondary transmission in admitted inpatients, but not health care workers in concurrent hospital associated outbreaks, and it should be further investigated as a risk-factor for viral transmission.

Background: Many healthcare facilities have faced the decision of conducting point prevalence testing (PPT) of healthcare workers (HCW) during COVID-19 outbreaks. As a containment strategy, PPT can identify asymptomatic or presymptomatic cases for isolation. It is less clear how useful testing asymptomatic HCW is in understanding the spread and possible routes of transmission in an outbreak. This study investigated HCW cases identified through PPT during acute-care outbreaks in Fraser Health (FH), British Columbia, incorporating both epidemiological and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data to determine their epidemiological source. Methods: This study was a retrospective review of cases associated with COVID-19 acute-care outbreaks in FH occurring between December 2020 and June 2021, when most of these infections were of the alpha and gamma lineages. All patients and HCWs with a positive COVID-19 test and epidemiologically linked to the outbreaks were included in the study. WGS results supported determination of epidemiological source for cases. The proportion of patient and HCW cases related to the outbreak was compared. All analyses were conducted using SAS version 4.3 software with the PROC GLM package. Results: Between December 2020 and June 2021, 49 acute-care COVID-19 outbreaks were declared. Point-prevalence testing of HCWs, in addition to routine patient PPT, was conducted in 28 outbreaks (57%), with 2,167 eligible HCWs (63%) tested. Testing identified 14 previously unknown HCW cases, representing 12.96% of all HCW cases epidemiologically linked to the outbreaks. None of these HCWs were determined to be the index case for their associated outbreak. There was no statistically significant difference between HCWs and patients regarding WGS failure rate, and all failed samples were removed from further analysis. Patients were 3.8 times as likely as HCWs to present as symptomatic when testing positive. HCWs were 2.2 times as likely as patients to have WGS results unrelated to the outbreak. Discussion: Although point-prevalence testing of HCW identified previously unknown cases, these cases were more likely than patients to be unrelated to the outbreak and therefore less useful in understanding the epidemiology of the outbreak. It is difficult to determine whether HCW PPT was effective at preventing transmission, especially with robust infection prevention measures already in place. Patients were more likely than HCWs to present as asymptomatic, however this may be due to the attribution of symptoms to other conditions. Conclusions: Point prevalence testing of HCWs during COVID-19 outbreaks may assist with preventing transmission but is less likely to contribute meaningful information to the investigation. Funding: None Disclosures: None

Background: Some hospitals continue to struggle with nosocomial transmission of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) despite years of infection control efforts. We investigated the relationship between unit infrastructural–organizational risk factors and nosocomial transmission of CDI and MRSA. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 100 eligible acute-care inpatient units from 12 hospitals in British Columbia, Canada, from April 1, 2020, to September 16, 2021. The outcome variables included whether a unit was on the CDI or MRSA vulnerable unit list (ie, defined as having ≥5 CDI cases or ≥6 MRSA cases being attributed to the unit in the last 6 fiscal periods), the average CDI/MRSA rate, as well as the average CDI/MRSA standardized infection ratio (SIR). Independent variables included, but were not limited to, infection control factors (eg hand hygiene rate), infrastructural factors (eg, unit age, total beds on unit), and organizational factors (eg, hallway bed utilization, nursing overtime). Multivariable regression was performed to identify statistically significant risk factors using SAS, R Studio, and Stata software. Results: For CDI, older units were associated with higher odds of being on the CDI vulnerable unit list (aOR, 1.086; 95% CI, 1.024–1.175), higher CDI rate (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 0.012; 95% CI, 0.004–0.020), and higher CDI SIR (aRR, 0.011; 95% CI, 0.003–0.020). Larger unit size was associated with higher odds of being on the CDI vulnerable unit list (aOR, 1.210; 95% CI, 1.095–1.400) and higher CDI SIR (aRR, 0.013; 95% CI, 0.001–0.026). For MRSA, an increase in hand hygiene rate was associated with lower odds of being on the MRSA vulnerable unit list (aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53–0.897), lower MRSA rate (aRR, −0.035; 95% CI, −0.063 to −0.008), and lower MRSA SIR (aRR, −0.039; 95% CI, −0.069 to −0.008). Higher MRSA bioburden was associated with higher odds of being on the MRSA vulnerable unit list (aOR, >999; 95% CI, >999 to >999), higher MRSA rate (aRR, 9.008; 95% CI, 5.586–12.429), and higher MRSA SIR (aRR, 4.964; 95% CI, 1.971–7.958). Additionally, higher MRSA rates were associated increased utilization of hallway beds (aRR, 0.680; 95% CI, 0.094–1.267), increased nursing overtime rate (aRR, 5.018; 95% CI, 1.210–8.826), and not having a clean supply room with the door consistently closed (aRR, −0.283; 95% CI, −0.536 to −0.03). Conclusions: Several infrastructural and organizational factors were associated with nosocomial transmissions of CDI and MRSA. Further research is needed to investigate the mechanisms by which these factors are associated. Disclosures: None

Background: Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in acute-care settings affects patients, healthcare workers, and the already-burdened healthcare system. An analysis of risk factors associated with outbreak severity was conducted to inform prevention strategies. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional analysis of COVID-19 outbreaks at Fraser Health (FH) acute-care sites between March 2020 and March 2021. Outbreak severity measures included COVID-19 attack rate, outbreak duration, and 30-day case mortality. Covariates at patient, outbreak, unit level, and facility level were included (Table 1). Generalized linear models with generalized estimation equations were used for all outcome measures, with outbreak duration and 30-day case mortality using multivariate negative binomial distributions, and attack rate using Gaussian distribution. A P value of .05 indicated statistical significance. Analyses were performed using SAS version 3.8 software, R version 4.1.0 software, and Stata version 16.0 software. Results: Between March 2020 and March 2021, 54 COVID-19 outbreaks were declared in FH acute-care sites involving 455 SARS-CoV-2–positive patients. The average outbreak duration was 23 days, the average attack rate was 28%, and the average 30-day all-cause mortality per outbreak was 2 deaths. The results of the full models are shown in Table 1. Discussion: We identified an inverse relationship between increased hand hygiene compliance during outbreaks and all 3 severity measures. Paradoxically, hand hygiene rates in the year prior to the pandemic were positively associated with duration and mortality. Increased unit age was also associated with increases in each of the severity measures. Comorbidity total factor was correlated with outbreak attack rate and duration, demonstrating the importance of individual patient characteristics in an outbreak. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the importance of hand hygiene practices during an outbreak. Additionally, it is important to understand the difficulties faced by older facilities, many of which face infrastructural challenges. This study reinforces the need to incorporate infection control standards into healthcare planning and construction. Funding: None Disclosures: None

Transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in acute-care settings affects patients, healthcare workers, and the healthcare system. We conducted an analysis of risk factors associated with outbreak severity to inform prevention strategies. This cross-sectional analysis of COVID-19 outbreaks was conducted at Fraser Health acute-care sites between March 2020 and March 2021. Outbreak severity measures included COVID-19 attack rate, outbreak duration, and 30-day case mortality. Generalized linear models with generalized estimating equations were used for all outcome measures. A P value of 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Analyses were performed using SAS version 3.8 software, R version 4.1.0 software, and Stata version 16.0 software. Between March 2020 and March 2021, 54 COVID-19 outbreaks were declared in Fraser Health acute-care sites. Overall, a 10% increase in the hand hygiene rate during the outbreak resulted in an 18% decrease in the attack rate (P < .01), 1 fewer death (P = .03), and shorter outbreaks (P < .01). A 10-year increase in unit age was associated with 2.2 additional days of outbreak (P < 0.01) and increases in the attack rate (P < .05) and the number of deaths (P < .01). We observed an inverse relationship between increased hand hygiene compliance during outbreaks and all 3 severity measures. Increased unit age was also associated with increases in each of the severity measures. This study highlights the importance of hand hygiene practices during an outbreak and the difficulties faced by older facilities, many of which have infrastructural challenges. The latter reinforces the need to incorporate infection control standards into healthcare planning and construction.

Background Early identification of patients colonized with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) facilitates the implementation of appropriate infection control measures and reduces nosocomial transmission. Sequential screening for CPE colonization of close contacts of known cases to confirm initial negative results is recommended. Fraser Health (FH) expanded sequential screening to patients with recent exposure to other risk factors following the identification of CPE in patients who initially screened negative. Methods FH screens patients for CPE who report healthcare outside of Canada or travel to endemic countries within the previous 12 months. Patients remain on contact precautions and are re-screened 7 and 21 days after the last known exposure date. We reviewed CPE cases with foreign healthcare or travel to endemic countries who screened negative on admission but subsequently screened positive within 30 days. Patients without confirmation of colonization through a rectal screen or possible exposure to a current nosocomial source were excluded. Whole-genome sequencing results were examined to confirm foreign healthcare or travel as the likely source of acquisition. Medical records were reviewed to obtain patient history and clinical details. Results Between November 2015 and January 2019, 21 patients had a positive CPE screen within 30 days of a negative screen, with no known CPE exposures during that time. The median time between the last date of known exposure and positive CPE screen was 20 days (range: 7–77 days). Twelve (57%) cases were hospitalized outside of Canada, 8 (38%) reported other foreign healthcare encounters, and 1 (5%) had no reported healthcare outside of Canada but had traveled to an endemic country. Sixteen (71%) cases received antibiotics prior to the positive CPE screen. Conclusion Patients with unrecognized CPE colonization are a source for nosocomial transmission. Patients screening negative for CPE with recent exposure to risk factors other than contact with a known case may screen positive at a later date. This may be due to higher colonization levels or antibiotic selection pressures. Consideration should be given to sequential CPE screening of high-risk patients based on the last day of exposure. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Looking at her perfect smoky eyes and subtly bronzed cheekbones, it's clear to see that Katy Short is a dab hand with the makeup brushes. The 30-year-old looks like she belongs in front of the camera, but spends her working life behind the scenes, enhancing the looks of models and celebrities, which have included singers Professor Green and Jessie J. I can't help but feel slightly selfconscious about my own hastily applied make-up as Katy guides me into her Market Harborough terrace.

Background: This study investigates factors associated with COVID-19 positivity among patients admitted to hospitals in British Columbia, Canada, and analyzes patient outcomes based on their screening question responses. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients admitted to 12 hospital emergency departments between November 1, 2020, and June 30, 2022. Patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 through PCR within 48 hours of admission were categorized as positive cases. Covariates included age, geographical region, and the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Among the 88,511 unique admissions, 8.6% (7,642) tested positive for COVID-19. Patients who met screening criteria were 4.7 times more likely to test positive. Patients in the later stages of the pandemic were less likely to be identified through screening questions. Patients who tested positive were 1.5 times more likely to die than those who tested negative, although patients who tested positive in later pandemic stages had lower overall mortality rates. Conclusion: While patients testing positive on admission were more likely to meet screening criteria and had a higher risk of mortality, the screening process missed half of all positive cases (3,907 patients). Implementing universal testing increased resource demands but identified the positive cases missed by screening alone, allowing for the implementation of precautionary measures to prevent potential transmission. Ultimately, the decision to implement universal testing should consider resource allocation, community prevalence, and patient demographics.

Homosexuality may not be for Mr. [Hal Adam] and [C. Barton], as it is not for us, but through Mr. Adam's pompous and pious attitude we know we are far more comfortable and confident with ourselves than he is. Matthew 7:1 \"Judge not, that ye be not judged.\" Who are we as a nation to decide who may marry whom? As human beings, the only time we have a right to judge one another is with crimes against humanity. Homosexuality is a sexual preference, and marriage should be a freedom of choice which we are all entitled to. Do Mr. Adam and C. Barton care that much what others do in their private lives? Children are the most accepting and loving people on Earth. And it is clearly stated in Matthew 18:3 \"And said, verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.\" Unfortunately, people like Mr. Adam and C. Barton are having a negative impact on the innocent minds of children.