Explore the vast range of titles available.

In patients with melanomas containing activating BRAF mutations, the combination of a BRAF inhibitor and a MEK inhibitor improved overall survival, as compared with a BRAF inhibitor alone, and was associated with many fewer second skin tumors. The treatment of metastatic melanoma is rapidly evolving. The potent and specific BRAF inhibitors vemurafenib and dabrafenib, as compared with chemotherapy, have significantly improved response rates, along with progression-free and overall survival, in patients with metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations. 1 , 2 However, acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitors frequently develops through reactivation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, resulting in a median progression-free survival of 6 to 8 months. 2 – 5 In addition, the use of BRAF inhibitors may result in the development of secondary skin tumors, originating from a paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway in cells . . .

Fatigue is a common and distressing symptom in cancer patients, especially in lymphoma patients. One hypothesized mechanism in the etiology of fatigue is a vicious circle between fatigue, physical inactivity, and deconditioning. However, the natural evolution of physical activity and physical fitness over the course of treatment is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this longitudinal study was to assess fatigue, physical activity, and physical fitness in lymphoma patients before, during, and after treatment. Fatigue was measured with the EORTC-QLQ-C30, physical activity with an accelerometer, and physical fitness with a maximal incremental cycle ergometer test, 6-min walking distance test, and muscle strength measurements. Differences between the three measurement moments and baseline differences between Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, early and advanced disease, were analyzed. Twenty-nine patients were included. Functional exercise capacity and quadriceps force were impaired before the start of treatment (86 ± 15 and 82 ± 16 % of predicted value, respectively). Over the course of treatment, significant declines were found in hemoglobin, quadriceps force, handgrip force, and maximal oxygen uptake, while patients reported more fatigue ( p values < 0.016). Fatigue was significantly correlated with hemoglobin ( r  = −0.49), physical activity ( r  = 0.81), and physical functioning ( r  = −0.44). Large interindividual variations were found. The present study partially confirmed the hypothesized vicious circle between fatigue, physical inactivity, and deconditioning. Further research with larger samples and longer follow-up is needed to identify factors associated with individual variation in the evolution of fatigue, physical activity, and physical fitness.

Fatigue is one of the most common and most distressing problems in lymphoma patients. A vicious circle is presumed between fatigue, physical activity and physical fitness. It is plausible that an exercise training program would be effective in reducing fatigue, by breaking this vicious circle. The purposes of this review are to provide an overview of the literature on physical activity and physical fitness in lymphoma patients before, during and after anticancer treatment, and to summarise the literature on exercise training interventions in lymphoma patients. We conducted a search for studies reporting on physical activity, physical fitness or the effect of exercise training in lymphoma patients. A total of 13 articles were selected. Due to a small number of articles and methodological issues, it was not possible to make final conclusions. The results indicated that 21 % to 29 % of lymphoma survivors meet the American College of Sports Medicine public health guidelines for physical activity. Maximal exercise capacity was decreased before treatment, especially in patients with advanced disease, and was close to normal during and/or after treatment. Lower levels of physical activity as well as lower physical fitness seemed to be associated with more symptoms of fatigue. Aerobic exercise training interventions seemed to be feasible and safe and had positive effects on cardiorespiratory fitness, fatigue and self-reported physical functioning. Further research is needed to examine physical activity and physical fitness in a longitudinal, objective way in large samples and to examine the effect of exercise training in lymphoma patients.

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab is approved as first-line regimen for intermediate-risk or poor-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and nivolumab monotherapy as second-line therapy for all risk groups. We aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of nivolumab monotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination as an immunotherapeutic boost after no response to nivolumab monotherapy in patients with intermediate-risk and poor-risk clear-cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma. TITAN-RCC is a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial, done at 28 hospitals and cancer centres across Europe (Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK). Adults (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed intermediate-risk or poor-risk clear-cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma who were formerly untreated (first-line population) or pretreated with one previous systemic therapy (anti-angiogenic or temsirolimus; second-line population) were eligible. Patients had to have a Karnofsky Performance Status score of at least 70 and measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (version 1.1). Patients started with intravenous nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks. On early progressive disease (week 8) or non-response at week 16, patients received two or four doses of intravenous nivolumab (3 mg/kg) and ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) boosts (once every 3 weeks), whereas responders continued with intravenous nivolumab (240 mg, once every 2 weeks), but could receive two to four boost doses of nivolumab plus ipilimumab for subsequent progressive disease. The primary endpoint was confirmed investigator-assessed objective response rate in the full analysis set, which included all patients who received at least one dose of study medication; safety was also assessed in this population. An objective response rate of more than 25% was required to reject the null hypothesis and show improvement, on the basis of results from the pivotal phase 3 CheckMate-025 trial. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02917772, and is complete. Between Oct 28, 2016, and Nov 30, 2018, 207 patients were enrolled and all received nivolumab induction (109 patients in the first-line group; 98 patients in the second-line group). 60 (29%) of 207 patients were female and 147 (71%) were male. 147 (71%) of 207 patients had intermediate-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma and 51 (25%) had poor-risk disease. After median follow-up of 27·6 months (IQR 10·5–34·8), 39 (36%, 90% CI 28–44; p=0·0080) of 109 patients in the first-line group and 31 (32%, 24–40; p=0·083) of 98 patients in the second-line group had a confirmed objective response for nivolumab with and without nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Confirmed response to nivolumab at week 8 or 16 was observed in 31 (28%) of 109 patients in the first-line group and 18 (18%) of 98 patients in the second-line group. The most frequent grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (reported in ≥5% of patients) were increased lipase (15 [7%] of 207 patients), colitis (13 [6%]), and diarrhoea (13 [6%]). Three deaths were reported that were deemed to be treatment-related: one due to possible ischaemic stroke, one due to respiratory failure, and one due to pneumonia. In treatment-naive patients, nivolumab induction with or without nivolumab plus ipilimumab boosts significantly improved the objective response rate compared with that reported for nivolumab monotherapy in the CheckMate-025 trial. However, overall efficacy seemed inferior when compared with approved upfront nivolumab plus ipilimumab. For second-line treatment, nivolumab plus ipilimumab could be a rescue strategy on progression with approved nivolumab monotherapy. Bristol Myers Squibb.

Background Previous studies have investigated the protective effect of vitamin D serum levels, at diagnosis and during the follow-up period after treatment, on melanoma outcome. In the present study we assess whether vitamin D supplementation, in the follow-up period after diagnosis and surgical resection of the primary tumor, has a protective effect on relapse of cutaneous malignant melanoma and whether this protective effect correlates with vitamin D levels in serum and Vitamin D Receptor immunoreactivity in the primary tumor. Methods/design This study is a multicenter randomized double blind placebo- controlled phase III trial. Patients between the age of 18 and 80 years diagnosed and treated surgically for a melanoma stage IB-III are eligible for randomization in a 1:1 ratio to active treatment or placebo. The study drug is taken each month and consists of either 100,000 International Unit cholecalciferol or arachidis oleum raffinatum used as a placebo. The primary endpoint is relapse free survival. The secondary endpoints are 25 hydroxyvitamin D3 serum levels at diagnosis and at 6 month intervals, melanoma subtype, melanoma site and stage of melanoma at diagnosis according to the 2009 American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging and classification. At randomization a bloodsample is taken for DNA analysis. The study is approved by the local Ethics Committees. Discussion If we can confirm our hypothesis that vitamin D supplementation after removal of the tumor has a protective effect on relapse of cutaneous malignant melanoma we may reduce the burden of CMM at several levels. Patients, diagnosed with melanoma may have a better clinical outcome and improved quality of life. There will be a decrease in health care costs related to treatment of metastatic disease and there will be a decrease in loss of professional years, which will markedly reduce the economic burden of the disease. Trial registration Clinical Trial.gov, NCT01748448 , 05/12/2012

Objectives The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the incidence of bowel wall oedema on computed tomography (CT) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with sunitinib, and to investigate its association with diarrhoea. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of all RCC patients treated with sunitinib at our hospital between December 2005 and December 2011. The presence or absence of bowel wall oedema on these CT examinations was scored. The presence of diarrhoea preceding, during, or after sunitinib treatment was identified from the patient files and retrospectively graded. Results For 54 of 87 patients, bowel wall oedema was present on at least one CT examination. Of these 54 patients, the right-sided colonic segment was affected in 87 %. Diarrhoea was the most common reported adverse event during treatment, with 58 patients (67 %) having grade 1/2 diarrhoea and 9 patients (10 %) having grade 3. There was a statistically significant correlation between the incidence of CT-scored bowel oedema and diarrhoea during sunitinib treatment ( P  = 0.004). Conclusions This study shows a very high incidence of bowel wall oedema and a strong correlation between the incidence of bowel wall oedema and diarrhoea in patients treated with sunitinib. Key Points • Sunitinib is routinely used in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma . • Diarrhoea is the most common reported adverse event during sunitinib treatment . • Incidence of bowel oedema and diarrhoea during sunitinib treatment is correlated . • Radiologists should avoid misinterpretation of bowel oedema as infectious colitis .

Background/Objectives: BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, and CHEK2 are known cancer predisposition genes (CPGs), but tumor risk in patients with simultaneous pathogenic variants (PVs) in CPGs remains largely unknown. In this study, we describe six patients from five families with multiple cancers who coinherited a combination of PVs in these genes. Methods: PVs were identified using NGS DNA sequencing and were confirmed by Sanger. Results: Families 1, 2, and 3 presented PVs in BRCA2 and ATM, family 4 in BRCA2 and BRCA1, and family 5 in BRCA2 and CHEK2. PVs were identified using NGS DNA sequencing and were confirmed by Sanger. The first family included patients with kidney, prostate, and breast cancer, in addition to pancreatic adenocarcinomas. In the second family, a female had breast cancer, while a male from the third family had prostate, gastric, and pancreatic cancer. The fourth family included a male with pancreatic cancer, and the fifth family a female with breast cancer. Conclusions: The early age of diagnosis and the development of multiple cancers in the reported patients indicate a very high risk of cancer in double-heterozygous patients associated with PVs in HR-related CPGs. Therefore, in families with patients who differ from other family members in terms of phenotype, age of diagnosis, or type of cancer, the cascade testing needs to include the study of other CPGs.

Cutaneous melanoma is the most aggressive form of skin cancer. With age as a risk factor, melanoma is projected to become a substantial healthcare burden. The clinical course of melanoma in older patients is different from that in middle-aged and younger patients: melanomas are thicker, have higher mitotic rates and are more likely to be ulcerated. Older patients also have a higher mortality rate, yet, paradoxically, have a lower rate of lymph node metastases. After decades of no significant progress in the treatment of this devastating disease, novel insights into the mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of metastatic melanoma have led to new and remarkably efficient therapeutic opportunities. The discovery that about half of all melanomas carry BRAF mutations led to the introduction of targeted therapy with significant improvements in clinical outcomes. Although these drugs appear to be equally effective in older patients, specific considerations regarding adverse events are required. Besides targeted therapy, immunotherapy has emerged as an alternative therapeutic option. Antibodies that block cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) can induce responses with high durability. Despite an aging immune system, older patients seem to benefit to the same degree from these treatments, apparently without increased toxicity. In this review, we focus on the epidemiology, clinicopathological features, and recent developments of systemic treatment in cutaneous melanoma with regard to older patients.

To the Editor: In their study of sunitinib versus interferon alfa in the treatment of metastatic renal-cell carcinoma, Motzer et al. (Jan. 11 issue) 1 report that a high proportion of patients in both study groups had grade 3 or 4 fatigue. We wonder whether hypothyroidism could be a possible explanation and whether thyroid function was evaluated. Interferon can cause thyroid dysfunction, 2 and there is growing evidence that sunitinib also causes abnormalities in thyroid function. 3 – 5 In our group of 65 patients who were treated with sunitinib for renal-cell carcinoma or gastrointestinal stromal tumors, the incidence of laboratory evidence of thyroid . . .