Journal Article

Joint Commission International accreditation: relationship to four models of evaluation

VANOSTENBERG, PAUL, DONAHUE, K. TINA

2000

Overview

Objective. To describe the components of the new Joint Commission International (JCI) accreditation program for hospitals, and compare this program with the four quality evaluation models described under the ExPeRT project (visitatie, ISO, EFQM, organizational accreditation). Results. All the models have in common with the JCI program the use of explicit criteria or standards, and the use of external reviewers. The JCI program is clearly an organizational accreditation approach with evaluation of all the «systems» of a health care organization. The JCI model evaluates the ability of an organization to assess and monitor its professional staff through internal mechanisms, in contrast with the external peer assessment used by the visitatie model. The JCI program provides a comprehensive framework for quality management in an organization, expanding the boundaries of the quality leadership and management found in the EFQM model, and beyond the quality control of the ISO model. The JCI organizational accreditation program was designed to permit international comparisons, difficult under the other models due to country specific variation. Conclusion. We believe that the organizational accreditation model, such as the international accreditation program, provides a framework for the convergence and integration of the strengths of all the models into a common health care quality evaluation model.

• Publisher: Oxford University Press,OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS,Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
• Subject: European Union / Guidelines as Topic / Humans / International Cooperation / Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations - organization & administration / Leadership / Models, Organizational / Peer Review, Health Care / Program Development / Quality Control / Systems Analysis / Total Quality Management - organization & administration