Explore the vast range of titles available.

Objective. To describe the components of the new Joint Commission International (JCI) accreditation program for hospitals, and compare this program with the four quality evaluation models described under the ExPeRT project (visitatie, ISO, EFQM, organizational accreditation). Results. All the models have in common with the JCI program the use of explicit criteria or standards, and the use of external reviewers. The JCI program is clearly an organizational accreditation approach with evaluation of all the «systems» of a health care organization. The JCI model evaluates the ability of an organization to assess and monitor its professional staff through internal mechanisms, in contrast with the external peer assessment used by the visitatie model. The JCI program provides a comprehensive framework for quality management in an organization, expanding the boundaries of the quality leadership and management found in the EFQM model, and beyond the quality control of the ISO model. The JCI organizational accreditation program was designed to permit international comparisons, difficult under the other models due to country specific variation. Conclusion. We believe that the organizational accreditation model, such as the international accreditation program, provides a framework for the convergence and integration of the strengths of all the models into a common health care quality evaluation model.

To provide hospital dental programs with useful information about the expansion of dental services and the identification of pertinent financial information, a production function and cost function analysis was performed. Results showed that hospital ownership (public or private) and size of the dental clinics were associated with the cost of providing dental services and the volume of services provided. Among 23 hospitals studied, private hospitals had a much lower cost per visit, had more paid attending dentist staff, paid their resident dentists less, and had significantly more billings paid by Medicaid and by patients than public hospitals. When stratified by ownership and size, these basic differences were accentuated for the small clinics. Except for primarily the Mediciaid and self-pay billings, the characteristics of large public and private hospital dental clinics were extremely similar. Multiple regression analysis found that a decrease in cost per visit was associated with more visits to dentists and more to hygienists. Production of dental services could be increased by increasing the number of attending dentists, hygienists, and residents. Preliminary econometric analysis reveals that the optimal mix of attending dentists to resident dentists should be approximately 1.8 full-time equivalent (FTE) resident for every 1 attending FTE dentist to produce the most dental services at the lowest cost.