Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
4
result(s) for
"Taillez, P"
Sort by:
Selection of Lactobacillus fermentum strains able to durably colonize the digestive tract of mice harbouring a complex human flora
by
Raibaud, P
,
Hautefort, I
,
Ducluzeau, R
in
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
,
bacteria
,
Biological and medical sciences
1999
Sixteen Lactobacillus fermentum strains were isolated from the fecal microflora of pigs. They were challenged in vivo, in gnotobiotic mice harboring a porcine flora devoid of lactobacilli. Some of the strains were able to colonize the digestive tract of the mice at high population levels, whilst other strains were eliminated. Chromosomal DNA restriction analysis performed on both colonizing (C-type) and non-colonizing (NC-type) strains were analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Strains LEMPL9 (C-type) and LEM 1.16A (NC-type) exhibited a high degree or homology. When challenged in mice harboring a simplified anaerobic flora, LEMPL9 was able to colonize the digestive tract of the animals whereas LEM1.16A was again eliminated. Mutagenesis performed on LEM1.16A allowed the isolation of a mutant able to colonize the gut of mice harboring the simplified anaerobic flora or a complex human flora, suggesting that genes involved in colonization process might have been affected to enhance the bacterium's colonization ability.
Journal Article
International Expert Consensus on Semantics of Multimodal Esophageal Cancer Treatment: Delphi Study
by
Yin-Kai Chao
,
Geert-Jan Creemers
,
Rutger Quispel
in
Cancer therapies
,
Chemoradiotherapy
,
Chemotherapy
2024
Background
Recent developments in esophageal cancer treatment, including studies exploring active surveillance following chemoradiotherapy, have led to a need for clear terminology and definitions regarding different multimodal treatment options.
Objective
The aim of this study was to reach worldwide consensus on the definitions and semantics of multimodal esophageal cancer treatment.
Methods
In total, 72 experts working in the field of multimodal esophageal cancer treatment were invited to participate in this Delphi study. The study comprised three Delphi surveys sent out by email and one online meeting. Input for the Delphi survey consisted of terminology obtained from a systematic literature search. Participants were asked to respond to open questions and to indicate whether they agreed or disagreed with different statements. Consensus was reached when there was ≥75% agreement among respondents.
Results
Forty-nine of 72 invited experts (68.1%) participated in the first online Delphi survey, 45 (62.5%) in the second survey, 21 (46.7%) of 45 in the online meeting, and 39 (86.7%) of 45 in the final survey. Consensus on neoadjuvant and definitive chemoradiotherapy with or without surgery was reached for 27 of 31 items (87%). No consensus was reached on follow-up after treatment with definitive chemoradiotherapy.
Conclusion(s)
Consensus was reached on most statements regarding terminology and definitions of multimodal esophageal cancer treatment. Implementing uniform criteria facilitates comparison of studies and promotes international research collaborations.
Journal Article